In comparison with naturally stratified deposits, anthropogenic strata often have large variability in physical and chemical characteristics, which can be determined only through field surveys and laboratory tests. The estimation of their spatial distribution, based on the modelling of their basal surface, may output imprecise results, since the interpolation process is often affected by insufficient input data, which are provided by available borehole-log data. This paper reports the results of a multitemporal-analysis methodology, which is supported by historical maps that are generally available for urban centres. The methodology allows the spatial characterization of major portions of anthropogenic deposits, which were mainly produced after the Industrial Revolution, worldwide. The first tests seemed to be satisfactory, although the selected area, which has been greatly urbanized since the end of the 19th century, is part of a city in which humans have made important modifications since ancient times.
BardPYRiepl-ThomasJ (2000) Wave propagation in complex geological structures and their effects on strong ground motion. In: KouselEMonolisG (eds) Wave Motion in Earthquake Engineering. Boston, MA: WIT press, pp. 37–95.
2.
BrownAGToothSBullardJEet al. (2017) The geomorphology of the Anthropocene: Emergence, status and implications. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms42(1): 71–90.
3.
ChesnutWS (1980) Environmental geology. In: HerbertC (ed.) Geology of the Sydney 1:100,000 Sheet 9130. Geological Survey of New South Wales, Department of Mineral Resources, pp. 173–182.
4.
ChildsC (2004) Interpolating surfaces in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst. ArcUserJuly–September: 32–35.
5.
CiotoliGStiglianoFManciniMet al. (2015) Geostatistical interpolators for the estimation of the geometry of anthropogenic deposits in Rome (Italy) and related physical–mechanical characterization with implications on geohazard assessment. Environmental Earth Sciences74(3): 2635–2658.
6.
CorazzaAMarraF (1995) Carta dello spessore dei terreni di riporto. Tav. 13-Cap. 1. In: FunicielloR (ed.) La geologia di Roma: Il centro storico. Memorie Descrittive Carta Geologica d’Italia 50, Roma.
7.
DavisBM (1987) Uses and abuses of cross-validation in geostatistics. Mathematical Geology19(3): 241–248.
8.
de BeerJPriceSJFordJR (2012) 3D modelling of geological and anthropogenic deposits at the World Heritage Site of Bryggen in Bergen, Norway. Quaternary International251: 107–116.
9.
Del MonteMD’OreficeMLubertiGMet al. (2016) Geomorphological classification of urban landscapes: The case study of Rome (Italy). Journal of Maps12(Iss Supl.): 178–189.
10.
EdgeworthMdeB RichterDWatersCet al. (2015) Diachronous beginnings of the Anthropocene: The lower bounding surface of anthropogenic deposits. The Anthropocene Review2(1): 1–26.
11.
EllisonRAMcMillanAALottGK (2002) Ground Characterization of the Urban Environment: A Guide to Best Practice. Urban Geoscience and Geological Hazards Programme, British Geological Survey Research Report, Keyworth, Nottingham RR/02/05, 37 pp.
12.
FordJRKesslerHCooperAHet al. (2010) An Enhanced Classification of Artificial Ground. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham Open Report, OR/10/036, 32 pp.
13.
FordJRPriceSJCooperAHet al. (2014) An assessment of lithostratigraphy for anthropogenic deposits. In: WatersCNZalasiewiczJAWilliamsMet al. (eds) A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, pp. 395: 55–89.
14.
FriendlyMDenisDJ (2001) Milestones in the history of thematic cartography, statistical graphics, and data visualization. Web document, updated 5July2006. Available at: http://www.datavis.ca/milestones/ (accessed 18 November 2016).
15.
GreichgauerTGoedeckeGZimmererK (2000) Explosive ordnance and recycling of derelict land – Only a problem of communication? In: Contaminated Soil 2000. Proceedings of the 7th International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Soil, 18–22 September 2000, Leipzig. London: Thomas Telford, pp. 882–883.
16.
HenglT (2006) Finding the right pixel size. Computers & Geosciences32(9): 1283–1298.
17.
HookeRL (1994) On the efficacy of humans as geomorphic agents. GSA Today4(9): 217–225.
18.
HookeRL (1999) Spatial distribution of human geomorphic activity in the United States: Comparison with rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms24(8): 687–692.
19.
HookeRL (2000) On the history of humans as geomorphic agents. Geology28(9): 843–846.
20.
HookeRLMartín-DuqueJFPedrazaJ (2012) Land transformation by humans: A review. GSA Today22(12): 4–10.
21.
HowardJL (2014) Proposal to add anthrostratigraphic and technostratigraphic units to the stratigraphic code for classification of anthropogenic Holocene deposits. The Holocene24(12): 1856–1861.
Istituto Geografico Militare (IGM) (1873) Tavoletta 150 IV NO ‘Castel Giubileo’; Tavoletta 150 IV SO ‘Roma’. Firenze: Istituto Geografico Militare.
24.
