Exploring the Impact of Maternal Modeling and Restrictive Mediation on Adolescents’ Short Video Use: Insights from Mother−Adolescent Dyads

Abstract

This study investigated the dual roles of mothers as models and regulators in influencing adolescents’ short video use (A-SVU). Using survey data from 7,509 Chinese mother−adolescent dyads, the study confirmed a positive modeling effect, demonstrating that maternal short video use significantly increased adolescent usage. Restrictive mediation, however, presented a more complex picture: general restrictive mediation showed an inverted U-shape relationship with A-SVU, while more specific restrictions were associated with reduced A-SVU. The style of restriction also mattered; applying restriction in an autonomy-supportive style decreased A-SVU, whereas controlling and inconsistent styles led to a counterproductive effect. Subsequent moderation analysis suggested that this boomerang effect was most pronounced when mothers used short videos infrequently but applied restrictions in a controlling manner. These findings were cross-validated by both adolescent-reported and mother-reported restrictive mediation, with adolescent-reported restrictive mediation serving as stronger predictors of A-SVU than mothers’ reports.

Keywords

Short video use modeling restrictive mediation mother−adolescent dyads polynomial regressions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adigwe

(2021). Identifying the moderating and mediating variables in parental mediation practices in Nigerian families in the digital age. Social Media and Society, 7(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211033817

Bandura

(1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Beyens

Keijsers

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2024). Development, validity, and reliability of the parent−adolescent communication about adolescents’ social media use scale (PACAS). Journal of Children and Media, 18(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2023.2299828

Beyens

Valkenburg

P. M.

Piotrowski

J. T.

(2019). Developmental trajectories of parental mediation across early and middle childhood. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy016

Bonanati

Buhl

H. M.

(2022). The digital home learning environment and its relation to children’s ICT self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09377-8

Brehm

S. S.

Brehm

J. W.

(2013). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.

Byrne

Lee

(2011). Toward predicting youth resistance to internet risk prevention strategies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.546255

Chemnad

Alshakhsi

Al-Harahsheh

Abdelmoneium

A. O.

Al-Khalaf

M. S.

Baghdady

Ali

(2023). Is it contagious? Does parents’ internet addiction impact their adolescents’ internet addiction? Social Science Computer Review, 41(5), 1691–1711. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221117408

Chen

(2024). Protecting teenagers’ gaming privacy: The roles of parental mediation, platform protection, and risky encounters. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(14), 3578–3591. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2285941

10.

Chen

Shi

(2019). Reducing harm from media: A meta-analysis of parental mediation. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018754908

11.

China Internet Network Information Center. (2023). National Survey Report on Internet Use of Minors in China (5th Edition). Retrieved December 12, 2025, from https://www.cnnic.cn/n4/2023/1225/c116-10908.html.

12.

Clark

L. S.

(2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x

13.

Collier

K. M.

Coyne

S. M.

Rasmussen

E. E.

Hawkins

A. J.

Padilla-Walker

L. M.

Erickson

S. E.

Memmott-Elison

M. K.

(2016). Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000108

14.

Dedkova

Mýlek

(2023). Parental mediation of online interactions and its relation to adolescents’ contacts with new people online: The role of risk perception. Information Communication and Society, 26(16), 3181–3198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2146985

15.

Edgerly

..(2026). Developing the habit: The socialization of US teens into distinct repertoires of news consumption. Journal of Children and Media, 20(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2025.2504879

16.

Edgerly

Thorson

Vraga

E. K.

Bode

(2017). Do parents still model news consumption? Socializing news use among adolescents in a multi-device world. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1263–1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816688451

17.

Fan

Wang

Qian

Geng

(2023). Parent–child discrepancies in perceived parental emotion socialization: Associations with children’s internalizing and externalizing problems in Chinese families. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(3), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01711-4

18.

Fardouly

Magson

N. R.

Rapee

R. M.

Oar

E. L.

Johnco

C. J.

Richardson

Freeman

(2024). Investigating longitudinal and bidirectional relationships between parental factors and time spent on social media during early adolescence. New Media and Society, 26(3), 1610–1626. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221076155

19.

Liu

R. D.

Ding

Hong

Jiang

(2020). The impact of parental active mediation on adolescent mobile phone dependency: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 107(19), 106280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106280

20.

