Sharing is caring: The positive role of smartphone co-use in social dynamics

Abstract

Smartphones are increasingly present during the exchanges we have with others in real life. Such co-present smartphone use has mainly been examined from a negative perspective, and research has insufficiently recognized the positive role these behaviors may play in social relationships. The main goal of the current study was therefore to offer insight into the processes by which smartphone co-use may be related to positive social dynamics during in-person interactions. Data were collected through two cross-sectional studies among 1) in Austria (N = 257, M_age= 32.84, SD_age= 13.97, 55.9% female) and 2) in Belgium (N = 180, M_age= 10.79, SD_age= 0.66, 54% female) in 2022. Results from Study 1 indicated a significant indirect relationship between co-use and friendship satisfaction mediated through emotional support and companionship. Only for male participants, the relationship between smartphone co-use and perceived companionship was evident. Study 2 further indicated that this relationship was mediated through increased companionship and perceived emotional support for male participants, but not for female participants. As such, the current study offers an important first step in exploring the positive role co-present smartphone use can play in social relationships among different generations.

Keywords

Survey mobile communication smartphone co-use cross-sectional friendship satisfaction sharing screens

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arpaci

Kocadag Unver

(2020). Moderating role of gender in the relationship between big five personality traits and smartphone addiction. Psychiatric Quarterly, 91(2), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09718-5

Buhrmester

Furman

(2008). The Network of Relationships Inventory: Relationship qualities version. University of Texas at Dallas. https://www.midss.org/content/network-relationships-inventory-relationship-qualities-version-nri-rqv%E2%80%94

Buhrmester

Furman

Wittenberg

M. T.

Reis

H. T.

(1988). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.991

Bukowski

W. M.

Hoza

Boivin

(1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407594113011

Caldwell

M. A.

Peplau

L. A.

(1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 8(7), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287568

Chan

(2018). Mobile-mediated multimodal communications, relationship quality and subjective well-being: An analysis of smartphone use from a life course perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.027

Chen

Zhang

K. Z.

Gong

Zhao

S. J.

Lee

M. K.

Liang

(2017). Examining the effects of motives and gender differences on smartphone addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 891–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.002

Chotpitayasunondh

Douglas

K. M.

(2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18.

Feeney

B. C.

Lemay

E. P.

Jr. (2012). Surviving relationship threats: The role of emotional capital. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212442971

10.

Fichten

C. S.

Tagalakis

Judd

Wright

Amsel

(1992). Verbal and nonverbal communication cues in daily conversations and dating. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(6), 751–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1992.9712105

11.

Fischer-Grote

Kothgassner

O. D.

Felnhofer

(2019). Risk factors for problematic smartphone use in children and adolescents: A review of existing literature. Neuropsychiatrie, 33(4), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40211-019-00319-8

12.

Floegel

Elias

Lemish

(2021). Young children’s Mobile device use in public places: Immersion, distraction, and co-use. Studies in Media and Communication, 9(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v9i1.5236

13.

Furman

Buhrmester

(1985). Children’s perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21(6), 1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.6.1016

14.

Gable

S. L.

Reis

H. T.

Impett

E. A.

Asher

E. R.

(2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228

15.

Gatica-Perez

(2009). Automatic nonverbal analysis of social interaction in small groups: A review. Image and Vision Computing, 27(12), 1775–1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2009.01.004

16.

Hales

A. H.

Dvir

Wesselmann

E. D.

Kruger

D. J.

Finkenauer

(2018). Cell phone-induced ostracism threatens fundamental needs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(4), 460–473.

17.

Harter

(1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. The Guilford Press.

18.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.

19.

Freeman

L. A.

(2010). Are men more technology-oriented than women? The role of gender on the development of general computer self-efficacy of college students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 203–212. Retrieved from http://jise.org/volume21/n2/jisev21n2p203.pdf

20.

Humphreys

Hardeman

(2021). Mobiles in public: Social interaction in a smartphone era. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920927062

21.

Humphreys

Karnowski

Von Pape

(2018). Smartphones as metamedia: A framework for identifying the niches structuring smartphone use. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2793–2809. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7922

22.

Kelly

Miller-Ott

A. E.

Duran

R. L.

(2017). Sports scores and intimate moments: An expectancy violations theory approach to partner cell phone behaviors in adult romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 81(5), 619–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1299206

23.