Istituto Geografico Militare (IGM) (1924) Piano Topografico di Roma e suburbio. Comune di Roma: Istituto Geografico Militare.
25.
JacksonMMarraF (2006) Roman stone masonry: Volcanic foundations of the ancient city. American Journal of Archaeology110(3): 403–436.
26.
JamesLAHodgsonMEGhoshalSet al. (2012) Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis. Geomorphology137(1): 181–198.
27.
JordanHHamiltonKLawleyRet al. (2016) Anthropogenic contribution to the geological and geomorphological record: A case study from Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK. Geomorphology253: 534–546.
28.
Klein GoldewijkKBeusenAJanssenP (2010) Long term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way, HYDE 3.1. The Holocene20(4): 565–573.
29.
KubikKBotmanAG (1976) Interpolation accuracy for topographic and geological surfaces. ITC Journal2: 236–274.
30.
LancianiR (1893–1901) Forma Urbis Romae – Consilio et auctoritate Regiae Academiae Lyncaeorum formam dimensus est et ad modulum 1:1000 delineavit Rodolphus Lanciani Romanus. Milano: Ulrico HOEPLI.
31.
LernerDN (2002) Identifying and quantifying urban recharge: A review. Hydrogeology Journal10(1): 143–152.
32.
LubertiGMMarraFFlorindoF (2017) A review of the stratigraphy of Rome (Italy) according to geochronologically and paleomagnetically constrained aggradational successions, glacio-eustatic forcing and volcano-tectonic processes. Quaternary International438(B): 40–67.
33.
LubertiGMPrestininziAEspositoC (2015) Development of a geological model useful for the study of the natural hazards in urban environments: An example from the eastern sector of Rome (Italy). Italian Journal of Engineering Geology and Environment2: 41–62.
34.
McMillanAAPowellJH (1993) BGS Rock Classification Scheme: The Classification of Artificial (Man-Made Ground) and Natural Superficial Deposits. Version 2. British Geological Survey, Technical Report, Keyworth, Nottingham, WG/93/46/R, 46 pp.
35.
McMillanAAPowellJH (1999) BGS Rock Classification Scheme. Volume 4, Classification of Artificial (Man-Made) Ground and Natural Superficial Deposits: Applications to Geological Maps and Datasets in the UK. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, Research Report, RR/99/004, 65 pp.
36.
MakedonTChatzigogosNPSpandosS (2009) Engineering geological parameters affecting the response of Τhessaloniki’s urban fill to a major seismic event. Engineering Geology104(3): 167–180.
37.
MarchantAPBanksVJRoyseKet al. (2011) An initial screening tool for water resource contamination due to development in the Olympic Park 2012 site, London. Environmental Earth Sciences64(2): 483–495.
38.
MarraFD’AmbrosioEGaetaMet al. (2016) Petrochemical identification and insights on chronological employment of the volcanic aggregates used in ancient Roman mortars. Archaeometry58(2): 177–200.
39.
MatherJDSpenceIMLawrenceARet al. (1996) Manmade hazards. In: McCallEJHde MulderEFJMarkerBR (eds) Urban Geoscience. AGID Special Publication Series 20. Rotterdam: Balkema, pp. 127–161.
40.
MejuMA (2000) Geoelectrical investigation of old/abandoned, covered landfill sites in urban areas: Model development with a genetic diagnosis approach. Journal of Applied Geophysics44(2): 115–150.
41.
MitamuraMFujiwaraMHiraiM et alet al. (2011) Distribution of valley fill in the Quaternary hilly area, Osaka, Japan. Journal of Geosciences, Osaka City University54(2): 17–29. Available at: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110008721429/.
42.
MoltkeHKB (1852) Carta Topografica di Roma e dei suoi contorni fino alla distanza di 10 miglia fuori le mura. Scala 1:25000. Berlino: Simone Schropp e Co.
43.
NireiHFurunoKKazaokaOet al. (2012) Classification of man-made strata for assessment of geopollution. Episodes35(2): 333–336.
44.
NireiHMezzanoASatkūnasJet al. (2014) Environmental problems associated with man-made strata and their potential management. Episodes37(1): 33–40.
45.
NolliG (1748) Nuova pianta di Roma data in luce da Giambattista Nolli l’anno MDCCXLVIII. Roma
46.
O’GormanEBeattieJHenryM (2016) Histories of climate, science, and colonization in Australia and New Zealand, 1800–1945. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change7(6): 893–909.
47.
PapadopoulosNSarrisAYiMJet al. (2009) Urban archaeological investigations using surface 3D ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography methods. Exploration Geophysics40(1): 56–68.
48.
PariseM (2012) A present risk from past activities: sinkhole occurrence above underground quarries. Carbonates and Evaporites27(2): 109–118.
49.
PetermansTDelveeschouwerXPourielFet al et al. (2006) Mapping the local seismic hazard in the urban area of Brussels, Belgium. In: Proceedings of the 10th IAEG 2006 Congress, Nottingham, 6–10 September 2006. Paper number 424, pp. 1–11. London: The Geological Society.
