AricatR. G.LingR. (2020). Valuable information and cashable scrap: Mobile phone adoption and non-adoption among scrap dealers and rag pickers in Myanmar.The Information Society, 34(5), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2020.1805248
2.
BakalisS.AbelnM.Mante-MeijerE. (1997). Adoption of mobile telephony in Europe. In L.Haddon (Ed.), Communications on the move: The experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s (pp. 19–28) Telia COST 248.
3.
BentoN. (2012). Historical diffusion of mobile phones and its impact on energy demand: Findings and outlook. In Interim report IR-12-007. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/10267/
4.
BergA. J. (1996). “A mobile phone is a mobile phone, is a mobile phone, is a mobile phone?” In COST 248 Meeting, Brussels, Belgium.
5.
BoaseJ.HumphreysL. (2018). Mobile methods: Explorations, innovations, and reflections. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918764215
6.
CampbellS.De Souza e SilvaA.FortunatiL.GogginG. (Eds.) (2023). Futures in mobile communication research [Special issue]. New Media and Society, 25(4) 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231158645.
7.
CampbellS.RussoT. C. (2003). The social construction of mobile telephony: An application of the social influence model to perceptions and uses of mobile phones within personal communication networks. Communication Monographs, 70(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000179124
8.
CampbellS. W. (2007). A cross-cultural comparison of perceptions and uses of mobile telephony.New Media & Society, 9(2), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807075016
9.
CampbellS. W.KwakN. (2011). Political involvement in “mobilized” society: The interactive relationships among mobile communication, network characteristics, and political participation.Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1005–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01601.x
10.
CastellsM.Fernandez-ArdevolM.QiuJ.SeyA. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. MIT Press.
11.
ChibA.LwinM. O.AngJ.LinH.SantosoF. (2008). Mobiles and midwives: Improving healthcare communications via mobile phones in Aceh Besar, Indonesia.Asian Journal of Communication, 18(4), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980802344182
12.
CohenA. A.LemishD. (2005). When bombs go off the mobiles ring: The aftermath of terrorist attacks. In K.Nyiri (Ed.), A sense of place: The global and the local in mobile communication (pp. 117–128). Passagen Verlag.
13.
de GournayC. (1997). The structure of communication usage of traveling managers. In L.Haddon (Ed.), Communications on the move: The experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s (pp. 51–72). Telia COST 248.
14.
de GournayC. (2002). Pretense of intimacy in France. In J. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 193–205). University of Cambridge Press.
15.
de Sola PoolI. (1971). The social impact of the telephone. MIT press.
16.
de Sola PoolI. (1983). Technologies of freedom. Harvard University Press.
17.
De Souza e SilvaA. (2003). From simulations to hybrid space: How nomadic technologies change the real.Technoetic Arts, 1(3), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1386/tear.1.3.209/1
18.
De Souza e SilvaA.ShellerM. (Eds.) (2014). Mobility and locative media: Mobile communication in hybrid space. Routledge.
19.
DonnerJ. (2005). The mobile behaviours of Kigali’s microentrepreneurs: Whom they call … and why. In K.Nyiri (Ed.), The global and local in mobile communication (pp. 293–304). Passagen Verlag.
20.
FortunatiL. (1995). Gli Italiani al Telefono: Collana Di Sosiologia. (Italians on the Telephone: Sociology Series). Vol. 1. Franco Angeli. https://air.uniud.it/handle/11390/679401
21.
FortunatiL. (1997). The ambiguous image of the mobile phone. In L. Haddon (Ed.), Communications on the move: The experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s. Telia COST248.
FortunatiL.KatzJ. E.RicciniR. (Eds.). (2002). Mediating the human body: Technology, communication and fashion (Corpo Futuro. Il Corpo Umano Tra Tecnologie, Comunicazione e Moda). Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
GergenK. J. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In J.KatzM.Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227–241). Cambridge University Press.
25.
GogginG. (2005, July 4–7). Mobile phone culture and the love of text messaging. In Annual Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Communication Association, Christchurch, New Zealand.
26.
GogginG. (Ed.) (2013). Mobile phone cultures. Routledge.
27.
HaddonL. (1997b). Empirical research on the domestic phone: A literature review. Culcom Working Paper No.2. University of Sussex.
28.
HaddonL. (1994). The phone in the home: Ambiguity, conflict and change. In A.Kant (Ed.), The European telecom user. Telia COST 248.
29.
HaddonL. (1997a). An agenda for research on mobile telephony. In L.Haddon (Ed.), Communications on the move: The experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s (pp. 146–152). Telia COST248.
30.
HaddonL. (Ed.) (1997d). Communications on the move: The experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s. COST248 Mobile Workgroup.
31.
HaddonL. (1996, April 11). Mobile telephony issues: Discussion paper for COST 248, Mobile sub-group. In COST 248 Meeting, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
32.
HaddonL.SilverstoneR. (1994). Lone parents and their information and communication technologies. In XX. Media, Technology and Culture Research Group, Graduate Research Centre in Culture, University of Sussex.
33.
HaddonL.SilverstoneR. (1996). Information and communication technologies and the young elderly. SPRU/CICT Report Series. University of Sussex.
34.
