FitzgeraldTimothy. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
GillespieMichael Allen. 2008. The Theological Origins of Modernity. London: University of Chicago Press.
6.
GoldenbergNaomi. 2019. “Timothy Fitzgerald and the Revival of Religious Studies.” Implicit Religion22, no. 3-4: 309-318.
7.
GoldenbergNaomi. 2023. “Why ‘Religion’ and ‘Secular’ Categories in Sociology: Decolonizing the Modern.” Critical Research on Religion11, no. 1: 109-112.
8.
HenleyAlex. 2023. “Why is it so Difficult to get Critical Religion into the Mainstream? Reflections on Horii’s ‘Religion’ and ‘Secular’ Categories in Sociology.” Critical Research on Religion11, no. 1: 116-119.
9.
IngoldTim. 2021. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.
10.
McCarraherEugene. 2019. The Enchantments of Mammon: How Capitalism Become the Religion of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
OwenSuzanne. 2023. “Etic/Emic Considerations in Mitsubishi Horii’s 'Religion’ and ‘Secular’ Categories in Sociology.” Critical Research on Religion11, no. 1: 113-115.
12.
Oxford Dictionary of English. 2022. “Etic.” Oxford Dictionary Version 15.2.245. MobiSystems, Inc.
13.
StormJason Ananda Josephson. 2021. Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. London: University of Chicago Press.
14.
WattsGalenMosurinjohnSharday. 2022. “Can Critical Religion Play by its Own Rules? Why There Be More Ways to Be ‘Critical’ in the Study of Religion”. The Journal of American Journal of Religion90, no. 2: 317-334.