Abstract
Penile cancer is a rare cancer in Western countries, but is more common in parts of the developing world. Usually, it is associated with older uncircumcised men who have a long-term phymotic preputium. Here, we report a case of penile cancer in a circumcised patient, occurring 3 months after a tick bite on the head of the penis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that suggests a possible association between Lyme disease and occurrence of “de novo” penile cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Introduction
Penile cancer is a rare but aggressive disease. It usually presents as a painless ulcer or lump on the head of the penis. Squamous cell carcinoma represents the most common histological subtype of penile cancer with pathogenesis intimately linked to chronic Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection. 1 Here we report a patient who has been bitten by a tick on the head of the penis that subsequently developed into a penile cancer 3 months after the bite. A possible association between Lyme’s disease and de novo penile cancer is discussed.
Case report
A 48-year-old circumcised patient, working as a sheep shearer, presented with ulcerous and inflammatory lesion of the penis with crusts spreading from the tip of the glans until the subcoroneal penile shaft. He reported that the disease has begun 3 months earlier when he found a tick under the glans that he took out by himself using a burning cigarette without any medical assistance. However, the lesion started to spread locally leading to inflammation and pain. He subsequently developed an expanding penile rush with crusts but did not report any systematic symptoms such as fever, malaise, and/or regional lymphadenopathy. The family medicine doctor ordered an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to measure IgM and IgG antibodies specific for Lyme disease and prescribed 14 days of doxycycline based on increased IgM values but negative IgG, suggesting a very recent infection. Thereafter, he referred the patient to an infectious disease specialist for evaluation.
When presented at our Clinic, 3 months after the bite, the head of the penis along with the distal part of the urethra was completely destroyed. No enlarged inguinal nodes were observed. A lesion biopsy was immediately scheduled that revealed well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma accompanied with an extensive inflammatory component. A partial penile amputation was performed with negative margins revealed from intraoperative frozen section (Figure 1(a) and (b)). However, during the operation, a large inflammatory component was observed manifesting as pus-like material leaking from the corporal bodies (Figure 1(c)). Haematoxylin and eosin staining confirmed squamous cell carcinoma that invades the spongious and corporal bodies (pT3, L0, V0, G1, R0) and a large infiltration of inflammatory cells consistent of neutrophils and eosinophils (Figure 2). However, the Warthin–Starry stain of the pathological sample that shows various microorganisms tested negative. The patient was treated with broad spectrum of antibiotics postoperatively. He was dismissed from the hospital the third postoperative day and was put on surveillance every 6 months since. Recent CT scan showed neither lymph node involvement nor local or distant metastasis. In terms of functional outcome 1 year after the operation, he has a normal voiding and even a sexual function.

Representative intraoperative images of the penile cancer. (a) Preoperative appearance. (b) Dissecting neurovascular bundle. (c) Dissecting ventral side of the penis and the urethra. Arrow points the white pus-like material leaking from the corporal bodies.

Haematoxylin and eosin staining confirming squamous cell carcinoma that invades the spongious and corporal bodies and a large infiltration of inflammatory cells consistent of neutrophils and eosinophils.
Discussion
Here we report an occurrence of penile cancer in a circumcised patient occurring 3 months after a tick bite on the head of the penis. Before the incident, he had a normal penis without lesions. To the best of our knowledge, this is a third report of a tick bite on the head of the penis2,3 and first report that suggests an association of tick bite (Lyme diseases) and penile cancer.
Lyme disease, also known as Lyme borreliosis, is an infectious disease caused by the Borrelia bacterium, which is spread by ticks. Tick-borne illnesses range from a mild fever that may be treated at home to a severe disease necessitating hospitalization. Occupationally acquired, tick bites are often seen in people working with animals that are prone to ticks. The patient has been sheep shearing for 4 months of the year for the past 20 years working all over the region. It is not the first time that he was bitten by a tick. However, following the tick bite on the head of the penis, symptoms begin to manifest as pruritus and burning at the site of the lesion, without systematic sighs such as fever, malaise, and/or regional lymphadenopathy.
Tick bites of the penis have rarely been reported. The first report dated from 1939 when first two cases were published. Shields et al. 4 have recently published two cases of possible tick bites in children manifesting as significant scrotal cellulitis in one and swelling and induration of the distal penis and glans, pruritus of the left groin and penis in the second. The authors suggest a high index of suspicion because a tick bite may present as penile edema. Nishi et al. 5 reported a case of a tick bite on the shaft of the penis that was surgically excised. Okahashi et al. 6 emphasizes the need for deep excision of tick bite lesions on the penis.
Penile cancer is a rare cancer in Western countries, but is more common in parts of the developing world. In these areas, penile cancer can account for up to 10% to 20% of all malignancies in men. 7 Among etiological factors, it seems that HPV infection plays a prominent role. In a recent review, 40% of all penile cancers were HPV related and type 16 HPV was the most common subtype often associated with aggressive variants of penile tumors with a poorer outcome in these patients. 8 In this patient, a local inflammatory reaction occurred after a tick bite and chronic inflammation is associated with increased risk of penile cancer. 9 Among proposed mechanisms, it seems that overexpression of NF-κB in cervical and penile cancers is a key modulator in driving chronic inflammation to cancer. Increased NF-κB activity is associated with many cancers, especially cancers associated with viral infections. 10
The increased risk in penile cancer prone areas may be due to differences in hygiene practices and increased numbers of uncircumcised males who are more likely to get and stay infected with HPV. In a systematic review, Larke et al. 11 reported a strong protective effect of childhood/adolescent circumcision on invasive penile cancer. The current patient had been circumcised as a child. Nevertheless, he develops squamous cell carcinoma of the glans suggesting a possible link between the tick bite with the occurrence of de novo penile cancer.
A recent study suggested a link between zoophilia and penile cancer in a cohort of nearly 500 men. 12 In this study, 44.9% of men with penile cancer reported sex with animals versus 31.6% of controls. Both univariate and multivariate analysis suggested zoophilia may be a risk factor for penile cancer. However, our patient had denied any link with this behavior.
Conclusion
This is first report that suggests a possible association between Lyme disease and occurrence of “de novo” penile cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethics approval
Our institution does not require ethical approval for reporting individual cases or case series.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) for their anonymized information to be published in this article.
