KavanaghAGLeeJCDonnellyB.Time to treatment of prostate cancer through the Calgary Prostate Institute rapid access clinic. Can J Urol2008; 15: 3975–3979.
FordeJCO’ConnorKMCaseyLet al. A rapid access diagnostic clinic for prostate cancer: The experience after one year. Ir J Med Sci2011; 180: 505–508.
5.
BoltonEMKellyBDQuinlanMRet al. Audit of rapid access introduction reveals high prevalence of prostate cancer in Western Region. Ir J Med Sci2014; 183: 173–179.
6.
O’KellyFThomasAZMurrayDet al. Emerging evidence for Gleason grade migration and distance impact in prostate cancer? An analysis of the rapid access prostate clinic in a tertiary referral center: St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin (2009–2011). Ir J Med Sci2013; 182: 487–491.
7.
OonSFCullenIMMoranDet al. The effect of a rapid access prostate cancer clinic on prostate cancer patient and disease characteristics, primary treatment and surgical workload. Ir J Med Sci2014; 183: 241–247.
8.
NguyenATTsaiCLHwangLYet al. Obesity and mortality, length of stay and hospital cost among patients with sepsis: A nationwide inpatient retrospective cohort study. PloS One2016; 11: e0154599.
9.
SerefogluECAltinovaSUgrasNSet al. How reliable is 12-core prostate biopsy procedure in the detection of prostate cancer?Can Urol Assoc J2013; 7: E293–E298.
10.
HuYAhmedHUCarterTet al. A biopsy simulation study to assess the accuracy of several transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-biopsy strategies compared with template prostate mapping biopsies in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy. BJU Int2012; 110: 812–820.
11.
KomaiYNumaoNYoshidaSet al. High diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer missed by transrectal 12-core biopsy. J Urol2013; 190: 867–873.
12.
BjurlinMACarterHBSchellhammerPet al. Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: Sampling, labeling and specimen processing. J Urol2013; 189: 2039–2046.
13.
WightASarkarRCreechLet al. Outcome of patients discharged from rapid access lung clinic (RALC) with non cancer diagnosis: Five year follow up. Eur Respir J2011; 38: 4425.
14.
GilmorePEShackleyDCClarkeNWet al. National review of urology outpatient practice in the UK. Postgrad Med J2005; 81: 55–57.
15.
O’KellyFManeckshaRPQuinlanDMet al. Rates of self-reported ‘burnout’ and causative factors amongst urologists in Ireland and the UK: A comparative cross-sectional study. BJU Int2016; 117: 363–372.
16.
ThavarajahNWongKZhangLet al. Continued success in providing timely palliative radiation therapy at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program: A review of 2008–2012. Curr Oncol2013; 20: e206–e211.
17.
de SaESinclairEMiteraGet al. Continued success of the rapid response radiotherapy program: A review of 2004–2008. Support Care Cancer2009; 17: 757–762.
18.
LamahMAhmadSMCharalampopoulosAet al. Three-year evaluation of a rapid-access coloproctology clinic. Dig Surg2000; 17: 150–153.
19.
RaczJMHollowayCMHuangWet al. Improving patient flow and timeliness in the diagnosis and management of breast abnormalities: The impact of a rapid diagnostic unit. Curr Oncol2016; 23: e260–e265.
20.
KazmiSMHHussainMLedsonMet al. Meeting the referral criteria to the rapid access lung cancer clinic: A 10-year audit. Eur Respir J2012; 40: 3140.
21.
GhoshAQasimAWoollcombeKet al. Cost implications of implementing NICE guideline on chest pain in rapid access chest pain clinics: An audit and cost analysis. J Public Health (Oxf)2012; 34: 397–402.
22.
National Cancer Registry Ireland. Cancer projections for Ireland 2015–2040. Cork: National Cancer Registry, 2014.
23.
DrummondFJBarrettEBurnsRet al. The number of tPSA tests continues to rise and variation in testing practices persists: A survey of laboratory services in Ireland 2008–2010. Ir J Med Sci2014; 183: 369–375.
