Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-9
Effects of message framing on intentions towards the Pap test: Moderation by the objective of the recommended behavior,mediated by the valence of mental imagery
This experimental research examines the effect of message framing (gains vs losses) for a health communication promoting Pap smears on behavioral intentions in a new way: by suggesting a moderation by the objective of the recommended behavior (prevention vs detection), which is, in turn, mediated by the valence (positive vs negative) of mental images. An experiment conducted on 271 women highlights that message framing affects behavioral intentions when the recommended behavior is detection-related. These effects are explained through the valence of visual mental images. The results are discussed, and avenues for further research, especially those arising from the study limitations, are proposed.
Ashton-JamesCETracyJL (2012) Pride and prejudice: How feelings about the self influence judgments of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38(4): 466–476.
2.
BalboLJeannotF (2015) The fit between message framing and temporal distance: An efficient way to promote an innovative product. Recherche et Applications en Marketing30(2): 1–22.
3.
BanksSMSaloveyPGreenerSRothmanAJMoyerABeauvaisJEpelE (1995) The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology14(2): 178–184.
4.
BasemanJGKoutskyLA (2005) The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections. Journal of Clinical Virology, 32(1): 16–24.
5.
BettsGH (1909) The distribution of functions of mental imagery. New York, Teachers college, Columbia University.
6.
BlockLGKellerPA (1995) When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research32(2): 192–203.
7.
BloomPNovelliW (1981) Problems and challenges in social marketing. Journal of Marketing45(2): 79–88.
8.
Boesen-MarianiSGomezPGavard-PerretML (2010) Regulatory focus: A promising concept for marketing research. Recherche et Applications en Marketing25(1): 87–106.
9.
BonePFEllenPS (1990) The effect of imagery processing and imagery content on behavioral intentions. Advances in Consumer Research17: 449–454.
BrehonnetR (2013) Le placement de produits alcoolisés dans les films et son impact sur l’incitation à consommer: le rôle du médiateur de l’imagerie mentale. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest.
12.
BurdEM (2003) Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Clinical Microbiology Reviews16(1): 1–17.
13.
BurnsACBiwasARoachS (1991) The effects of advertising stimulus concreteness and familiarity on consumer attitudes and intentions. Academy of Marketing Science14: 17–20.
14.
ChabrolGDiligeartG (2004) Prévention et risques routiers: réguler la peur et/ou la menace?Questions de communication5(1): 15–132.
15.
ChamardC (2000) De la compréhension du processus d’imagerie mentale à l’analyse de ses effets en communication persuasive : une application au cas des annonces presse. Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris.
16.
CharryKPécheuxC (2011) Children and promoting a healthy diet: A study on the effectiveness of using threats in advertising. Recherche et Applications en Marketing26(2): 3–28.
17.
ChebatJCLimogesFGélinas-ChebatC (1998) Limits of the effects of advertisement framing: The moderating effects of prior knowledge and involvement. In: AlbaJWWesley HutchinsonJ (eds) Advances in Consumer Research, 25. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 324–333.
18.
ChildersTLHoustonMJ (1983) Imagery paradigm for consumer research: Alternative perspectives from cognitive psychology. In: BagozziRPTyboutAM (eds) Advances in Consumer Research, 10. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 59–64.
19.
ChildersTLHoustonMJ (1984) Conditions for a picture superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research11(2): 643–655.
20.
ChildersTLHoustonMJHecklerSE (1985) Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research12(2): 125–134.
21.
ConwayK (1996) Attitudes to Papanicolaou smears. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetric Gynecology17(4): 189–194.
22.
CotteJRitchieR (2005) Advertisers’ theories of consumers: Why use negative emotions to sell. Advances in Consumer Research32: 24–31.
23.
CoxDCoxA (2001) Communicating the consequences of early detection: The role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing65(3): 91–103.
24.
DenisM (1989) Image et cognition. Paris: PUF Collection Psychologie d’aujourd’hui.
25.
DerbaixC (1975) Les réactions des consommateurs à la communication publicitaire et la hiérarchie des effets. Revue Française de Marketing58: 7–26.
26.
DerbaixC (1987) Le comportement de l’acheteur: voies d’études pour les années à venir. Recherche et Applications en Marketing2(2): 81–92.
27.
