In this paper, I propose to explore the relationship between women and the mobile phone through the lens of political economy critique and the Marxian theory of value, as revisited by feminist scholars. In the first part, I offer metatheoretical reflections on strategies to revitalize the theoretical framework of mobile communication studies. I analyze the limitations of how mobile (and digital) studies have, so far, framed the issue of gender. I propose an initial paradigm shift in these studies by broadening the scope of gender and mobile communication research beyond the confines of traditional studies on gender differences, moving toward an exploration of the relationship between women and capital in mobile communication. I continue by proposing a second shift in mobile phone studies, illustrating how mobile communication is increasingly becoming human–machine communication and how the use of mobile phones is actually structured as reproductive labor. I then introduce the theory of value, a well-established sociological theory first proposed by Marx and later reelaborated by feminist scholars. I apply this theory to mobile communication, by expanding it further. Following this, I present a third paradigm shift, advocating a transition from studying the social consequences of mobile communication to investigating the deeper socioeconomic forces driving the adoption of mobile phones and digital technologies for women. The feminist reworking of the theory of value supports these paradigm shifts, enabling us to explore mobile communication within the domestic sphere in a novel way, particularly as it relates to housework and digital labor.
BaronN. S.Hård af SegerstadY. (2010). Cross-cultural patterns in mobile-phone use: Public space and reachability in Sweden, the USA, and Japan. New Media & Society, 12(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809355111
4.
BucholtzM. (2003). Theories of discourse as theories of gender: Discourse analysis in language and gender studies. In HolmesJ.MeyerhoffM. (Eds.), Handbook of language and gender (pp. 43–68). Blackwell.
5.
CampbellS. (2020). Cutting the cord: Social and scholarly revolutions as CMC goes mobile. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz021
6.
ChenZ.LuX.AiW.LiH.MeiQ.LiuX. (2018). Through a gender lens: Learning usage patterns of emojis from large-scale android users. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference (pp. 763–772).
7.
ChiaroM.FortunatiL. (1999). Nouvelles technologies et compétences des usagers. Réseaux, 17(96), 147–182.
8.
Claisse, G. (1998). La Galassia Multimediale. Logiche e prospettive di equipaggiamento delle famiglie. In: L. Fortunati (Ed.), Telecomunicando in Europa (pp. 55–124). Franco Angeli.
9.
Dalla CostaM. R.JamesS. (1972). The power of women and the subversion of the community: Women and the subversion of the community. The Falling Wall Press.
FedericiS. (2002). Women, reproduction and globalization. In ReysooF. (Ed.), Économie mondialisée et identités de genre (pp. 57–74). Graduate Institute Publications: Genève.
12.
FedericiS. (2020). Genere e capitale. Per una rilettura femminista di Marx. Derive/Approdi.
13.
FortunatiL. (1981). L'arcano della riproduzione. Casalinghe, prostitute, operai e capitale. Marsilio.
14.
FortunatiL. (1995). Gli italiani al telefono. Angeli.
15.
FortunatiL. (2002). The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication & Society, 5(4), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180208538803
16.
FortunatiL. (2006). User design and the democratization of the mobile phone. First Monday, special issue 7 ‘Command Lines: The Emergence of Governance in Global Cyberspace’. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.1615
17.
FortunatiL. (2007). Immaterial labor and its machinization. Ephemera Theory & Politics in Organization, 7(1), 139–157.
18.
FortunatiL. (2009). Theories without heart. In EspositoA.VichR. (Eds.), Cross–Modal analysis of speech, gestures, gaze and facial expressions (pp. 5–17). Springer.
19.
FortunatiL. (2011). ICTs and immaterial labor from a feminist perspective. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 35(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859911417713
20.
FortunatiL. (2023a). The smartphone between the present and the future: Five changes. Mobile Media & Communication, 11(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221131223
21.
FortunatiL. (2023b). Gender and identity: Some notes. In McEwenR.GuzmanA.JonesS. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of human-machine communication (pp. 127–135). Sage.
22.
FortunatiL. (2023c). Law and the reproduction sphere as the place of a double production of value. feminists@law, 12(2), 1–12.
23.
FortunatiL. (2025). The Arcana of reproduction. Houseworkers, prostitutes, workers and capital (2nd revised and corrected edition). Verso.
24.
FortunatiL.AustinA. (2025). Digital labor and the domestic sphere. In QiuJ. L.YeoS.MaxwellR. (Eds.), The handbook of digital labor (pp. 372–391). IAMCR and Wiley Blackwell.
