This research examines the impact of a local origin label on perceptions and purchase intent regarding food products. It also reveals the psychological mechanism specific to local origin to explain these effects. Two experiments, conducted on a total of 632 consumers, show that cheese (Study 1) and apples (Study 2) are perceived as healthier, better tasting, and more respectful of the environment and the work of farmers when they are presented as local foods (as opposed to national or from another “region”). Purchase intention is also higher when products are labeled as locally sourced. Study 2 shows that these effects can be explained by construal level theory. Local produce is perceived as spatially and psychologically closer by the consumer, who can thus picture more specifically how it was grown and prepared, and this in turn positively influences perceptions and purchase intent. These effects are measured on products that are not typical of the territory. They persist regardless of the degree of local identity of the person evaluating the product.
AurierPFortF (2005) Effets de la région d’origine du produit de la marque et de leurs congruences sur l’évaluation des consommateurs: application aux produits agroalimentaires. Recherche et Applications en Marketing20(4): 29–52.
2.
BarryC (2012) Un producteur sur cinq vend en circuits courts. Agreste Primeur276.
3.
BergkvistLRossiterJ (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research44(2): 175–184.
4.
BougheraraDGrolleauGMzoughiN (2009) Buy local, pollute less: What drives households to join a community supported farm?Ecological Economics68(5): 1488–1495.
5.
BrileyDAWyerJS (2002) The effect of group membership salience on the avoidance of negative outcomes: Implications for social and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research29(3): 400–415.
6.
BrownGRaymondC (2007) The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography27: 89–111.
7.
CarterSESannaLJ (2008) It’s not just what you say but when you say it: Self-presentation and temporal construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44(5): 1339–1345.
8.
ChambersSLobbAButlerL. (2007) Local national and imported foods: A qualitative study. Appetite49(1): 208–213.
9.
ChandonPWansinkB (2007) Is obesity caused by calorie underestimation? A psychophysical model of meal size estimation. Journal of Marketing Research44(1): 84–99.
10.
Charton-VachetFLombartC (2015) New conceptual and operational approach to the link between individual and region: Regional belonging. Recherche et Applications en Marketing30(1): 52–80.
11.
DesrochersPShimizuH (2012) The locavore’s dilemna. In praise of the 10,000-mile diet. New York: Public Affairs.
12.
DharRKimEY (2007) Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology17(2): 96–100.
13.
Ethicity (2013) Les Français et la consommation responsable: la prise de conscience. Report. Paris: Greenflex-Ethicity.
Fernández-FerrínPBande-VilelaB (2013) Regional ethnocentrism: Antecedents consequences and mode-rating effects. Food Quality and Preference30: 299–308.
16.
ForehandMRDeshpandéRReedAII (2002) Identity salience and the influence of differential activation of the social self-schema on advertising response. Journal of Applied Psychology87(6): 1086–1099.
17.
FujitaKHendersonMDEngJ. (2006) Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science17(4): 278–282.
18.
GallenC (2005) Le rôle des représentations mentales dans le processus de choix, une approche pluridisciplinaire appliquée au cas des produits alimentaires. Recherche et Applications en Marketing20(3): 59–77.
19.
General Commission for Sustainable Development (2013) Consommer local: les avantages ne sont pas toujours ceux que l’on croit. Report from the French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development no.158, March. Available at: http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/LPS158.pdf (accessed 23 November 2015).
20.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
21.
HendersonMDFujitaKTropeY. (2006) Transcending the “Here”: The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology91(5): 845–856.
22.
KozupJCCreyerEHBurtonS (2003) Making healthful food choices: The influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers’ evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. Journal of Marketing67(2): 19–34.
23.
LibermanNSagristanoMDTropeY (2002) The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology38(6): 523–534.
24.
LibermanNTropeYWakslakC (2007a) Construal Level Theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology17(2): 113–117.
25.
LibermanNTropeYMcCreaSM. (2007b) The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology43(1): 143–149.
26.
LuomalaHT (2007) Exploring the role of food origin as a source of meanings for consumers and as a determinant of consumers’ actual food choices. Journal of Business Research60(2): 122–129.
