WidmannGBaleRJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(2):305-313.
2.
TahmasebAWismeijerDCouckeW, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):25-42.
3.
Raico GallardoYNda Silva-OlivioIRTMukaiE, et al. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(5):602-612.
4.
ErsoyAETurkyilmazIOzanO, et al. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol. 2008;79(8):1339-1345.
5.
TahmasebAWuVWismeijerD, et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(S16):416-435.
6.
YounesFCosynJDe BruyckereTCleymaetR, et al. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(6):721-732.
7.
Bover-RamosFViña-AlmuniaJCervera-BallesterJ, et al. Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):101-115.
8.
YimarjPSubbalekhaKDhanesuanK, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(6):672-678.
9.
KaewsiriDPanmekiateSSubbalekhaK, et al. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(6):505-514.
10.
ArikanHMuhtarogullariMUzelSM, et al. Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis when using an auxiliary geometry device. J Dent Sci. 2023;18(2):808-813.
11.
PozziACarosiPGallucciGO, et al. Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with intraoral optical scanning and stereophotogrammetry: An in vivo prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(10):1106-1117.
12.
JodaTBraggerU. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(12):e185-e189.
13.
PanYTsoiJKHLamWYH, et al. Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer-aided design in implant digital workflow: an in vitro study?Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(3):313-321.
14.
CapparePSanninoGMinoliM, et al. Conventional versus digital impressions for full arch screw-retained maxillary rehabilitations: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):829.
15.
GherloneEFFerriniFCrespiR, et al. Digital impressions for fabrication of definitive “all-on-four” restorations. Implant Dent. 2015;24(1):125-129.
16.
PanYTsoiJKHLamWYH, et al. The cumulative effect of error in the digital workflow for complete-arch implant-supported frameworks: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(9):886-899.
17.
SakaiTLiHShimadaT, et al. Development of artificial intelligence model for supporting implant drilling protocol decision making. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;67(3):360-365.
18.
Revilla-LeónMGómez-PoloMVyasS, et al. Artificial intelligence applications in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(2):293-300.
19.
WuYWangFFanS, et al. Robotics in dental implantology. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019;31(3):513-518.
20.
TalibHSWilkinsGNTurkyilmazI. Flapless dental implant placement using a recently developed haptic robotic system. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;60(9):1273-1275.
