Discharge summaries for patients undergoing acute scrotal exploration: Are we providing accurate essential information?

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the accuracy of electronic discharge summaries (EDSs) written for patients who had undergone acute scrotal exploration for suspected testicular torsion.

Methods:

We reviewed the operation notes and EDSs for 169 admissions over a 52-month period where patients had undergone acute scrotal exploration for suspected acute testicular torsion and reviewed the correlation between what was written in these documents, focusing on laterality of pain, operative findings and procedure performed.

Results:

We found that the side of testicular pain was not mentioned in 14.8% of EDSs, the operative findings recorded on the EDS did not correlate to those on the operation notes in 17.2% of cases and the overall procedure performed did not correlate in 35.5% (with most of these relating to the laterality of the operation). The fact that an operative procedure happened at all was not mentioned in 4.7% (n = 8) of the EDSs.

Conclusions:

The information in such an important medical document needs to be accurate, and we advocate that the person performing the operation should initiate the discharge summary process, where EDS use is the norm for discharge. Junior doctors entering urology departments must also be trained on the key information to be included in urological EDSs.