DavisRJonesJSBarocasDA. Diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up of asymptomatic microhematuria (AMH) in adults: AUA guideline. J Urol2012; 188 (6 Suppl): 2473–2481.
2.
EdwardsTJDickinsonAJNataleS. A prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield resulting from the attendance of 4020 patients at a protocol-driven haematuria clinic. BJU Int2006; 97: 301–305.
BensonGSBrewerED. Hematuria: Algorithms for diagnosis II. Hematuria in the adult and hematuria secondary to trauma. JAMA1981; 246: 933–935.
7.
AntoniewiczAAZapalaLPoletajewS. Macroscopic hematuria – a leading urological problem in patients on anticoagulant therapy: Is the common diagnostic standard still advisable?ISRN Urol2012; 2012: 710734.
8.
NiallORussellJMacGregorR. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol1999; 161: 534–537.
9.
WangLJWongYCHuangCC. Multidetector computerized tomography urography is more accurate than excretory urography for diagnosing transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract in adults with hematuria. J Urol2010; 183: 48–55.
10.
Gray SearsCLWardJFSearsST. Prospective comparison of computerized tomography and excretory urography in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria. J Urol2002; 168: 2457–2460.
11.
DikranianAHPetittiDBShapiroCE. Intravenous urography in evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. J Endourol2005; 19: 595–597.
12.
WarshauerDMMcCarthySMStreetL. Detection of renal masses: Sensitivities and specificities of excretory urography/linear tomography, US, and CT. Radiology1988; 169: 363–365.
13.
MettlerFAJrHudaWYoshizumiTT. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology2008; 248: 254–263.
14.
JaffeJSGinsbergPCGillR. A new diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of microscopic hematuria. Urology2001; 57: 889–894.
15.
Jamis-DowCAChoykePLJenningsSB. Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: Detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation. Radiology1996; 198: 785–788.
KannTKubtaMSakamotoH. The efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of renal stone. Urology2014; 84: 285–288.
18.
RayAAGhiculeteDPaceKT. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology2010; 76: 295–300.
19.
CaubergECNioCYde la RosetteJM. Computed tomography-urography for upper urinary tract imaging: Is it required for all patients who present with hematuria?J Endourol2011; 25: 1733–1740.
20.
UnsalACaliskanEKErolH. The diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound guided imaging algorithm in evaluation of patients with hematuria. Euro J Radiol2011; 79: 7–11.
21.
DattaSNAllenGMEvansR. Urinary tract ultrasonography in the evaluation of haematuria – a report of over 1000 cases. Ann R Col Surg Engl2002; 84: 203–205.
22.
Rhéaume-LanoieJLepantoLFradetV. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound for macroscopic hematuria in the era of multidetector computed tomography urography. Can Assoc Radiol J2014; 65: 253–259.
23.
DevlinMHullGCouplandA. CT urography as first line investigation for haematuria: Is it truly indicated?J Clin Urol2015; 8: 390–395.
24.
SilvermanSGLeyendeckerJRAmisES. What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract?Radiology2009; 250: 309–323.
25.
NiemannTKollmannTBongartzG. Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: A meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol2008; 191: 396–401.
26.
BimbaumBAJacobsJERamchandaniP. Multiphasic renal CT: Comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Radiology1996; 200: 753–758.
27.
IsraelGMBosniakMA. How I do it: Evaluating renal masses. Radiology2005; 236: 441–450.
28.
SilvermanSGAkbarSAMorteleKJ. Multi-detector row CT urography of normal urinary collecting system: Furosemide versus saline as adjunct to contrast medium. Radiology2006; 240: 749–755.
29.
Van Der MolenAJCowanNCMueller-LisseUG. CT urography: Definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol2008; 18: 4–17.
30.
ChlapoutakisKTheocharopoulousNYarmenitisS. Performance of computed tomographic urography in diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, in patients presenting with hematuria: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Euro J Radiol2010; 73: 334–338.
31.
