To report the findings of a service evaluation of an NHS practice-based minor oral surgery service.
Method
A service evaluation including a retrospective analysis of activity and outcome data and assessment of patient and practitioner satisfaction.
Results
623 appointments were arranged, with a mean waiting time of 43 days. Treatment provided included: surgical removal of third molars and non-third molars, surgical endodontics and other surgical and oral medicine cases (29.7%, 44.1%, 3.0% and 23.4% of cases respectively). Antibiotics were prescribed at 16.1 % of treatment appointments and 1.9% required appointments for post-operative complications. All participants reported overall satisfaction with their care and strongly agreed/agreed with positive attitudinal statements about the oral surgeon's communication/information giving, technical competence and understanding and acceptance; 77.5% were seen on time and none were seen more than 15 minutes late; 87.5% felt the standard of the service was better than expected than at a hospital and none felt it was worse. Over 80 of practitioners agreed that waiting times were better than expected at a hospital, urgent problems were seen quickly and the referral process was easy and understandable. All practitioners strongly agreed/agreed they that they were happy with the service provided.
Conclusions
A range of minor oral surgery procedures can be provided with low complication rates, acceptable waiting times and accessibility, and high patient and referring practitioner satisfaction from a practice-based specialist oral surgery service.
NHS England.Guide for Commissioning Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine Specialties. London: NHS England; 2015.
5.
HalaiT, YatesJM.Assessment of oral surgery referrals from primary care to a regional dental hospital. Oral Surgery2014;7(3):168–76.
6.
CoulthardP, KoronR, KazakouI, MacfarlaneTV.Patterns and appropriateness of referral from general dental practice to specialist oral and maxillofacial surgical services. The British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery2000;38(4):320–5.
7.
CoulthardP, BaileyE, BridgmanCM.Introducing clinical triage for oral surgery referral management in England. Oral Surgery2014;7(3):143–51.
8.
BellG.An audit of 600 referrals to a primary care based oral surgery service. British Dental Journal.2007;203(3):146–7.
9.
DyerTA, DhamijaAC.Evaluation of an NHS practice-based minor oral surgery service. British Dental Journal.2009;207(12):577–82.
10.
DyerTA.A five-year evaluation of an NHS dental practice-based specialist minor oral surgery service. Community Dental Health2013;30(4):219–26.
11.
DaviesB, RamseyR, BryantD, MacKenzieN.A service review of a novel primary care specialist oral surgery referral service operating in a managed clinical network. Oral Surgery.2013;6(2):61–6.
12.
AskarW, CreanS.Are general dental practitioners confident in primary care oral surgery service?Oral Surgery. 2015;8(3):147–51.
13.
BharadwajGV, RiceMJ.Provision of specialist-led minor oral surgery service in Scottish NHS dental practices – analysis of benefits and costs. Oral Surgery2016;9(4):222–6.
14.
StufflebeamD.Evaluation Models. New Directions for Evaluation2001;2001(89):7–98.
15.
World Health Organization: UNFPA.Programme Manager's Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit. In: Division for oversight services, editor. World Health Organisation; 2004.
16.
Department of Health.Decontamination: Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices. London: HMSO; 2013.
17.
CorahNL, O'SheaRM, PaceLF, SeyrekSK.Development of a patient measure of satisfaction with the dentist: the Dental Visit Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Behavioral Medicine1984;7(4):367–73.
18.
EdwardsPJ, RobertsI, ClarkeMJ, DiguiseppiC, WentzR, KwanI, . Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online).2009(3):Mr000008.
19.
Health Research Authority.Is my study research? HRA decision tools. Health Research Authority; 2017. Available at: www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/.
20.
DevineM, GerrardG, RentonT.Current practice in mandibular third molar surgery. A national survey of British Association of Oral Surgeons membership. Oral Surgery.2017;10(1):11–9.
21.
Faculty of Dental Surgery.Guidelines for Surgical Endodontics. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England; 2012.
22.
General Dental Council.Standards for the Dental Team. London: General Dental Council; 2013.
23.
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (2015) SC 11 (2015) 1 AC 1430.
24.
Anon.Did not attend. Bandolier1999 (November):69–4.
25.
TrenouthMJ, HoughA.Reasons for broken and cancelled appointments in a British orthodontic clinic. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics1991;25(2):115–20.
26.
GeraghtyM, GlynnF, AminM, KinsellaJ.Patient mobile telephone 'text' reminder: a novel way to reduce non-attendance at the ENT out-patient clinic. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology2008;122(3):296–8.
27.
MilsomKM, JonesC, Kearney-MitchellP, TickleM.A comparative needs assessment of the dental health of adults attending dental access centres and general dental practices in Halton & St Helens and Warrington PCTs 2007. British Dental Journal2009;206(5):257–61.
28.
MarshmanZ, DyerTA, WybornCG, BealJ, GodsonJH.The oral health of adults in Yorkshire and Humber 2008. British Dental Journal2010;209(6).
29.
MarshmanZ, PorrittJ, DyerTA, WybornC, GodsonJ, BakerS.What influences the use of dental services by adults in the UK? Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology2012;40(4):306–14.
30.
NuttallN, FreemanR, Beavon-SeymourC, HillK.Access and barriers to care – report from the Adult Dental Helth Survey 2009. London: The Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2011.
31.
VenkateshwarGP, PadhyeMN, KhoslaAR, KakkarST.Complications of exodontia: a retrospective study. Indian Journal of Dental Research2011;22(5):633–8.
32.
HalabiD, EscobarJ, MunozC, UribeS.Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for the development of alveolar osteitis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.2012;70(5):1040–4.
33.
HalpernLR, DodsonTB. Does prophylactic administration of systemic antibiotics prevent postoperative inflammatory complications after third molar surgery?Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery2007;65(2):177–85.
34.
PogrelMA, LeeJS, MuffDF.Coronectomy: a technique to protect the inferior alveolar nerve. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery2004;62(12): 1447–52.
35.
RentonT, HankinsM, SproateC, McGurkM.A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars. British Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery2005;43(1):7–12.
36.
LongH, ZhouY, LiaoL, PyakurelU, WangY, LaiW.Coronectomy vs. total removal for third molar extraction: a systematic review. Journal of Dental Research. 2012;91(7):659–65.
37.
RentonT.Notes on coronectomy. British Dental Journal2012;212(7):323–6.
38.
MartinA, PerinettiP, ConstantinidesF, MaglioneM.Coronectomy as a surgical approach to impacted third molars: a systematic review. Head and Face Medicine2015;11(9):10.
39.
CalnanM.Towards a conceptual framework of lay evaluation of health care. Social Science Medicine1988;27(9):927–33.
40.
SitziaJ, WoodN.Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Social Science Medicine1997;45(12):1829–43.
41.
DyerTA, OwensJ, RobinsonPG.The acceptability of healthcare: from satisfaction to trust. Community Dental Health2016;33(4):242–51.
42.
SadlerA, DavidsonM, HoupisC, Watt-SmithS.Specialist practice for minor oral surgery: a comparative audit of third molar surgery. British Dental Journal1993;174(8):273–7.
43.
Medical Education England.Review of Oral Surgery Services and Training. London; 2010.
44.
Avon Primary Care Research Collaboration.Evaluation Works. A Toolkit to Support Commissioning of Health and Care Services. West of England Academic Health Science Network, BNSSG Research and Evidence Team and NIHR CLAHRC West2016. Available at: www.nhsevaluationtoolkit.net.