27.
MaheswaranD (1994) Country of origin as a stereotype: Effects of consumer expertise and attribute strength on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research21(2): 354–365.
28.
MaréchalMSpanuA (2010) Les circuits courts favorisent-ils l’adoption de pratiques agricoles plus respectueuses de l’environnement?Courrier de l’environnement de l’INRA59: 33–45.
29.
MerleAPiotrowskiM (2012) Consommer des produits alimentaires locaux: comment et pourquoi?Décisions Marketing67: 37–48.
30.
MundlerPRumpusL (2012) La route des paniers: réflexions sur l’efficacité énergétique d’une forme de distribution alimentaire en circuits courts. Cahiers de géographie du Québec56(157): 225–241.
31.
Natural Marketing Institute (2010) LOHAS Consumer Trends DatabaseTM (LCTD). USA. Available at: www.nmisolutions.com
32.
OakesME (2006) Filling yet fattening: Stereotypical beliefs about the weight gain potential and satiation of foods. Appetite46(2): 224–233.
33.
OppenheimerDMMeyvisbTDavidenkoN (2009) Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisfying to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45: 867–872.
34.
ParigiJ (2013) Leclerc vise 300 millions d’euros de chiffres d’affaires avec les produits locaux. LSA, 25April, 2271.
35.
PetersonRAJolibertAP (1995) A meta-analysis of country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies26(4): 883–900.
36.
PoulainJP (2002) Sociologies de l’alimentation. Paris: PUF.
37.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers36(4): 717–731.
38.
ReedAIIForehandMRPuntoniS. (2012) Identity-based consumer behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing29(4): 310–321.
39.
RoininenKArvolaALähteenmäkiL (2006) Exploring consumers’ perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: Laddering and word association. Food Quality and Preference17(1–2): 20–30.
40.
RothMSRomeoJB (1992) Matching product category and country image perceptions: A framework. Journal of International Business Studies23: 477–497.
41.
SchlichEBieglerIHardertB. (2006) La consommation d’énergie finale de différents produits alimentaires: un essai de comparaison. Courrier de l’Environnement de l’INRA53: 111–120.
42.
SchneiderMFrancisC (2005) Marketing locally produced foods: Consumer and farmer opinions in Washington County Nebraska. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems20(4): 252–260.
43.
SchuldtJPSchwarzN (2010) The “organic” path to obesity? Organic claims influence calorie judgments and exercise recommendations. Judgment and Decision Making5(3): 144–150.
44.
SeyfangG (2006) Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: Examining local organic food networks. Journal of Rural Studies22(4): 383–395.
45.
ShimpTASharmaS (1987) Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research24(3): 280–289.
TajfelH (1978) Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In: TajfelH (éd.) Differentiation between Social Groups. London: Academic Press, pp. 61–76.
48.
ThilmanyDBondCBondJ (2008) Going local: Exploring consumer behaviour and motivations for direct food purchases. American Journal of Agricultural Economics90(5): 1303–1309.
49.
TregearA (2011) Progressing knowledge in alternative and local food networks: Critical reflections and a research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies27(4): 419–430.
50.
TropeYLibermanNWakslakC (2007) Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation prediction evaluation and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology17(2): 83–95.
51.
Van IttersumKCandelMMMeulenbergMG (2003) The influence of the image of a product’s region of origin on product evaluation. Journal of Business Research56(3): 215–226.
52.
VerleghP (2007) Home country bias in product evaluation: The complementary roles of economic and sociopsychological motives. Journal of International Business Studies38(3): 361–373.
53.
VerleghPSteenkampJ (1999) A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology20(5): 521–546.
54.
WansinkBChandonP (2006) Can ‘low-fat’ nutrition labels lead to obesity?Journal of Marketing Research43(4): 605–617.
55.
WhiteKMacDonnellRDahlDW (2011) It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research48(3): 472–485.
56.
ZhangYKhareA (2009) The impact of accessible identities on the evaluation of global versus local products. Journal of Consumer Research36(3): 524–537.
57.
ZhaoXLynchJGJrChenQ (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research37(2): 197–206.