Gruchel

Kurock

Bonanati

Buhl

H. M.

(2022). Parental involvement and children’s internet uses—relationship with parental role construction, self-efficacy, internet skills, and parental instruction. Computers & Education, 182, 104481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104481

21.

Gruchel

Kurock

Bonanati

Buhl

H. M.

(2025). Children's information-related internet use at home: The role of the quantity and quality of parental support and children’s motivation. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 39(3), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2024.2376099

22.

Hefner

Knop

Schmitt

Vorderer

(2019). Rules? Role model? Relationship? The impact of parents on their children’s problematic mobile phone involvement. Media Psychology, 22(1), 82–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1433544

23.

B. Y.

Johnson

G. K.

(2018). Screen time relationship of Chinese parents and their children. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.09.008

24.

Huang

Lai

Wang

Zhao

Dai

Wang

(2023). Does parental media mediation make a difference for adolescents? Evidence from an empirical cohort study of parent-adolescent dyads. Heliyon, 9(4), e14897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14897

25.

Kaye

D. B. V.

Chen

Zeng

(2020). The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952120

26.

Knief

Forstmeier

(2021). Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 2576–2590. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01587-5

27.

Lauricella

A. R.

Cingel

D. P.

(2020). Parental influence on youth media use. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(7), 1927–1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01724-2

28.

Lee

E. J.

Kim

H. S.

(2021). Effect of maternal factors on problematic smartphone use among elementary school children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179182

29.

Lee

S. J.

Chae

Y. G.

(2007). Children’s internet use in a family context: Influence on family relationships and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(5), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9975

30.

Wang

Zhu

Liu

Liao

Zhang

(2023). Parental neglect and short-form video application addiction in Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of alexithymia and the moderating role of refusal self-efficacy. Child Abuse & Neglect, 143, 106345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106345

31.

Liu

Q. X.

Fang

X. Y.

Deng

L. Y.

Zhang

J. T.

(2012). Parent−adolescent communication, parental internet use and internet-specific norms and pathological internet use among Chinese adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1269–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.010

32.

Livingstone

Helsper

E. J.

(2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

33.

Livingstone

Ólafsson

Helsper

E. J.

Lupiáñez-Villanueva

Veltri

G. A.

Folkvord

(2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277

34.

Lukavská

Hrabec

Lukavský

Demetrovics

Király

(2022). The associations of adolescent problematic internet use with parenting: A meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 135, 107423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107423

35.

Lwin

M. O.

Panchapakesan

Teresa

Cayabyab

Y. M.

Shin

(2021). Are parents doing it right? Parent and child perspectives on parental mediation in Singapore. Journal of Family Communication, 21(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2021.1979555

36.

Mancini

A. L.

Monfardini

Pasqua

(2017). Is a good example the best sermon? Children’s imitation of parental reading. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(3), 965–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-015-9287-8

37.

Modecki

K. L.

Goldberg

R. E.

Wisniewski

Orben

(2022). What is digital parenting? A systematic review of past measurement and blueprint for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(6), 1673–1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211072458

38.

Mullan

(2010). Families that read: A time-diary analysis of young people’s and parents’ reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(4), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01438.x

39.

Nathanson

A. I.

(2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology, 4(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_01

40.

Nathanson

A. I.

(2008). Parental mediation strategies. In Donsbach

(Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (Vol. 8, pp. 3506–3508). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecp007

41.

Navarro

J. L.

Fletcher

Jensen

(2023). A bifactor model of U.S. parents’ attitudes regarding mediation for the digital age. Journal of Children and Media, 17(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2022.2123012

42.

Notten

Kraaykamp

Konig

R. P.

(2012). Family media matters: Unraveling the intergenerational transmission of reading and television tastes. Sociological Perspectives, 55(4), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2012.55.4.683

43.

Qin

Musetti

Omar

(2023). Flow experience is a key factor in the likelihood of adolescents’ problematic TikTok use: The moderating role of active parental mediation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032089

44.

Ren

Zhu

Yang

(2022). The SES-based difference of adolescents’ digital skills and usages: An explanation from family cultural capital. Computers & Education, 177, 104382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104382

45.

Ren

Wei

Huang

Rong

(2026). Shield or Shackle? Exploring the Paradoxical Role of Restrictive Mediation in Adolescent Depression. Health Communication, 41(1), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2592117

46.

