Mobile media decision-making is a mid-range, integrative theory that addresses the transformative role of mobile media in contemporary decision-making processes. Accordingly, mobile media augment human cognitive processes by being accessible to users as they move through and act in the world. Moreover, this theory accounts for the emergence of mobile autonomous systems that can move through and act in the world, in the absence of human cognition. As an analytical tool, this theory can be applied to understand specificities of how humans and nonhumans act, move, know, and produce agential change in the world. It can inform scholarship that explores social and material impacts, moral–ethical dimensions, and the design of mobile systems that augment and supplant human decision-making processes.
Alvarez LeónL. F. (2019). How cars became mobile spatial media: A geographical political economy of on-board navigation. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(3), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919826356
BarF.WeberM. S.PisaniF. (2016). Mobile technology appropriation in a distant mirror: Baroquization, creolization, and cannibalism. New Media & Society, 18(4), 617 –636.
5.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
6.
BeerD. (2022). The Tensions of Algorithmic Thinking. Bristol University Press.
BroussardM. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press.
11.
BurrellJ.KahnZ.JonasA.GriffinD. (2019). When users control the algorithms: Values expressed in practices on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359240
de Souza e SilvaA. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022
15.
DietvorstB. J.SimmonsJ. P.MasseyC. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033
16.
DourishP. (2016). Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716665128.
17.
EdwardP. (2003). Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In MisaT.BreyP.FeenbergA. (Eds.), Modernity and technology (pp. 185–226). MIT Press.
18.
EglistonB.CarterM. (2022). ‘The interface of the future’: Mixed reality, intimate data and imagined temporalities. Big Data & Society, 9(1), 20539517211063689.
19.
EngelbartD. (1962). Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Stanford Research Institute.
20.
EubanksV. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. Macmillan+ ORM.
21.
FarmanJ. (2012). Mobile interface theory: Embodied space and locative media. Routledge.
22.
FeliciniN.MortaraL. (2023). Augmented cognition compass: A taxonomy of cognitive augmentations. In D. D. Schmorrow & C. M. Fidopiastis (Eds.), Augmented Cognition. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 14019, pp. 189–205). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35017-7_13
23.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books.
GillespieT. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In GillespieT.BockzowskiP.FootK. (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (Vol. 167, pp. 167 –194). MIT Press.
27.
GitelmanL. (2006). Always already new: Media, history and the data of culture. MIT Press.
HansenM. B. (2015). Feed-forward: On the future of twenty-first-century media. University of Chicago Press.
30.
HarawayD. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
31.
HarawayD. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of nature. Routledge.
32.
HindS. (2019). Digital navigation and the driving-machine: Supervision, calculation, optimization, and recognition. Mobilities, 14(4), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1569581
33.
HindS. (2024). Driving decisions: How autonomous vehicles make sense of the world. Palgrave Macmillion.
34.
HjorthL.RichardsonI. (2017). Pokémon GO: Mobile media play, place-making, and the digital wayfarer. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916680015
35.
HorowitzM. C. (2021). When speed kills: Lethal autonomous weapon systems, deterrence and stability. In SechserT.NarangN.TalmageC. (Eds.), Emerging Technologies and International Stability (pp. 144–168). Routledge.
36.
HughesT. P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems. In BijkerW.HughesT.PinchT. (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 51–82). MIT Press.
KitchinR. (2019). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. In BeerD. (Ed.), The social power of algorithms (pp. 14–29). Routledge.
40.
KitchinR.DodgeM. (2014). Code/space: Software and everyday life. MIT Press.
41.
LeeS. C.JeonM.StojmenovaK.FakhrhosseiniM.JiY. G. (2023). HCI for future mobility. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(16), 3159 –3161.
LoggJ. M.MinsonJ. A.MooreD. A. (2019). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005
MakhataevaZ.AkhmetovT.VarolH. A. (2023). Augmented reality for cognitive impairments. In NeeA. Y. C.OngS. K. (Eds.), Springer handbook of augmented reality. (pp. 765–773). Springer.
46.
MartinB.TarrafD. C.WhitmoreT. C.DeWeeseJ.KenneyC.SchmidJ.DeLucaP. (2019). Advancing autonomous systems: An analysis of current and future technology for unmanned maritime vehicles. Rand Corporation.
47.
MertonR. (1949). Social theory and social structure. Simon & Schuster: The Free Press.
48.
MunnL. (2022). Automation is a myth. Stanford University Press.
49.
NagyP.NeffG. (2024). Conjuring algorithms: Understanding the tech industry as stage magicians. New Media & Society, 26(9), 4938–4954. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241251789
50.
NobleS. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University press.
51.
PasqualeF. (2015). The Black Box Society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
52.
PennyS. (2015). The elephants in the (server) room: Sustainability and surveillance in the era of big data. In EkmanU.BolterJ. D.DiazL.SondergaardM.EngbergM. (Eds.), Ubiquitous computing, complexity, and culture (1st ed.) (pp. 110–124). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315781129-12
53.
PinkS.ForsV.GlössM. (2018). The contingent futures of the mobile present: Automation as possibility. Mobilities, 13(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2018.1436672
54.
RaleyC.StriplingR.KruseA.SchmorrowD.PatreyJ. (2004, September). Augmented cognition overview: Improving information intake under stress. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting(Vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 1150–1154). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
55.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Simon & Schuster.
56.
ScharreP. D. (2015). The opportunity and challenge of autonomous systems. Autonomous Systems: Issues for Defence Policymakers, 3–26. https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/capdev_02.pdf#page=25
SeaverN. (2019). Knowing algorithms. In: VertesiJ.RibesD. (Eds.), Digital STS (pp. 412 –422). Princeton University Press.
59.
ShellerM. (2018). Mobility justice: The politics of movement in an age of extremes. Verso Books.
60.
SimonH. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
61.
SismondoS. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies. John Wiley & Sons.
62.
SlackJ. D.WiseJ. M. (2015). Culture+ technology: A primer (2nd ed.). Peter Lang.
63.
StanneyK.HaleK.SchmorrowD. (2009). Foundational concepts of augmented cognition and applications. Springer.
64.
StanneyK.WinslowB.HaleK.SchmorrowD. (2015). Augmented cognition. In Boehm-DavisD. A.DursoF. T.LeeJ. D. (Eds.), APA handbook of human systems integration (pp. 329–343). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14528-021
StarS. L.RuhlederK. (1994). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work(pp. 253–264).
67.
StephensK. K.RobertsonB. W.MurthyD. (2019). Throw me a lifeline: Articulating mobile social network dispersion and the social construction of risk in rescue communication. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919846522
68.
St. JohnM.KobusD. A.MorrisonJ. G.SchmorrowD. (2004). Overview of the DARPA augmented cognition technical integration experiment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1702_2
69.
TaylorL. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
VagiaM.TransethA. A.FjerdingenS. A. (2016). A literature review on the levels of automation during the years. What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed?. Applied Ergonomics, 53(1), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.013
74.
Vallès-PerisN.ParetoJ. (2025). Artificial intelligence as a mode of ordering. Automated-decision making in primary care. Information,Communication & Society, 28(11), 2015–2033.
75.
von NeumannJ.MorgensternO. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.
76.
WienerN. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. The MIT Press.
77.
WinnerL. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in the age of high technology. University of Chicago Press.
78.
ZookM. A.GrahamM. (2007). Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(3), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3311
