The aim of this paper is to clarify the concept of generation in marketing that gave rise to fruitful research, albeit very heterogeneous. Our approach consists in a presentation of these various explorations against the integrative framework offered by sociology in order to assess their ability to take into account the different dimensions that characterize the generation concept. This analysis contributes to the identification of new research areas that could add significantly to the literature on the generation concept.
AndreasenA.R. (1984), Life status changes and changes in consumer preferences, Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 3, 784–794.
2.
Attias-DonfutC. (1988), Sociologie des générations, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, Le Sociologue.
3.
Attias-DonfutC. (2000), Rapport des géné rations, transferts intrafamiliaux et dynamique macrosociale, Revue Française de Sociologie, 41, 4, 643–684.
4.
AuditA., DanardN., and TassiP. (2000), Age et diversité des comportements des téléspectateurs, Décisions Marketing, 19, 61–74.
5.
AuerbachA.J., KotlikoffL.J., and LeibfritzW. (Eds.) (1999), Generational accounting around the world, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
6.
BachmanG.R., Roedder JohnD., and RaoA.R. (1993), Children susceptibility to peer group purchase influence: An exploratory investigation, Advances in Consumer Research, eds. McAlisterL. and RothschildM.L., Provo, Utah, 20, 463–468.
7.
BakerS.M. and KennedyP.F. (1994), Death by nostalgia: A diagnosis of context-specific cases, Advances in Consumer Research, 21, eds. AllenC.T. and Roedder JohnD., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 169–174.
8.
BaltesP.B., HayneB.R., and LewisP.L. (1980), Life-span developmental psychology, Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65–110.
9.
BarakB. and GouldS. (1985), Alternative age measures: A research agenda, Advances in Consumer Research, 12, eds. HirschmanE. and HolbrookM., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 53–58.
10.
BarakB. and SchiffmanL.G. (1981), Cognitive age: A non chronological age variable, Advances in Consumer Research, 8, ed. MonroeK., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 602–606.
11.
BartosR. (1980), Over 49: The invisible consumer market, Harvard Business Review, 58, 1, 140–148.
12.
BaumgartnerH. (1992), Remembrance of things past: Music, autobiographical memory, and emotion, Advances in Consumer Research, 19, eds. SherryJ.F.Jr. and SternthalB., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 613–620.
13.
BereyL.A. and PollayR.W. (1968), Influence of the child in family decision making, Journal of Marketing Research, 5, 1, 70–72.
14.
BergadaàM. (1988), Le temps et le comportement de l'individu (première partie), Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 3, 4, 57–72.
15.
BergadaàM. (1989), Le temps et le comportement de l'individu (deuxième partie), Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 4, 1, 37–55.
16.
BlockP.M. and SchultzD.E. (2009), Media Generations, media allocation in a consumer-controlled market place, Worthington, Prosper Publishing.
17.
BowlbyJ. (1979), The making and breaking of affectional bonds, London, Tavistock.
18.
BréeJ. (1990), Les enfants et la consommation: Un tour d'horizon des recherches, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 5, 1, 43–70.
19.
BréeJ. (1993), Les enfants, la consommation et le marketing, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, Gestion.
20.
CaselliG., VallinJ. and WunschG. (2001), Démographie: analyse et synthèse, Paris, Editions de l'Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques.
21.
ChebatJ.C. (1983), La Sainte Famille, Revue Française de Marketing, 94, 95–102.
22.
ChauvelL. (1998), Le destin des générations, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
23.
ChauvelL. (2006), Les nouvelles générations devant la panne prolongée de l'ascenseur social, Revue de l'OFCE, 96.1, 35–50.
24.
ColeC., LaurentG., DroletA., EbertJ., GutchessA., Lambert-PandraudR., MulletE., NortonM.I., and PetersE. (2008), Decision making and brand choice by older consumers, Marketing Letters, 19, 3/4, 355–365.
25.
CovaV. and CovaB. (2001), Alternatives Marketing, Paris, Dunod.
26.
DavisH.L. (1970), Dimensions of marital roles in decision making, Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 2, 168–177.