Ren, W., & Chen, Q. (2025). Prior Parental Mediation, Privacy Perceptions and Privacy Protection Behaviors Among Emerging Adults: Testing the Mediating Effect and its Gender Difference. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 69(4), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2025.2519734

47.

Ren, W., & Zhu, X. (2022). Parental mediation and Adolescents' Internet use: The moderating role of parenting style. Journal of Youth and adolescence, 51(8), 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01600-w

48.

Ren, W., Zhu, X., & Huang

(2026). Parental mediation patterns and children’s digital resilience in rural China: A latent profile analysis. International Journal of Social Welfare, 32(2), e70062. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.70062

49.

Rodríguez-de-Dios

van Oosten

J. M. F.

Igartua

J. J.

(2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012

50.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. In American Psychologist (Vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 68–78). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

51.

Ryan

R. M.

Vansteenkiste

(2023). Self-determination theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Self-Determination Theory (pp. 3–30). Oxford University Press.

52.

Sciacca

Laffan

D. A.

O’Higgins Norman

Milosevic

(2022). Parental mediation in pandemic: Predictors and relationship with children’s digital skills and time spent online in Ireland. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107081

53.

Senkbeil

(2023). How well does the digital home learning environment predict ICT literacy and ICT self-efficacy? Comparing the predictive power of adolescent and parent reports. Computers and Education, 207, 104937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104937

54.

Sijtsma

(2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0

55.

Smetana

J. G.

(1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131579

56.

Soenens

Vansteenkiste

Niemiec

C. P.

(2009). Should parental prohibition of adolescents’ peer relationships be prohibited? Personal Relationships, 16(4), 507–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01237.x

57.

Tan

C. Y.

Liang

(2025). Meta-analysis of associations between digital parenting and children's digital wellbeing. Educational Research Review, 48, 100699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100699

58.

Tavakol

Dennick

(2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

59.

Togar

E. M.

Antheunis

M. L.

Vanden Abeele

M. M. P.

De Leyn

(2025). Caught between autonomy and control: How Liberian teenagers perceive and navigate parental mediation of their mobile phone use. Journal of Children and Media, 19(2), 244–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2024.2418520

60.

Vaala

S. E.

Bleakley

(2015). Monitoring, mediating, and modeling: Parental influence on adolescent computer and internet use in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 9(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.997103

61.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Krcmar

Peeters

A. L.

Marseille

N. M.

(1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364474

62.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Piotrowski

J. T.

Hermanns

de Leeuw

(2013). Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39(4), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12010

63.

Vettehen

P. H.

Konig

R. P.

Westerik

Beentjes

(2012). Explaining television choices: The influence of parents and partners. Poetics, 40(6), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2012.09.002

64.

Wallace

L. N.

(2022). Associations between parental monitoring and parents’ social media use and social media perceptions. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 6(1), 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100294

65.

Wang

Lei

(2022). The relationship between parental phubbing and short-form videos addiction among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 32(4), 1580–1591. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12744

66.

Wang

Liu

R. D.

Ding

Hong

Liu

(2024). How parental mediation and parental phubbing affect preschool children’s screen media use: A response surface analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 27(9), 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0638

67.

Wang

Lwin

M. O.

Cayabyab

Y. M. T. M.

Hou

You

(2023). A meta-analysis of factors predicting parental mediation of children’s media use based on studies published between 1992–2019. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32(5), 1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02459-y

68.

Gao

Wei

Liu

Zhang

(2023). Adolescent user behaviors on short video application, cognitive functioning and academic performance. Computers and Education, 203(October 2022), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104865

69.

Yang

Huang

Zhang

Zhao

(2025). Association between parental phubbing and short-form video addiction: A moderated mediation analysis among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders, 369, 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.023

70.

Yang

Liu

R. D.

Ding

Lin

Ding

Yang

(2024). Time distortion for short-form video users. Computers in Human Behavior, 151(19), 108009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108009

71.

Zhang

Liu

(2019). Exploring short-form video application addiction: Socio-technical and attachment perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 42, 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101243

72.

Zhu

Jiang

Lei

Wang

Zhang

(2024). The relationship between short-form video use and depression among Chinese adolescents: Examining the mediating roles of need gratification and short-form video addiction. Heliyon, 10(9), e30349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30346

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.05 MB

0.00 MB