Thomas Lynch has proposed that scholars of religion can profitably follow Sally Haslanger’s lead and treat “religion,” as she treats race, as a social construction. He argues that this proposal resembles my treatment of “religion” in Philosophy and the Study of Religions, but it goes further by treating “religion” as what Haslanger calls a strongly pragmatic social construction, that is, a category that is solely the product of the use of the concept and which does not capture any feature in the world. In this response, I clarify that this argument can be made in a way that is stronger and closer to that of Haslanger if one adopts the position she calls “promiscuous realism.”
DayM (2012) Catching up with Marx: Truth, myth, and the niceties of ‘belief’. In: ArnalWBraunW andMcCutcheonR (eds) Failure and Nerve in the Academic Study of Religion.
Sheffield:
Equinox, pp.34–49.
2.
DupréJ (1993) The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
3.
HackingI (1999) The Social Construction of What?
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
4.
HaslangerS (2012) Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
5.
LynchT (2018)
Social construction and social critique: Haslanger, race, and the study of religion. Critical Research on Religion5(3). 284–301
6.
SalerB (1993) Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories.
New York:
Berghahn Books.
7.
SchilbrackK (2014) Philosophy and the Study of Religion: A Manifesto.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
8.
SchilbrackK (Forthcoming) Mathematics and the definitions of religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