25.
FortunatiL.EdwardsA. P. (2022). Gender and human-machine communication: Where are we?Human-Machine Communication, 5, 7–47. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.5.1
26.
FortunatiL.ManganelliA. M. (1998). La comunicazione tecnologica: comportamenti, opinioni ed emozioni degli europei. In FortunatiL. (Ed.), Telecomunicando in Europa (pp. 125–184). Franco Angeli.
FortunatiL.TaipaleS. (2014). The advanced use of mobile phones in five European countries. British Journal of Sociology, 65(2), 199–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12075
29.
FortunatiL.VincentJ. (2009). Introduction. In VincentJ.FortunatiL. (Eds.), Electronic emotion. The mediation of emotion via information and communication technologies (pp. 1–31). Peter Lang.
30.
FraserN. (2016). Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review, 100, 99–117.
31.
FuchsC.SevignaniS. (2013). What is digital labour? What is digital work? What’s their difference? And why do these questions matter for understanding social media?Triple-C: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 11(2), 237–293. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.461
32.
GergenK. J. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In KatzJ.AakhusM. (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227–241). Cambridge University Press.
33.
GuzmanA. L. (2018). What is human-machine communication, anyway? In GuzmanA. L. (Ed.), Human-Machine communication: Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves (pp. 1–28). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b14399
34.
Herring, S. (2003). Gender and power in on-line communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202–228). Blackwell.
35.
HjorthL. (2006). Postal presence: A case study of mobile customisation and gender in Melbourne. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 19, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-006-1022-6
JarrettK. (2016). Feminism, labour and digital media: The digital housewife. Routledge.
38.
JonesS. (2014). People, things, memory and human-machine communication. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 10(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.10.3.245_1
39.
KimY.KimB.KimY.WangY. (2017). Mobile communication research in communication journals from 1999 to 2014. New Media & Society, 19(10), 1668–1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817718162
40.
KochT. K.RomeroP.StachlC. (2022). Age and gender in language, emoji, and emoticon usage in instant messages. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106990
41.
LasénA. (2004). Affective technologies – emotions and mobile phones. Receiver, 11. The Digital World Research Centre. http://www.surrey.ac.uk/dwrc
LingR.BaronN. S. (2007). Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American College Data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06303480
44.
LingR.YttriB. (2002). Nobody sits at home and waits for the telephone to ring: Micro and hyper-coordination through the use of the mobile telephone. In KatzJ.AakhusM. (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139–169). Cambridge University Press.
45.
LingelJ.CrawfordK. (2020). “Alexa, tell me about your mother”: The history of the secretary and the end of secrecy. Catalist: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 6(1), 2380–3312.
46.
LivholtsM.BryantL. (2013). Gender and the telephone: Voice and emotions shaping and gendering space. Human Technology, 9(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201312042738
47.
MartinJ. A. (2014). Mobile media and political participation: Defining and developing an emerging field. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914520847
48.
MarxK. (1976). Capital. Vol I. Penguin Books.
49.
McEwenR.GuzmanA.JonesS. (Eds.). (2023). The SAGE handbook of human-machine communication. Sage.
50.
PeiX.ChibA. (2020). Defining mGender. The role of the mobile phone use in gender construction processes. In LingR.FortunatiL.GogginG.SunL.YulingL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mobile communication, culture, and information (pp. 517–528). Oxford University Press.
51.
PeiX.MalhotraP.LingR. (Eds.). (2024). Under the radar: Marginalized women’s use of mobile communication. Routledge.
SkogB. (2002). Mobiles and the Norwegian teen: Identity, gender and class. In KatzJ. E.AakhusM. (Eds.), Perpetual contact. Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 255–273). Cambridge University Press.
54.
ThorneB.StaceyJ. (1993). The missing feminist revolution in sociology. In KauffmanL. (Ed.), American feminist thought at century's end (pp. 167–188). Blackwell.
55.
WeiR.FanJ.Leo-LiuJ. (2023). Mobile communication research in 15 top-tier journals, 2006–2020: An updated review of trends, advances, and characteristics. Mobile Media & Communication, 11(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221110324
56.
WeiR.LoV.-H. (2006). Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society, 8(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806059870
57.
World Internet Project (2010).
58.
YaoM. Z.LingR. (Eds.). (2020). “What is computer-mediated communication?”—an Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz027
