This study examines the effect of ambush marketing disclosure on attitudes toward the ambusher's brand. The results of an experiment conducted to this end show that ambush disclosure negatively influences perceived integrity, affective response and purchase intention. Involvement in the event and attitudes toward sponsorship of an event both moderate consumers' response to ambush marketing.
AbbassiW. (2007), Efficacité du sponsoring sportif selon la condition d'exposition à l'événement, Doctoral dissertation, CERGAM, University Paul-Cézanne (Aix-Marseille III, IAE).
2.
BatraR.RayM.L. (1985), How advertising works at contact, in AlwittL.F.MitchellA.A. (eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects, Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum, 13–44.
3.
BatraR.StaymanD.M. (1990), The role of mood in advertising effectiveness, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 2, 203–214.
4.
BrechetA.DesmetP.de PechpeyrouP. (2005), Effets de l'annonce d'un prix multidimensionnel sur la confiance dans la marque, Proceedings of the 4e Congrès international des tendances en marketing, Paris.
5.
BrennanM.EsslemontD. (1994), The accuracy of the Juster scale for predicting purchase rates of branded, fast-moving consumer goods, Marketing Bulletin, 5, may, 47–53.
6.
BrennanM. (1995), Constructing demand curves from purchase probability data: An application of the Juster Scale, Marketing Bulletin, 6, may, 51–58.
7.
BressoudE. (2001), De l'intention d'achat au comportement: essais de modélisations incluant variables attitudinales, intra-personnelles et situationnelles, Doctoral dissertation, University Paris I – Panthéon Sorbonne.
8.
Comité National Olympique Sportif Français (2006), La protection des marques et du territoire olympiques, Conférence organisée par le CNOSF du 24 janvier 2006, Paris, France.
9.
CornwellT.B. (2008), State of the art and science in sponsorship-linked marketing, Journal of Advertising, 37, 3, 41–55.
10.
DaneshvaryR.SchwerR.K. (2000), The association endorsement and consumers' intention to purchase, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17, 3, 203–213.
11.
DayD.GanB. (1991), Predicting purchase behaviour, Marketing Bulletin, 2, may, 18–30.
12.
DerbaixC.GérardP.LardinoitT. (1994), Essai de conceptualisation d'une activité éminemment pratique: Le parrainage, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 9, 2, 43–67.
13.
DianouxC.HerrmannJ.-L.PoncinI.ZeitounH. (2006), La théorie de l'assimilation-contraste peut-elle contribuer à expliquer le fonctionnement des annonces comparatives?, Proceedings of the XXIIe Congrès de l'Association Française de Marketing, Nantes.
14.
Didellon-CarsanaL. (1997), Mode de persuasion et mesure d'efficacité du parrainage: une application au domaine sportif, Doctoral dissertation, ESA, Grenoble, University Pierre-Mendès-France.
15.
FarrellyF.J.QuesterP.G.GreyserS.A. (2005), Defending the co-branding benefits of sponsorship b2b partnerships: The case of ambush marketing, Journal of Advertising Research, 45, 3, 339–348.
16.
Fleck-DousteyssierN. (2007), Le parrainage: D'une intuition à une stratégie de communication, Décisions Marketing, 47, 7–20.
17.
FornellC.LarckerD.F. (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, 39–50.
18.
FuchsS. (2003), Le pseudo-parrainage: Une autre façon de faire du parrainage?, Décisions Marketing, 30, 31–39.
19.
GiannelloniJ.-L. (1993), L'influence de la communication par l'événement sur la nature de l'image de marque de l'entreprise, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 8, 1, 5–29.
20.
GreenwaldA.G.LeavittC. (1984), Audience involvement in advertising: Four levels, Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 1, 581–592.
21.
GurviezP.KorchiaM. (2002), Proposition d'une échelle de mesure multidimensionnelle de la confiance dans la marque, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 17, 3, 41–61.
22.
HarveyB. (2001), Measuring the effects of sponsorships, Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 1, 59–65.
23.
HoekJ.GendallP. (2002), Ambush marketing: More than just a commercial irritant?, Entertainment Law, 1, 2, 72–91.
24.
International Olympic Committee (1996), Marketing fact file 1996, Lausanne, IOC.
25.
JoharG.V.PhamM.T. (1999), Relatedness, prominence and constructive sponsor identification, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 3, 299–312.
26.
JoharG.V.PhamM.T. (2001), Market prominence biases in sponsor identification: Processes and conse-quentiality, Psychology et Marketing, 18, 2, 123–143.
27.
JusterF.T. (1966), Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61, 315, 658–696.
28.
KellerK.L. (2003), Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge, Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 4, 595–600.
29.
LardinoitT.DerbaixC. (2001), Sponsorship and recall of sponsors, Psychology et Marketing, 18, 2, 167–190.
30.
LardinoitT.QuesterP.G. (2001), Attitudinal effects of combined sponsorship and sponsor's prominence on basketball in Europe, Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 1, 48–57.