DerbaixCPhamMT (1989) Pour un développement des mesures de l’affectif en marketing: synthèse des prérequis. Recherche et Applications en Marketing4(4): 71–87.
28.
DerbaixCPoncinIDroulersORoulletB (2012) Measuring affective reactions induced by social campaigns: Complementarity and convergence of iconic and verbal measures. Recherche et Applications en Marketing27(2): 71–90.
29.
DetweilerJBBedellBTProninERothmanAJ (1999) Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology18(2): 189–196.
30.
Ein-GarDShivBTormalaZL (2012) When blemishing leads to blossoming: The positive effect of negative information. Journal of Consumer Research38(5): 846–859.
31.
FriestadMWrightP (1994) The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research21(1): 1–31.
32.
FoxKKotlerP (1980) The marketing of social causes: The first 10 years. Journal of Marketing44(4): 24–33.
33.
GallagherKMUpdegraffJA (2012) Health message framing effects on attitudes intentions and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine43: 101–116.
34.
Gallopel-MorvanK (2006) L’utilisation de la peur dans un contexte de marketing social: état de l’art, limites et voies de recherche. Recherche et Applications en Marketing21(4): 41–60.
35.
Gavard-PerretML (1991), La présence humaine dans l’image, facteur d’efficacité de la communication publicitaire ? Une expérimentation dans le domaine du tourisme. Doctoral thesis, Université des Sciences Sociales de Grenoble, Grenoble.
36.
Gavard-PerretMLHelme-GuizonA (2003) L’imagerie mentale: un concept à (re)découvrir pour ses apports en marketing. Recherche et Applications en Marketing18(4): 59–79.
37.
GerendMAShepherdJE (2007) Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology26(6): 745–752.
38.
GirandolaF (2000) Peur et persuasion : Présentations des recherches et d’une nouvelle lecture. L’année psychologique100: 333–376.
39.
GomezPBorgesAPechmannC (2013) Avoiding poor health or approaching good health: Does it matter? The conceptualization, measurement, and consequences of health regulatory focus. Journal of Consumer Psychology23(4): 451–463.
40.
GregoryWLCialdiniRBCarpenterKM (1982) Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43(1): 590–595.
41.
GutmanE (1988) The role of individual differences and multiple senses in consumer imagery processing: Theoretical perspectives. Advances in Consumer Research15: 191–196.
42.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press, New York, London.
43.
Helme-GuizonA (1997) Image, imagerie mentale et effets de la communication persuasive: application à une œuvre d’art incluse dans une annonce publicitaire. Doctoral thesis, Université de Paris Dauphine, Paris.
44.
HigginsET (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist52: 1280–1300.
45.
HolbrookMBHirschmanEC (1982) The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies feelings and fun. Journal of Consumer Research9(2): 132–140.
46.
HolmesEAMathewsA (2005) Mental imagery and emotion: A special relationship?Emotion5(4): 489–497.
47.
HolmesEAMathewsA (2010) Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders. Clinical Psychology Review30(3): 349–362.
48.
HolmesEA.MathewsADalgleishTMackintoshB (2006) Positive interpretation training: Effects of mental imagery versus verbal training on positive mood. Behavior Therapy37(3): 237–247.
49.
HoustonMJChildersTLHecklerSE (1987) Picture-word consistency and the elaborative processing of advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research24(4): 359–369.
50.
JanisILFeschbachS (1953) Effects of fear-arousing communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Pyschology48(1): 78–92.
51.
JanisILLeventhalH (1968) Human reactions to stress. In: BorgattaEFLambertWW (eds) Handbook of personality theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1041–1085.
52.
KalichmanSCColeyB (1995) Context framing to enhance HIV-antibody-testing messages targeted to African American womenHealth Psychology14(3): 247–254.
53.
KellerPA (2006) Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research33(1): 109–114.
54.
KellerPALipkusIMRimerBK (2003) Affect framing and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research40(1): 54–64.
55.
KhanMJCastlePELorinczATWacholderSShermanMScottDRRushBBGlassAGSchiffmanM (2005) The elevated 10-years risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing in clinical practice. Journal of National Cancer Institute97(14): 1072–1079.
56.
KieneSMBatraWDZelenskiJMCothranDL (2005) Why are you bringing up condoms now? The effect of message content on framing effects of condom use messages. Health Psychology24(3): 321–326.
57.
