Abstract
A comparison of European Association of Urology paediatric urology guidelines with British guidelines and best practice.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Gairdner
D.
The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision . BMJ 1949 ; 2 : 1433 .
2.British association of Paediatric Surgeons . Commisioning guide: Foreskin conditions, 2016 version . UK : Royal College of Surgeons England .
3.British Association of Paediatric Surgeons . Management of foreskin conditions consensus statement . http://www.baps.org.uk/content/uploads/2014/10/circumcision-final-may-2007.pdf (accessed 11 November 2017 ).
4.
Virtanen
HE
Bjerknes
R
Cortes
D
et al
. Cryptorchism: classification,prevalence and long-term consequences . Acta Paediatrica 2007 ; 96 : 611 –616 .
5.British Association of Paediatric Urologists . UDT Consensus statement . http://www.bapu.org.uk/udt-consensus-statement/ (accessed 11 November 2017 ).
6.
Schneck
F
et al
. Abnormalities of the testes and scrotum and their management . In Campbell’s Urology , 2002 edition.