27.
DavisH.L. and RigauxB.P. (1974), Perceptions of marital roles in decision process, Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 1, 51–61.
28.
DerbaixC. and LeheutE. (2008), Adolescents: Implication envers les produits et attitude envers les marques, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 23, 2, 37–66.
29.
DerbaixC. and PecheuxC. (1997), L'implication et l'enfant: Proposition d'une échelle de mesure, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 12, 1, 45–70.
30.
Dutta-BergmanM.J. (2006), The demographic and psychographic antecedents of attitude toward advertising, Journal of Advertising Research, 46, 1, 102–112.
31.
EnsleyE.E. and PrideW.M. (1991), Advertisement pacing and the learning of marketing information by the elderly, Psychology and Marketing, 8, 1, 1–20.
32.
Folkman CurasiC., PriceL.L., and ArnouldE.J. (2004), How individuals' cherished possessions become families' inalienable wealth, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 3, 609–622.
33.
Fosse-GomezM.-H. (1991), L'adolescent dans la prise de décision économique de la famille, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 6, 4, 100–118.
34.
FoxmanE.R. and TansuhajP.S. (1988), Adolescents' and mothers' perceptions of relative influence in family purchase decisions: Patterns of agreement and disagreement, Advances in Consumer Research, 15, ed. HoustonM. J., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 449–453.
35.
FoxmanE.R., TansuhajP.S., and EkstromK.M. (1989), Family members' perceptions of adolescents' influence in family decision making, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 4, 482–491.
36.
FukudaK. (2010), A cohort analysis of household vehicle expenditure in the U.S. and Japan: A possibility of generational marketing, Marketing letters, 21, 1, 53–64.
37.
GallandO. (1997), Sociologie de la jeunesse, Paris, Armand Colin.
38.
GolletyM. (1999), Lorsque parents et enfants s'apprennent mutuellement à consommer, Décisions Marketing, 18, 69–80.
39.
GolletyM. (2007), La famille, un lieu d'échanges privilégiés pour apprendre à consommer, in J. Brée (coord.), Kids Marketing, Paris, EMS.
40.
GornG.J., GoldbergM.E., ChattopadhyayA., and LitvackD. (1991), Music and information in commercials: Their effects with an elderly sample, Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 5, 23–32.
41.
GuiotD. (2001a), Tendance d'âge subjectif: Quelle validité prédictive?, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 16, 1, 25–43.
42.
GuiotD. (2001b), Antecedents of subjective age biases among senior women, Psychology and Marketing, 18, 10, 1049–1071.
43.
GuiotD. (2006), Un cadre d'analyse du processus de vieillissement et de son influence sur le comportement d'achat du consommateur âgé, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 21, 1, 57–79.
44.
HarrisJ.R. (1995), Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development, Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.
45.
HavlenaW.J. and HolakS.J. (1996), Exploring nostalgia imagery through the use of consumer collage, Advances in Consumer Research, 23, eds. CorfmanK.P. and LynchJ.G.Jr., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 35–42.
46.
HeilbrunnB. (1999), Les marques transgénérationnelles, Décisions Marketing, 18, 81–84.
47.
HeslopL.A. and MarshallJ. (1990), Prise de décision jointe chez les couples âgés: Un schéma d'étude, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 5, 3, 27–52.
48.
HolbrookM.B. and SchindlerR.M. (1989), Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes, Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 1, 119–124.
49.
JaworskiB. and SauerW.J. (1985), Cohort variation, Advances in Consumer Research, 12, eds. HirschmanE. and HolbrookM., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 32–36.
50.
KertzerD.I. (1983), Generation as a sociological problem, Annual Review of Sociology, eds. TurnerR.H. and ShortJ.F.Jr., Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc., 125–149.
51.
LadweinR., CartonA., and SévinE. (2009), Le capital transgénérationnel: La transmission des pratiques de consommation de la mère à la fille, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 24, 2, 1–27.
52.
LagréeJ.-C. and Lew-FayP. (1991), Différences historiques, différences sociales: L'entrée en activité comme marqueur générationnel, Générations, Annales de Vaucresson, 30-31, 127–148.