KnoxMKCowanNCRivers-BowermanMD. Evaluation of multidetector computed tomography urography and ultrasonography for diagnosing bladder cancer. Clin Radiol2008; 63: 1317–1325.
32.
BlickCGNazirSAMallettS. Evaluation of diagnostic strategies for bladder cancer using computed tomography (CT) urography, flexible cystoscopy and voided urine cytology: Results for 778 patients from a hospital haematuria clinic. BJU Int2012; 110: 84–94.
33.
BromageSJLiewMPMooreKC. The economic implications of unsuspected findings from CT urography performed for haematuria. Br J Radiol2012; 85: 1303–1306.
34.
SongJHBelandMDMayo-SmithWW. Incidental clinically important extraurinary findings at MDCT urography for haematuria evaluation: Prevalence in 1209 consecutive examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol2012; 199: 616–622.
35.
HertsBR. Role of three-dimensional imaging in surgical planning for kidney surgery. BJU Int2005; 95: 16–20.
36.
NawfelRDJudyPFSchleipmanAR. Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology2004; 232: 126–132.
37.
ChowLCKwanSWOlcottEW. Split-bolus MDCT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol2007; 189: 314–322.
38.
MaheshwariEO’MalleyMEStauntonM. Split-bolus MDCT urography: Upper tract opacification and performance for upper tract tumors in patients with hematuria. AJR Am J Roentgenol2010; 194: 453–458.
39.
KekelidzeMDwarkasingRSDijkshoomML. Triple-bolus multidetector CT urography as a one-stop shop – protocol design, opacification, and image quality analysis. Radiology2010; 225: 508–516.
LeyendeckerJRGianiniJW. Magnetic resonance urography. Abdom Imaging2009; 34: 527–540.
42.
YousemDMGatewoodOMGoldmanSM. Synchronous and metachronous transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract: Prevalence, incidence and radiographic detection. Radiology1988; 167: 613–618.
43.
BrowneRFMeehanCPColvilleJ. Transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: Spectrum of imaging findings. Radiographics2005; 25: 1609–1627.
DrudiFMDi LeoNMaghellaF. CEUS in the study of bladder, method, administration and evaluation, a technical note. J Ultrasound2014; 17: 57–63.
46.
WilsonSRGreenbaumLDGoldbergBB. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: What is the evidence and what are the obstacles?AJR Am J Roentgenol2009; 193: 55–60.
47.
CarusoGSalvaggioGCampisiA. Bladder tumor staging: Comparison of contrast-enhanced and gray-scale ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol2010; 194: 151–156.
48.
NicolauCBuneschLPeriL. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of bladder cancer. Br J Radiol2011; 84: 1091–1099.
49.
DrudiFMDi LeoNMalpassiniF. CEUS in the differentiation between low and high-grade bladder carcinoma. J Ultrasound2012; 15: 247–251.
50.
WangXHWangYJLeiCG. Evaluating the perfusion of occupying lesions of kidney and bladder with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Clin Imaging2011; 35: 447–451.
51.
BertolottoMCiceroCPerroneR. Renal masses with equivocal enhancement at CT: Characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol2015; 204: 557–565.
52.
MitterbergerMPinggeraGMNeuwirtH. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the urinary bladder: Preliminary experience of assessment in patients with haematuria. BJU Int2007; 99: 111–116.
53.
Silva-RamosMLouroNVersosR. Does 3D ultrasound enhance the diagnosis of bladder tumours in patients with haematuria?ISRN Urol2012; 2012: 158437.
54.
LiQYTangJHeEH. Clinical utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation between noninvasive and invasive neoplasms of urinary bladder. Eur J Radiol2012; 81: 2936–2942.
55.
WollinTLarocheBPsooyK. Canadian guidelines for the management of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults. Can Urol Assoc J2009; 3: 77–80.
56.
HughesKEDrakeTHammR. Investigation of two week wait referred haematuria patients in the UK: A national survey. J Clin Urol2015; 8: 306–314.