The British Association of Urological Surgeons radical cystectomy audit 2014/2015: An update on current practice,and an analysis of the effect of centre and surgeon case volume

Abstract

Objective:

The Consultant Outcomes Publication has made it mandatory to submit surgeon-level data on radical cystectomy (RC) practice in England. The current analysis describes contemporary surgical practice and compares this by surgeon and centre case volume.

Materials and methods:

Between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2015, data on 3742 RCs performed by 161 surgeons over 84 centres were recorded on the British Association of Urological Surgeons audit and data platform. Centre case volumes were grouped as high (> 60), medium (30–60) and low (< 30), while surgeon case volumes were grouped as high (> 30), medium (8–30) and low (< 8). All data averages were for the combined 2-year period.

Results:

The median number of RCs performed was 16/surgeon and 31/centre; 45.4% of cases were performed for muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). The commonest performed urinary diversion was ileal conduit (85.2%), followed by orthotopic bladder substitution (5.7%). Open radical cystectomy (ORC) was performed in 67.8%, robotically-assisted cystectomy (RARC) in 20.6% and laparoscopic cystectomy (LRC) in 9.1% of cases. RARC was more likely to be performed by high-volume surgeons and centres. The majority of patients underwent a lymph node dissection (LND), with rates varying from 79.5% to 90.3%. Reported rates of high-grade complication were generally low across all groups, suggesting under-reporting. There was a trend towards higher reported transfusion rates as centre volumes decreased. The median length of stay (LOS) was 7–9 days for minimally invasive approaches compared to open surgery, which was 11–12 days. Mortality rates were low across all groups.

Conclusions:

Compliance with the data registry is high. ORC remains the most common approach. High-case volume surgeons and centres more commonly offer RARC. The majority of patients undergo LND. There is a trend towards higher reported rates of transfusion as centre volume decreases. LOS is shorter in RARC and LRC in comparison to ORC, but is otherwise similar across centres and surgeons.

Level of evidence:

2b