Kildare

C. A.

Middlemiss

(2017). Impact of parents’ mobile device use on parent–child interaction: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.003

24.

Kim

Y. H.

Kim

D. J.

Wachter

(2013). A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decision Support Systems, 56, 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.07.002

25.

Laursen

Hartup

W. W.

(2002). The origins of reciprocity and social exchange in friendships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 95, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.35

26.

Leary

M. R.

Baumeister

R. F.

(1995). The need to belong. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

27.

Mannell

R. C.

(2007). Leisure, health and well-being. World Leisure Journal, 49(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/04419057.2007.9674499

28.

Mast

M. S.

(2007). On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician–patient interaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 67(3), 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.005

29.

McDaniel

B. T.

(2019). Parent distraction with phones, reasons for use, and impacts on parenting and child outcomes: A review of the emerging research. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.139

30.

McDaniel

B. T.

Coyne

S. M.

(2016). Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065

31.

McDaniel

B. T.

Galovan

A. M.

Drouin

(2021). Daily technoference, technology use during couple leisure time, and relationship quality. Media Psychology, 24(5), 637–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1783561

32.

McDaniel

B. T.

Radesky

J. S.

(2018). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822|

33.

Meeus

Coenen

Eggermont

Beullens

(2021). Family technoference: Exploring parent mobile device distraction from children’s perspectives. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(3), 584–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157921991602

34.

Mehrabian

(1972). Nonverbal communication. Routledge.

35.

Nuñez

T. R.

Radtke

Eimler

S. C.

(2020). A third-person perspective on phubbing: Observing smartphone-induced social exclusion generates negative affect, stress, and derogatory attitudes. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-3-3

36.

Ong

C. S.

Lai

J. Y.

(2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006

37.

Prensky

(2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

38.

Radesky

J. S.

Kistin

C. J.

Zuckerman

Nitzberg

Gross

Kaplan-Sanoff

Augustyn

Silverstein

(2014). Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics, 133(4), e843–e849. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3703

39.

Roberts

J. A.

David

M. E.

(2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058

40.

Rose

A. J.

Rudolph

K. D.

(2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98

41.

Scifo

(2005). Domestication of camera phone and MMS communication: The early experiences of young Italians. In Nyiri

(Ed.), A Sense of Place: The Global and the Local in Mobile Communication (pp. 363–373). Passagen Verlag.

42.

Smahel

Machackova

Mascheroni

Dedkova

Staksrud

Ólafsson

Livingstone

Hasebrink

(2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo

43.

Steenson

M. W.

Donner

(2008). Beyond the personal and private: Modes of mobile phone sharing in urban India. In The Reconstruction of Space and Time (pp. 231–250). Routledge.

44.

Stevic

Matthes

(2023). Co-present smartphone use, friendship satisfaction, and social isolation: The role of coping strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, 107960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107960

45.

Taywade

Khubalkar

(2019). Gender differences in smartphone usage patterns of adolescents. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 7(4), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.25215/0704.060

46.

Vanden Abeele

Hendrickson

A. T.

Pollmann

M. M.

Ling

(2019). Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: An exploratory observation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.004

47.

Vanden Abeele

Schouten

A. P.

Antheunis

M. L.

(2017). Personal, editable, and always accessible: An affordance approach to the relationship between adolescents’ mobile messaging behavior and their friendship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516660636

48.

Villegas

(2013). The influence of technology on family dynamics. Proceedings of the New York State Communication Association, 2012, Article 10. Available at: https://docs.rwu.edu/nyscaproceedings/vol2012/iss1/10

49.

Walsh

C. M.

Neff

L. A.

Gleason

M. E.

(2017). The role of emotional capital during the early years of marriage: Why everyday moments matter. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(4), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000277

50.

Weilenmann

Larsson

(2001). Local use and sharing of mobile phones. In Brown

Green

Harper

(Eds.), Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age (pp. 99–115). Springer Verlag.

51.

Winstead

B. A.

(1986). Sex differences in same-sex friendships. In Derlega

V. J.

Winstead

B. A.

(Eds.), Friendship and Social Interaction, Springer Series in Social Psychology (pp. 81–99). Springer. https://doi-org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_5