Abstract
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and effectiveness of a previous mobile versus current on-site lithotripsy service at a tertiary referral centre.
Methods:
Patient demographics, stone properties and service provision data were collected; retrospectively for mobile extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy service (mESWL) between December 2017 and December 2018, and prospectively for on-site extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy service (osESWL) between March 2019 and March 2020.
Results:
The overall stone clearance rate for mESWL was 57.1% (68/119) and 79.2% (164/207) for osESWL (p < 0.01). The overall osESWL ureteric stone clearance was 86.5% (77/89). The renal stone clearance rate with osESWL was greater than mESWL; 73.7% (87/118) versus 55.9% (62/111), p < 0.01. Waiting time for osESWL treatment to renal calculi was significantly lower than mESWL (35 versus 47 days), p < 0.01. To achieve stone clearance, mESWL required a larger proportion (25/111, 22.5%) of additional procedures compared to osESWL (16/118, 13.6%), p = 0.08. There was no significant difference in complication rates with mESWL versus osESWL. Over 5 years, there was a projected cost saving of £627,030 with osESWL compared to £158,660 with mESWL.
Conclusion:
With increased treatment capacity, higher stone clearance rate and shorter waiting times, the on-site lithotripter delivers a better service compared to a visiting mobile lithotripter. Furthermore, it may cut costs in the long term.
Level of evidence:
Not applicable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