50.
PotereDSchneiderA (2007) A critical look at representations of urban areas in global maps. GeoJournal69(1–2): 55–80.
51.
Presidenza Del Censo (1839) Carta topografica del suburbano di Roma, desunta dalle mappe del nuovo censimento e trigonometricamente delineata nella proporzione di 1.15000 per ordine dell’E.mo e R.mo Principe Sig. Cardinale Gio. Francesco Falzacappa. Filippo Trojani inc. Roma: Stato Pontificio.
52.
PriceSJBurkeHFTerringtonRLet al. (2010) The 3D characterisation of the zone of human interaction and the sustainable use of underground space in urban and peri-urban environments: Case studies from the UK. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften161(2): 219–235.
53.
PriceSJFordJRCooperAHet al. (2011) Humans as major geological and geomorphological agents in the Anthropocene: the significance of artificial ground in Great Britain. In: ZalasiewiczJAWilliamsMHaywoodAet al. (eds) The Anthropocene: A new epoch of geological time? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (Series A)369(1938): 1056–1084.
54.
Regione Lazio (2005) 374062 Villa Borghese; 374073 Roma Nomentano; 374074 Monte Sacro; 374114 Roma Appio. Carta Tecnica Regionale. Scala 1:5000. Latina: LAMCO s.r.l.
Sanjust di TeuladaE (1908) Piano Regolatore di Roma 1908. Roma: Comune di Roma.
57.
SchuldenreinJAiuvalasitM (2011) Urban geoarchaeology and sustainability: A case study from Manhattan Island, New York City, USA. In: BrownAGBasellLSButzerKW (eds) Geoarchaeology, climate change, and sustainability. Geological Society of America Special Paper476: 153–172.
58.
SteffenWCrutzenPJMcNeillJR (2007) The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?Ambio36(8): 614–621.
59.
SzabóJ (2010) Anthropogenic geomorphology: Subject and system. In: SzabóJDávidLLóczyD (eds) Anthropogenic Geomorphology. Debrecen, Hungary: Springer, pp. 3–10.
60.
TameCCundyABRoyseKRet al. (2013) Three-dimensional geological modelling of anthropogenic deposits at small urban sites: A case study from Sheepcote Valley, Brighton, UK. Journal of Environmental Management129: 628–634.
61.
TeichMPorterR (1996) The Industrial Revolution in National Context: Europe and the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 440 pp.
62.
TestaOCampolunghiMPFunicielloRet al. (2008) Il problema dei riporti e le modificazioni della forma originaria. In: FunicielloRPraturlonAGiordanoG (eds) La geologia di Roma dal centro storico alla periferia. Memorie Descrittive Carta Geologica d’Italia80(1): 145–168.
63.
Van Den EeckhautMPoesenJDusarMet al. (2007) Sinkhole formation above underground limestone quarries: A case study in South Limburg (Belgium). Geomorphology91(1): 19–37.
64.
VentrigliaU (1971) Geologia della città di Roma. Roma: Amministrazione Provinciale di Roma, 417 pp.
65.
VentrigliaU (2002) Geologia del territorio del comune di Roma. Roma: Amministrazione Provinciale di Roma, 810 pp.
66.
VillainLSundströmNPerttuNet al. (2015) Evaluation of the effectiveness of backfilling and sealing at an open-pit mine using ground penetrating radar and geoelectrical surveys, Kimheden, northern Sweden. Environmental Earth Sciences73(8): 4495–4509.
67.
WatersCNZalasiewiczJAWilliamsMet al. (2014) A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene? In: WatersCNZalasiewiczJAWilliamsMet al. (eds) A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene. Geological Society, London, Special Publications395: 1–21.
68.
WilkinsonBHMcElroyBJ (2007) The impact of humans on continental erosion and sedimentation. Geological Society of America Bulletin119(1–2): 140–156.
69.
WilsonGMcDonaldIDRoyPSet al. (1983) ‘Sydney’ Geological Series Sheet 9130 (Edition 1). 1:100,000 Geological Map. Geological Survey of New South Wales, Department of Mineral Resources, Sydney.
70.
WitcherR (2005) The extended metropolis: Urbs, suburbium and population. Journal of Roman Archaeology18: 120–138.
71.
WronnaMBaptistaMAGötzJ (2017) On the construction and use of a Paleo-DEM to reproduce tsunami inundation in a historical urban environment – The case of the 1755 Lisbon tsunami in Cascais. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk8(2): 841–862.
72.
YangYLernerDNBarrettMHet al. (1999) Quantification of groundwater recharge in the city of Nottingham, UK. Environmental Geology38(3): 183–198.
73.
ZalasiewiczJWatersCNIvardoSulJAet al. (2016) The geological cycle of plastics and their use as a stratigraphic indicator of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene13: 4–17.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
