Abstract
Objective:
The objective of this study is to evaluate the utility of routine loopogram follow-up three months after cystectomy and urinary diversion in the early detection of benign ureteroileal anastomotic stricture (UAS).
Materials and methods:
A loopogram was incorporated into our standard follow-up three months after cystectomy and conduit urinary diversion in August 2010–December 2015. Data were maintained prospectively in a database.
Results:
A total of 250 patients (181 male; 69 female); median age of 70 years (range: 38–83) underwent cystectomy and conduit urinary diversion during this period. Of these, 167 (66.8%) had a routine loopogram at three months. Seven of 167 were confirmed to have a benign UAS. Twenty-three of 250 (9.2%) had an early loopogram prior to the planned three-month study in response to symptoms. Nine of 23 were diagnosed with benign UAS. Sixty of 250 (24%) did not have a routine loopogram for a variety of reasons. Five patients with normal three-month loopograms developed late strictures after a median time of 22 months (range 5–38).
In total 21/250 (8.4%) patients developed UAS. Stricture rates for the open, robotic and laparoscopic modalities were 8/129 (6.2%), 12/111 (10.8%) and 1/10 (10%) respectively. Five of seven of patients with early, asymptomatic UAS diagnosed on routine loopogram received treatment; four of five had improvement in renal function.
Conclusion:
Overall stricture rate in this series was 8.4%. The majority of UAS occur early and are more likely to be symptomatic. A policy of routine loopogram benefitted only 4/250 (1.6%) patients. We advocate the use of loopograms in cases with a high index of suspicion rather than for routine screening.
Level of evidence:
Not applicable for this multicentre audit.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
