Punctures versus shocks: a comparison of renal functional and structural changes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shockwave lithotripsy for solitary renal stone

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate renal functional and structural changes following percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shockwave lithotripsy for solitary non-obstructing non-staghorn renal stone.

Materials and methods:

Patients with solitary unilateral non-staghorn renal stones who were planned for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (20 patients) and shockwave lithotripsy (20 patients) were prospectively evaluated for renal functional and structural changes 60 days after the procedure and complete clearance of stones. Tc99-dimercaptosuccinic acid was used to assess cortical scarring and Tc99-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid and Tc99-levo levo ethylecysteine were used for glomerular filtration rate calculations, respectively.

Results:

The mean stone size was 24.4 mm and 13.7 mm in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group and the shockwave lithotripsy group, respectively. No new cortical scars developed in either of the groups on Tc99-dimercaptosuccinic acid scan. Both the treated and untreated kidneys showed an overall insignificant fall in glomerular filtration rate in both the groups. The number of patients showing significant deterioration in the individual glomerular filtration rate in both the treated and untreated renal unit was more in the shockwave lithotripsy group.

Conclusion:

Both percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shockwave lithotripsy are comparable in terms of adverse effects on renal parenchyma and renal function.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable for this multicentre audit.