KimHRaoARLeeAY (2009) It’s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research35(6): 877–889.
58.
KimYJ (2006) The role of regulatory focus in message framing in antismoking advertisements for adolescents. Journal of Advertising35(1): 143–151.
59.
KisielusJSternthalB (1984) Detecting and explaining vividness effects in attitudinal judgments. Journal of Marketing Research21(1): 54–64.
60.
KisielusJSternthalB (1986) Examining the vividness controversy: An availability-valence interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research12(4): 418–431.
61.
KotlerPZaltmanG (1971) Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing35(3): 3–12.
62.
KühbergerA (1998) The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes75(1): 23–55.
63.
LaczniakGLuschRMurphyP (1979) Social marketing: Its ethical dimensions. Journal of Marketing43(2): 29–36.
64.
LabrooAALeeAY (2006) Between two brands: A goal fluency account of brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research43(3): 374–385.
65.
LaoA (2013) Mental imagery and its determinants as factors of consumers emotional and behavioural responses: Situation analysis in online shopping. Recherche et Applications en Marketing28(3): 58–81.
66.
LatimerAERiversSRenchTAKatulakNHicksAHodorowskiJKHigginsTESaloveyP (2008a) A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fit messages for promoting physical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44(3): 826–832.
67.
LatimerAEWilliams-PiehotaPKatulakNACoxAMowadLHigginsETSaloveyP (2008b) Promoting fruit and vegetable intake through messages tailored to individual differences in regulatory focus. Annals of Behavioral Medicine35(3): 363–369.
68.
LatimerAESaloveyPRothmanAJ (2007) The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behavior: Is all hope lost?Journal of Health Communication12(7): 645–649.
69.
LeeAYAakerJL (2004) Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology86(2): 205–218.
70.
LeventhalH (1971) Fear appeals and persuasion: The differentiation of a motivational construct. American Journal of Public Health61(6): 1208–1224.
71.
LevinIPSchneiderSLGaethGJ (1998) All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes76(2): 149–188.
72.
LutzKALutzRJ (1978) Imagery-eliciting strategies: Review and implications of research. Advances in Consumer Research5: 611–620.
73.
MacInnisDJPriceLL (1987) The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. Journal of Consumer Research13(4): 473–491.
74.
MaheswaranDMeyers-LevyJ (1990) The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research27(3): 361–367.
75.
MarchioliA (2006) Marketing social et efficacité des campagnes de prévention de santé publique: apports et implications des récents modèles de la communication persuasive. Communication et Marketing1(1): 17–36.
76.
MeyerowitzBEChaikenS (1987) The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes intentions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52(3): 500–510.
77.
Meyers-LevyJMaheswaranD (2004) Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic heuristic or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology14(1): 159–167.
78.
MillerDWHadjimarcouJMiciakA (2000) A scale for measuring advertisement-evoked mental imagery. Journal of Marketing Communications6(1): 1–20.
79.
MoormanC (2002) Consumer health under the scope. Journal of Consumer Research29(1): 152–158.
80.
MullerDJuddCMYzerbytVY (2005) When moderation is mediated and mediation moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(6): 852–863.
81.
MyersJR (2009) The persuasion effects and mechanisms of vivid imagery inducing strategies in negative health messages: Exploring the roles of motivation, affect, and message substance. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, USA.
82.
NanX (2007a) The relative persuasive effect of gain- versus loss-framed messages: Exploring the moderating role of the desirability of end-states. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly84(3): 509–524.
83.
NanX (2007b) Social distance framing and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research33(4): 489–514.
84.
O’ConnorDBWarttigSConnerMLawtonR (2009) Raising awareness of hypertension risk through a web-based framing intervention: Does consideration of future consequences make a difference?Psychology Health and Medicine14(2): 213–219.
85.
O’KeefeDJensenJ (2006) The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Communication Yearbook30: 1–43.
86.
O’KeefeDJensenJ (2007) The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication12(7): 623–644.
87.
O’KeefeDJensenJ (2008) Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies59: 51–67.
88.
O’KeefeDJensenJ (2009) The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication59: 296–316.
89.
OliverRLRobertsonTSMitchellDJ (1993) Imaging and analyzing in response to new product advertising. Journal of Advertising22(4): 35–50.
90.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1984) Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research11: 668–672.