31.
LouisD. (2004), L'influence du parrainage sur l'attitude à l'égard du parrain: une comparaison off line/on line, Proceedings of the XXe Congrès International de l'AFM, Saint-Malo.
32.
LutzR.J. (1985), Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework, in AlwittL.F.MitchellA.A. (eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects: theory, research and applications, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 45–63.
33.
LybergerM.McCarthyL. (2001), An assessment of consumer knowledge of, interest in, and perceptions of ambush marketing strategies, Sport Marketing Quarterly, 10, 3, 130–137.
34.
MaddenN. (2007), Ambush marketing could hit new high at Beijing Olympics, Advertising Age, 23 july.
35.
MadrigalR. (2000), The influence of social alliances with sport teams on intentions to purchase corporate sponsors' products, Journal of Advertising, 29, 4, 13–24.
36.
MazodierM. (2008), Une étude exploratoire de l'attitude du public face à la révélation du pseudo-parrainage d'événements sportifs, Revue Européenne de Management du Sport, 23.
37.
MazodierM.ChandonJ.-L. (2005), L'impact du parrainage sportif sur la notoriété, l'attitude et l'intention d'achat: Effet modérateur des normes de groupe, du sexe et de l'âge, Revue Sciences de Gestion, 48, 65–87.
38.
McKelveyS. (1994), Sans legal restraint, no stopping brash, creative ambush marketers, Brandweek, 35, 20.
39.
MeenaghanT. (1994), Ambush marketing: Immoral or imaginative practice?, Journal of Advertising Research, 34, 5, 77–88.
40.
MeenaghanT. (1998), Ambush marketing: Corporate strategy and consumer reaction, Psychology et Marketing, 15, 4, 305–322.
41.
MeenaghanT. (2001), Sponsorship and advertising: A comparison of consumer perception, Psychology et Marketing, 18, 2, 191–215.
42.
MerleA. (2007), La valeur perçue de la customisation de masse: proposition et test d'un modèle conceptuel intégrateur, Doctoral dissertation, CERGAM, University Paul-Cézanne (Aix-Marseille III, IAE).
43.
OkterT.HayesP. (1988), Évaluation de l'efficacité du sponsoring. Expériences de la Coupe du monde de football 1986, Revue Française du Marketing, 118, 2, 13–39.
44.
PeterJ.P.ChurchillG.A.Jr.BrownT.J. (1993), Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 4, 655–662.
45.
QuesterP.G. (1997), Awareness as a measure of sponsorship effectiveness: The Adelaide formula one grand prix and evidence of incidental ambush effects, Journal of Marketing Communications, 3, 1, 1–20.
46.
QuesterP.G.ThompsonB. (2001), Advertising and promotion leverage on arts sponsorship effectiveness, Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 1, 33–47.
47.
RempelJ.K.HolmesJ.GZannaM.P. (1985), Trust in close relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1, 95–112.
48.
RieunierS. (2000), L'influence de la musique d'ambiance sur le comportement du consommateur sur le lieu de vente, Doctoral dissertation, DMSP, University Paris IX-Dauphine.
49.
SandlerD.M.ShaniD. (1989), Olympic sponsorship vs. ambush marketing: Who gets the gold?, Journal of Advertising Research, 29, 4, 9–14.
50.
ShaniD.SandlerD.M. (1998), Ambush marketing: Is confusion to blame for the flickering of the Flame?, Psychology et Marketing, 15, 4, 367–383.
51.
SharmaS.DurandR.M.Gur-ArieO. (1981), Identification and analysis of moderator variables, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 3, 291–300.
52.
SirgyJ.LeeD.-J.JoharJ.S.TidwellJ. (2008), Effect of self-congruity with sponsorship on brand loyalty, Journal of Business Research, 61, 10, 1091–1097.
53.
StippH.SchiavoneN.P. (1996), Modelling the impact of olympic sponsorship on corporate image, Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 4, 22–28.
54.
StrazzieriA. (1994), Mesurer l'implication durable indé-pendamment du risque perçu, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 9, 1, 73–91.
TrendelO.WarlopL. (2005), Présentation et applications des mesures implicites de restitution mémorielle en marketing, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 20, 2, 77–104.
VolleP. (1996), Impact du marketing promotionnel des distributeurs sur le choix du point de vente et rôle modérateur de variables individuelles, Doctoral dissertation, DMSP, University Paris IX-Dauphine.
60.
WalliserB. (2006), Le parrainage – sponsoring et mécénat, Paris, Dunod.
61.
WalliserB. (2003), L'évolution et l'état de l'art de la recherche internationale sur le parrainage, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 18, 1, 65–94.
62.
ZannaM.P.RempelJ.K. (1988), Attitudes: A new look at an old concept, in Bar-TalD.KruglanskiA. W. (eds.), The social psychology of knowledge, New York, Cambridge University Press, 315–334.