53.
Lambert-PandraudR. (2000), Le rachat de la marque précédente par les consommateurs âgés: Une synthèse des recherches en marketing, en psychologie sociale et cognitive et en gérontologie, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 15, 4, 21–42.
54.
Lambert-PandraudR., LapersonneE., and LaurentG., (2005), Repeat purchasing of new automobiles by older consumers: Empirical evidence and interpretations, Journal of Marketing, 69, 2, 97–113.
55.
Lambert-PandraudR. and LaurentG. (2010), Why do older consumers buy older brands? The role of attachment and declining innovativeness, Journal of Marketing, 74, 5, 104–121.
56.
LazerW. (1986), Dimensions of the mature market, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 3, 3, 23–34.
57.
LorenzK. (1989), Les oies cendrées, Paris, Albin Michel.
58.
MathurA., MoschisG.P., and LeeE. (2003), Life events and brand preferences changes, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3, 2, 129–141.
59.
MathurA., ShermanE., and SchiffmanL.G. (1998), Opportunities for marketing travel services to new-age elderly, Journal of Services Marketing, 12, 4, 265–277.
60.
MeredithG. and ScheweC.D. (1994), The power of cohorts, American Demographics, 16, 12, 22–31.
61.
MokC.F.J., WangH., and HannaS.D. (1994), Are consumption patterns of elderly households consistent with a life-cycle model?Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 513–517.
62.
Moore-ShayE.S. and BerchmansB.M. (1996), The role of family environment in the development of shared consumption values: An intergenerational study, Advances in Consumer Research, 23, eds. CorfmanK. and LynchJ.G.Jr., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 484–490.
63.
MooreE.S. and BowmanG.D. (2006), Of friends and family: How do peers affect the development of intergenerational influences, Advances in Consumer Research, 33, eds. PechmannC. and PriceL., Duluth, MN, Association for Consumer Research, 536–541.
64.
Moore-ShayE.S. and LutzR.J. (1988), Intergenerational influences in the formation of consumer attitudes and beliefs about the market place: Mothers and daughters, Advances in Consumer Research, 15, ed. HoustonM.J., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 461–467.
65.
Moore-ShayE.S., WilkieW.L., and LutzR.J. (2002), Passing the torch: Intergenerational influences as a source of brand equity, Journal of Marketing, 66, 2, 17–37.
66.
MooreR.L. and MoschisG.P. (1981), The role of family communication in consumer learning, Journal of Communication, 31, 4, 42–51.
67.
MoschisG.P. (1996), Gerontographics: life stage segmentation for marketing strategy, Westport, Quorum Books.
68.
MoschisG.P., LeeE. and MathurA. (1997), Targeting the mature market: Opportunities and challenges, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14, 4, 282–293.
69.
MoschisG.P. and MooreR.L. (1979), Decision making among the young: A socialization perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 2, 101–112.
70.
MunizA.M. and O'GuinnT.C. (2001), Brand community, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 4, 412–432.
71.
MuratoreI. (2008), L'adolescent, les pairs et la socialisation: éthographie d'une cours de récréation, Revue Française du Marketing, 216, 1, 43–60.
72.
NobleS.M. and ScheweC.D. (2003), Cohort segmentation: An exploration of its validity, Journal of Business Research, 56, 12, 979–987.
73.
PerrienJ., RoyJ., GuiotD., and BastinE. (1998), Exploring the persuasive effects of a commercial for a pharmaceutical product: The elderly vs. young adults, Advances in Consumer Research, 25, eds. AlbaJ.W. and HutchinsonJ.W., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 513–517.
74.
PréelB. (2000), Le choc des générations, Paris, La Découverte, Cahiers Libres.
75.
RamS. (1987), A model of innovation resistance, Advances in Consumer Research, 14, eds. WallendorfM. and AndersonP., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 208–212.
76.
RecoursF., HébelP., and BergerR. (2008), Effets de générations, d'âge et de revenus sur les arbitrages de consommation, Cahier de recherche CREDOC, 258.
