This article argues against a proposal by Theophile J. Meek that the futurum instans (the imminent future, “about to”) represents the correct verbal aspect for כמשיב in Gen 38.29 and כפרחת in Gen 40.10. The reasons for rejecting the futurum instans in these constructions include Meek’s rigid view of aspect as it applies to the participle and the existence of less ambiguous constructions to communicate the imminent future. This article concludes by recommending that כמשיב ידו be translated as “as soon as he drew back his hand” and כפרחת as “as soon as it put forth its leaves.”
BennettW. H.1904. Genesis. The New-Century Bible. New York: H. Frowde.
2.
GuttmacherAlan F.1962. “Compound and Complex Presentations Associated with Plural Births: Etiology, Incidence and Prognosis.” Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology5:1000–1008.
3.
HamiltonVictor P.1995. The Book of Genesis: Chapters 18–50. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
4.
JacobB.1934. Das erste Buch der Tora: Genesis. Berlin: Schocken.
5.
JoüonPaulMuraokaT.1996. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew, Part Three: Syntax. Subsidia Biblica 14/2. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute.
6.
KautzschE., ed. 1910. Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar. Translated by CowleyA.2nd English ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
MeekTheophile J.1959. “I Kings 20:1-10.” Journal of Biblical Literature78:73–75.
8.
MeekTheophile J.1960. “Translating the Hebrew Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature79:328–35.
9.
NissenEdward D.1958. “Twins: Collision, Impaction, Compaction, and Interlocking.” Obstetrics and Gynecology11: 514–26.
10.
PhilipTarja S.2006. Menstruation and Childbirth in the Bible: Fertility and Impurity. Studies in Biblical Literature 88. New York: Peter Lang.
11.
PreussJulius. 1923. Biblisch-talmudische Medizin: Beiträge zur Geschichte der Heilkunde und der Kultur überhaupt. 3rd ed.Berlin: S. Karger.
12.
ReyburnWilliam D.FryEuan McG.1997. A Handbook on Genesis. UBS Handbook Series. New York: United Bible Societies.
13.
RobinsonJancis, ed. 2006. The Oxford Companion to Wine. 3rd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
RydhströmHåkanCullbergGöran. 1990. “Pregnancies with Growth-Retarded Twins in Breech-Vertex Presentation at Increased Risk for Entanglement during Delivery.” Journal of Perinatal Medicine18: 45–50.
15.
SalmEva. 1996. Juda und Tamar: Eine exegetische Studie zu Gen 38. Forschung zur Bibel 76. Würzburg: Echter.
16.
SarnaNahum M.1989. Genesis: The Traditional Hebrew Text with the New JPS Translation Commentary. The JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society.
17.
VermeulenKarolien. 2012. “Two of a Kind: Twin Language in the Hebrew Bible.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament37: 135–50.
18.
ViezelEran. 2011. “The Influence of Realia on Biblical Depictions of Childbirth.” Vetus Testamentum61: 685–89.
19.
WaltkeBruce K.O’ConnorM.1990. An Introduction to Hebrew Syntax. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
20.
WenhamGordon J.1994. Genesis 16–50. Word Biblical Commentary 2. Dallas: Word Books.
21.
Wernberg-MøllerP.1959. “Observations on the Hebrew Participle.” Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft71: 54–67.
22.
WestermannClaus. 1986. Genesis 37–50: A Commentary. Translated by ScullionJohn J.Minneapolis: Augsburg.
23.
WilliamsRonald J.1976. Hebrew Syntax: An Outline. 2nd ed.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
