This essay provides a critical response to Joseph Blankholm’s new work The Secular Paradox. I praise the book for its ingenuity and then raise questions about how the experience of what he calls the “secular paradox” might vary by racial identity. I also explore the intolerance of western liberalism toward ghosts to explore how Blankholm’s account of the secular paradox might also offer insight into America’s unwillingness to grapple with its primitive past.
BlankholmJoseph. 2022. The Secular Paradox: On the Religiosity of the Non-Religious. New York: New York University Press.
2.
BlumenbergHans.1983. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Translated by Robert Wallace. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
3.
CavanaughWilliam T.2009. The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
EllisonRalph. 1994. Invisible Man. New York: The Modern Library Edition.
5.
OrsiRobert. 2018. History and Presence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
ShaganEthan. 2018. The Birth of Modern Belief: Faith and Judgment from the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7.
SheldonMyrna PerezKeelTerenceRagabAhmed. 2023. “Introduction.” In Critical Approaches to Science and Religion, edited by SheldonMyrna PerezRagabAhmedKeelTerence, 1–16. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
StormJason Ānanda Josephson. 2021. Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
9.
TaylorCharles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
WynterSylvia. 2003. “Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation—An Argument.” CR: The New Centennial Review3, no. 3: 257-337.