77.
RentzJ.O. and ReynoldsF.D. (1980), Separating age, cohort and period effects in consumer behavior, Advances in Consumer Research, 8, ed. MonroeK.B., Washington, DC, 596–601.
78.
RentzJ.O. and ReynoldsF.D. (1991), Forecasting the effects of an aging population on product consumption: An age-period-cohort framework, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 3, 355–360.
79.
RentzJ.O., ReynoldsF.D., and StoutR.G. (1983), Analyzing changing consumption patterns with cohort analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 1, 12–20.
80.
Rigaux-BricmontB. (1977), L'influence des enfants dans les décisions économiques de la famille, Revue Française de Marketing, 71, Nov.-Dec., 33–43.
81.
RileyM.W., FonerA., and WaringJ. (1988), Sociology of age, in Handbook of Sociology, ed. SmelserN., Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 243–290.
82.
RindfleischA. (1994), Cohort generational influences on consumer socialization, Advances in Consumer Research, 21, eds. AllenC.T. and Roedder JohnD. (coord.), Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 470–476.
83.
RyderN.B. (1965), The cohort as a concept in the study of social change, American Sociological Review, 30, 6, 843–861.
84.
SamuelO. (2008), Les démographes et le temps, Temporalités, 8.
85.
SchumanH. and ScottJ. (1989), Generations and collective memories, American Sociological Review, 54, 3, 359–381.
86.
ShahR.H. and MittalB. (1997), Toward a theory of intergenerational influence in consumer behavior: An exploratory essay, Advances in Consumer Research, 24, eds. BruckisM. and MacInnisD.J. (coord.), Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 55–60.
87.
ShermanE., SchiffmanL.G., and MathurA. (2001), The influence of gender on the new age elderly's consumption orientation, Psychology and Marketing, 18, 10, 1073–1089.
88.
SmithR.B. and MoschisG.P. (1984), Consumer socialization of the elderly, Advances in Consumer Research, 11, ed. KinnearT.C., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 548–552.
89.
SorceP., LoomisL., and TylerP.R. (1989), Intergenerational influence on consumer decision making, Advances in Consumer Research, 16, ed. SrullT.K., Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 271–275.
90.
SorceP., TylerP.R., and LoomisL.M. (1989), Life styles of older Americans, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6, 3, 53–63.
91.
StraussW. and HoweN. (1998), The fourth turning, New York, Broadway Books.
92.
SudburyL. and SimcockP. (2009), Understanding older consumers through cognitive age and the list of values: A U.K.-based perspective, Psychology and Marketing, 26, 1, 22–38.
93.
SzmiginI. and CarriganM. (2001), Time, consumption and the older consumer: An interpretive study of the cognitively young, Psychology and Marketing, 18, 10, 1091–1116.
94.
TongrenH.N. (1988), Determinant behavior characteristics of older consumers, The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2, 1, 136–157.
95.
UnclesM.D. and EhrenbergA.S.C. (1990), Brand choice among older consumers, Journal of Advertising Research, 30, 4, 19–22.
96.
UrienB. and GuiotD. (2007), Attitude face à la mort et comportement d'ajustement des consommateurs âgés: Vers l'élaboration d'une réponse marketing, Décisions Marketing, 46, 23–35.
WardS., WackmanD.B., and WartellaE. (1977), How children learn to buy: the development of consumer information processing skills, Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.
99.
WellsW.D. and GubarG. (1966), Life cycle concept in marketing research, Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 4, 355–363.
100.
WilkesR.E. (1992), A structural modeling approach to the measurement and meaning of cognitive age, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 2, 292–301.
101.
WilkesR.E. (1995), Household life-cycle stages, transitions, and product expenditures, Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1, 27–42.
102.
WilliamsP. and DroletA. (2005), Age related differences in response to emotional advertisements, Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 3, 343–354.
103.
ZeithamlV.A. and GillyM.C. (1987), Characteristics affecting the acceptance of retailing technologies: A comparison of elderly and non elderly consumers, Journal of Retailing, 63, 1, 49–68.