91.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology19: 123–205.
92.
RichardsonA (1969) Mental imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
93.
RiversSEPizarroDASchneiderTRPizarroJSaloveyP (2005) Message framing and Pap test utilization among women attending a community health clinic. Journal of Health Psychology10(1): 67–79.
94.
RogersR W (1975) A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology91: 93–114.
95.
RogersRW (1983) Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In: CacioppoJTPettyRE (eds) Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook. New York: Guilford Press, 153–177.
96.
RogersRW (1985) Attitude change and information integration in fear appeals. Psychological Reports56(1): 179–182.
97.
RothmanAJSaloveyP (1997) Shaping perception to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychology Bulletin121(1): 3–19.
98.
RothmanAJUpdegraffJA (2010) Specifying when and how gain- and loss-framed messages motivate healthy behavior: An integrated approach. In: KerenG (ed.) Perspectives on framing. London: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis, 257–278.
99.
RothmanAJBartelsRDWlaschinJSaloveyP (2006) The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication56(1): 202–220.
100.
RothmanAJMartinoSCBedellBTDetweilerJBSaloveyP (1999) The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25(5): 1355–1369.
101.
RothmanAJSaloveyPAntoneCKeoughKMartinCD (1993) The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology29(5): 408–433.
102.
RothschildML (1979) Marketing communications in nonbusiness situations or why it’s so hard to sell brotherhood like soap. Journal of Marketing43(2): 11–20.
103.
RouxD (2007) Consumer resistance: Proposal for an integrative framework. Recherche et Applications en Marketing22(4): 59–79.
104.
ShaoW (2012) Framing and efficacy: The effect of regulatory fit on skin cancer prevention and detection. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing24: 161–180.
105.
ShikaryTBernsteinDIJinYZimetGDRosenthalSLKahnJA (2009) Epidemiology and risk factors for human papillomavirus infection in a diverse sample of low-income young women. Journal of Clinical Virology46(2): 107–111.
106.
ShivBEdell BrittonJAPayneJW (2004) Does elaboration increase or decrease the effectiveness of negatively vs positively framed messages?Journal of Consumer Research31(1): 199–208.
107.
TaylorSE (1991) Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin110 (1): 67–85.
108.
TollBAO’MalleySKatulakNAWuRDubinJALatimerAMeandzijaBGeorgeTPJatlowPCooneyJLSaloveyP (2007) Comparing gain- and loss-framed messages for smoking cessation with sustained-release bupropion: A randomized controlled trialPsychology of Addictive Behaviors21(4): 534–544.
109.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science211(4481): 453–458.
110.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1986) Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business59(4): 251–278.
111.
UnnavaHAgarwalSHaugtvedtCP (1996) Interactive effects of presentation modality and message-generated imagery on recall of advertising information. Journal of Consumer Research23(1): 81–88.
112.
UpdegraffJAEmanuelASGallagherKMSteinmanCT (2011) Framing flu prevention: An experimental field test of signs promoting hand hygiene during the 2009–2010 H1N1 pandemic. Health Psychology30(3): 295–299.
113.
WerleCOCBoesen-MarianiSGavard-PerretMLBerthaudS (2012) Preventing youth obesity: The efficacy of the social risk argument on eating intentions and behaviors. Recherche et Applications en Marketing27(3): 3–27.
114.
WitteK (1992) Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs59(4): 329–349.
115.
WitteK (1994) Fear control and danger control: A test of the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). Communication Monographs61(2): 113–134.
116.
WitteK (1998) Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the Extended Parallel Process Model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In: AndersenPAGuerreroLK (eds) The Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 423–450.
117.
WitteKAllenM (2000) A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public campaigns. Health Education and Behavior27(5): 591–615.
118.
WitvlietCVOVranaSR (2000) Emotional imagery, the visual startle, and covariation bias: An affective matching account. Biological Psychology52: 187–204.
119.
WrightP (2002) Marketplace metacognition and social intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research28(4): 677–683.
120.
ZhaoGPechmannC (2007) The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents’ response to antismoking advertising campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research44(4): 671–687.
121.
ZhaoXLynchJGChenQ (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research37(2): 197–206.
122.
ZhuRMeyers-LevyJ (2007) Exploring the cognitive mechanism that underlies regulatory focus effects. Journal of Consumer Research34(1): 89–96.
