After the demise of Christianity, Western society did not become secular, according to Emile Durkheim, but located foundations in a new religion he calls the “cult of the individual.” This religion holds the rational individual person as sacred, and corresponds to a multi-faceted, complex, and diverse society united around individual democratic rights and modern science. Different traditional religions can co-exist in the cult of the individual, but only if they accept a subordinate status in relation to it. Durkheim maintains, however, that all religions construct authoritative regimes of truth and moral obligations, setting the stage for conflict. How then should modern democracies respond to challenges to their authority from traditional religions? This article argues that a Durkheimian response would be to assert the values of the cult of the individual, as this is the only way to maintain the integrity and viability of Western democratic society.
AlbaneseC. 1976. Sons of the Fathers: The Civil Religion of the American Revolution.
Philadelphia:
Temple University Press.
2.
AlexanderJeffrey. 1988. “Culture and Political Crisis: ‘Watergate’ and Durkheimian Sociology.” In Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies, edited by Jeffrey Alexander, 187–224.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
3.
BellahRobert. 1967.
“Civil Religion in America.” Dædalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences96, no. 1: 1–21.
4.
BellahRobert. 1992. The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in a Time of Trial.
Chicago and London:
The University of Chicago Press.
5.
BrubakerRogers. 2015.
“Religious Dimensions of Political Conflict and Violence.” Sociological Theory33, no. 1: 1–19.
6.
CarlsPaul. 2018a. “Emile Durkheim.” In The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://www.iep.utm.edu/durkheim/ (accessed 5 December 2018).
7.
CarlsPaul. 2018b. “Free speech and the protection of human dignity in Canada, Germany, and the United States: The moral legitimation of competing discourses.” In: FellnerALehmkuhlU, andTutschekE (eds) Canada 150: Grappling with Diversity since Confederation.
Münster:
Waxmann. Forthcoming.
8.
CavanaughWilliam. 2009. The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
9.
ChrissJames J. 1993.
“Durkheim's Cult of the Individual as Civil Religion: Its Appropriation by Erving Goffman.” Sociological Spectrum13, no. 2: 251–275.
10.
CladisMark S. 1992. A Communitarian Defense of Liberalism: Durkheim and Contemporary Social Theory.
Stanford:
Stanford University Pres.
11.
CladisM. 2005. “Beyond Solidarity? Durkheim and Twenty-First Century Democracy in a Global Age.” In Cambridge Companion to Durkheim, edited by Jefrey Alexander and Philip Smith, 383–409,
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
12.
CladisMark S. 2010.
“Religion, Secularism, and Democratic Culture.” The Good Society19, no. 2: 22–29.
CollinsRandall. 1974. “
Three Faces of Cruelty: Towards a Comparative Sociology of Violence.” Theory and Society1, no. 4: 415–440.
15.
CollinsRandall. 1988. “The Durkheimian Tradition in Conflict Theory.” In Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies, edited by Jeffrey Alexander, 107–128.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
16.
CollinsRandall. 2001. “Social Movements and the Focus of Emotional Attention.” In Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements, edited by Jeff Goodwin, James M. Jasper, and Francesca Polletta, 27–44.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
17.
CollinsRandall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
18.
CollinsR. 2008. Violence: A Micro-Sociological Theory.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
19.
ConstantBenjamin. 1988. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns (1819).” In The Political Writings of Benjamin Constant, edited by Biancamaria Fontana, 307–328.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
20.
DattaRonjon Paul. 2008. “
Politics and Existence: Totems, Dispositifs, and Some Striking Parallels between Durkheim and Foucault.” Journal of Classical Sociology8, no. 22: 283–305.
21.
DurkheimEmile. 1951. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Translated by John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
22.
DurkheimEmile. 1953. Sociology and Philosophy. Translated by D. F. Pocock. London: Cohen and West.
23.
DurkheimEmile. 1958. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. Translated by Cornelia Brookfield. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
24.
DurkheimEmile. 1960. Montesquieu and Rousseau: Forerunners of Sociology. Translated by Ralph Manheim. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25.
DurkheimEmile. 1961. Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education. Translated by Everett K. Wilson and Herman Schnurer. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
26.
DurkheimEmile. 1973. “Individualism and the Intellectuals.” Translated by Mark Traugott. In Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society, edited by Robert Bellah, 43–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
DurkheimEmile. 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. Translated by W. D. Halls, Edited by Steven Lukes. New York: The Free Press.
28.
DurkheimEmile. 1983. Pragmatism and Sociology. Translated by J.C. Whitehouse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
DurkheimE. 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by W.D. Halls. New York: The Free Press.
30.
DurkheimEmile. 1991. De la Division du Travail Social, 2nd Edition.
Paris:
Presses Universitaires de France.
31.
DurkheimEmile. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen Fields. New York: Free Press.
32.
FassinDidier. 2015. “
In the Name of the Republic: Untimely Meditations on the Aftermath of the Charlie Hedbo Attack.” Anthropology Today31, no. 2: 3–7.
FournierM. 2013. Emile Durkheim: A Biography. Translated by David Macey Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
35.
GunningJeroenRichardJackson. 2011. “
What's so ‘Religious’ about ‘Religious Terrorism’?” Critical Studies on Terrorism4, no. 3: 369–388.
36.
HabermasJürgen. 2006. “
Religion in the Public Space.” European Journal of Philosophy14, no. 1: 1–25.
37.
HammondPhilip E. 1974. “Religious Pluralism and Durkheim’s Integration Thesis.” In Changing Perspectives in the Scientific Study of Religion, edited by Allan W. Eister, 115–142. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
38.
HuntLynn. 1988. “The Sacred and the French Revolution.” In Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies, edited by Jeffrey Alexander, 25–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Jønch-ClausenKarinKappelKlemens. 2016. “
Scientific Facts and Methods in Public Reason.” Res Publica22, no. 16: 117–133.
40.
JuergensmeyerMark. 2017a. Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence, 4th Edition.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
41.
JuergensmeyerMark. 2017b. “The Imagined War Between Secularism and Religion.” In The Oxford Handbook on Secularism, edited by Phil Zuckerman and John Shook, 71–84.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
42.
KertzerDavid I. 1988. Ritual, Power, and Politics.
New Haven:
Yale University Press
43.
KinnvallCaterina. 2004. “
Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security.” Political Psychology25, no. 5: 741–767.
44.
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. 2005. 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005).
45.
LukesSteven. 1973. Émile Durkheim: His Life and Works.
Middlesex:
Penguin Books.
46.
McCarthyThomas. 1994. “
Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue.” Ethics105, no. 1: 44–63.
47.
McKinnonAndrew. 2014. “
Elementary Forms of the Metaphorical Life: Tropes at Work in Durkheim’s Theory of the Religious.” Journal of Classical Sociology14, no. 2: 203–221.
48.
MüllerJan Werner. 2007. Constitutional Patriotism.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
49.
NumbersRonald L. 2006. The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design, Expanded Edition.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
50.
NumbersRonald L. 2010. “Scientific Creationism and Intelligent Design.” In The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion, edited by Peter Harrison, 127–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
OzoufMona. 1976. La Fête Revolutionnaire.
Paris:
Gallimard.
52.
PickeringWSF. 2007. “What Do Representations Represent?” In Durkheim and Representations, edited by WSF Pickering, 98–117.
London and New York:
Taylor and Francis.
53.
PickeringWSF. 2009. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories.
Cambridge, UK:
James Clarke & Co.
54.
PiphoChris. 1981. “
Scientific Creationism: A Case Study.” Education and Urban Society13, no. 2: 219–233.
RapoportDavid C. 1984. “
Fear and Trembling: Terrorism in Three Religious Traditions.” American Political Science Review78. no. 3: 658–677.
57.
RawlsJohn. 2005. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition.
New York:
Columbia University Press.
58.
ShillingChrisMellorPhilip A. 1998. “
Durkheim, Morality and Modernity: Collective Effervescence, Homo Duplex and the Sources of Moral Action.” The British Journal of Sociology49, no. 2: 193–209.
59.
SiedentopLarry. 2014. Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western Liberalism.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
60.
Stedman-JonesGareth. 2007. “Representations in Durkehim’s Masters: Kant and Renouvier I: Representation, Reality and the Question of Science.” In Durkheim and Representations, edited by WSF Pickering, 37–58.
London and New York:
Taylor and Francis.
61.
SternJessica. 2003. Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill.
New York:
Harper Collins.
62.
TaylorCharles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
63.
TaylorCharles. 2007. A Secular Age.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
64.
TiryakianEdward. 1988. “From Durkheim to Managua: Revolutions as religious revivals.” In Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies, edited by Jeffrey Alexander, 44–65.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
65.
TorzilliPaolo. 2000. “
Reconciling the Sanctity of Human Life, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution.” The Catholic Lawyer40, no. 2: 197–226.
66.
ToumeyChrisophter P. 1991. “
Modern Creationism and Scientific Authority.” Social Studies of Science21: 681–699.
67.
TrappMark. 2001. “
Created Equal: How the Declaration of Independence Recognizes and Guarantees the Right to Life for the Unborn.” Pepperdine Law Review28, no. 4: 819–847.
68.
WallworkErnest. 1984. “
Religion and Social Structure in The Division of Labor.” American Anthropologist86, no 1: 43–64.
69.
WarnerW. Lloyd. 1953. American Life: Dream and Reality.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
70.
Watts MillerW. 1996. Durkheim, Morals and Modernity.
Montreal & Kingston:
McGill-Queen’s University Press.
71.
WeithmanPaul J. 2002. Religion and the Obligations of Citizenship.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
72.
WellmanJamesTokunoKyoko. 2004. “
Is Religious Violence Inevitable?.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion43(3): 291–296.
73.
YsseldykRenateMathesonKimbrerlyAnismanHymie. 2010. “
Religiosity as Identity: Toward an Understanding of Religion from a Social Identity Perspective.” Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc14(1): 60–71.