HaddonL. (Ed.) (1997c). Themes in mobile telephony: Final report of the COST 248 Home and Work group. Telia COST248.
35.
HarperR.PalenL.TaylorA. (2005). The inside text: Social perspectives on SMS in the mobile age. Klewer.
36.
HjorthL. (2003). Cute@ keitai.com. In N. Gottlieb & M. McLelland (Eds.), Japanese cybercultures (pp. 68–77). Routledge.
37.
HjorthL.BurgessJ.RichardsonI. (2012). Studying mobile media: Cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone. Routledge.
ItoM.OkabeD.MatsudaM. (2005). Personal, portable, pedestrian: Lessons from Japanese mobile use. MIT Press.
40.
JohannesenS. (1981). Sammendrag Av Markedsundersøkelser Gjennomført for Televerket i Tiden 1966–1981 (Summary of market research carried out for the Televerket in the period 1966 - 1981). Televerkets Forskninginstitutt.
41.
JonesS.KarnowskiV.LingR.von PapeT. (2023). Celebrating 10 years of mobile media & communication.Mobile Media & Communication, 11(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221134909
42.
KatzJ. E. (2008). Handbook of mobile communication studies. MIT Press. http://103.62.146.201:8081/jspui/bitstream/1/2864/1/3.pdf
43.
KatzJ. E.AakhusM. (Eds.) (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge University Press.
44.
KlamerL.HaddonL.LingR. (2000). The qualitative analysis of ICTs and mobility, time stress and social networking.Eurescom.
45.
KopomaaT. (2000). The city in your pocket: The birth of the mobile information society. Gaudeamus.
46.
LangeK. (1993). Some concerns about the future of mobile communications in residential markets. In M.Christofferson (Ed.), Telecommunication: Limits to deregulation (pp. 197–210). IOS Press.
47.
LingR. (1997). “One can talk about common manners! The use of mobile telephones in inappropriate situations. In L.Haddon (Ed.), Communications on the move: The experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s (pp. 73–96). Telia COST248.
48.
LingR. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. Morgan Kaufmann.
49.
LingR. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into society. MIT Press.
50.
LingR.CampbellS. (Eds.) (2011). Mobile communication:Bringing us together and tearing us apart. Mobile communication research series II. Transaction.
51.
LingR.FortunatiL.LimS. S.GogginG.LiY. (Eds.) (2020). The Oxford handbook of mobile communication and society. Oxford University Press.
52.
LingR.JulsrudT.KroghE. (1997). The Gore-Tex principle: The Hytte and mobile telephones in Norway. In L.Haddon (Ed.), Communications on the move: The experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s. (pp. 97–120) Telia COST248.
53.
LingR.PanchapakesanC.AricatR.OregliaE.LwinM. O. (2017). Mobile communication in Myanmar. In The Routledge companion to global internet histories (pp. 296–310). Routledge.
54.
LingR.PedersenP. (Ed.) (2005). Mobile communications: Renegotiation of the social sphere. Springer.
55.
LingR.YttriB. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In J. E.KatzM.Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139–169). Cambridge University Press.
56.
LohanE. M. (1996a). The domestic phone space: The telephone space in the home and the domestic space in telephony a participant observation case study of the telephone in three Dublin households. Working paper. COST 248.
57.
LohanM. (1996b). Key points for COST 248 project on home and work: The incorporation of new technologies into the private sphere. In COST 248 Meeting, Brussels, Belgium.
58.
Mante-MeijerE.HaddonL.ConcejeroP.KlamerL.HeresJ.LingR.ThomasF.SmoredaZ.VrielingI. (2001). Checking it out with the people—ICT markets and users in Europe.Eurescom.
59.
NafusD.TraceyK. (2002). Mobile phone consumption and concepts of personhood. In J. E.KatzM.Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 206–221). Cambridge University Press.
60.
NyíriK. (Ed.) (2002). Mobile communication. Passagen Verlag.
61.
NyíriK. (Ed.) (2003). Mobile democracy: Essays on society, self and politics. Passagen Verlag.
62.
NyíriK. (Ed.) (2005). A sense of place: The global and the local in Mobile communication. Passagen Verlag.
63.
NyíriK. (Ed.) (2009). Engagement and exposure. Passagen Verlag.
64.
NyíriK. (Ed.) (2008a). Integration and ubiquity. Passagen Verlag.
65.
NyíriK. (Ed.) (2008b). Mobile communication and the ethics of social networking. Passagen Verlag.
66.
RakowL. F.NavarroV. (1993). Remote mothering and the parallel shift: Women meet the cellular telephone.Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039309366856
67.
RautiainenP.KasesniemiE.-L. (2000). Mobile communication of children and teenagers: Case Finland 1997–2000. In R.LingK.Thrane (Eds.), Sosiale Konsekvenser Av Mobiletelefoni: Proceedings Fra et Seminar Om Samfunn, Barn Og Mobile Telefoni (The social consequences of mobile telephony: Proceedings from a seminare on society, children and mobile telephony) (pp. 15–18). Telenor FoU.
68.
RheingoldH. (2002). Smart mobs. Persius.
69.
SchegloffE. A. (2002). On “open sequencing”: A framing statement. In J. E.KatzM.Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 321–325). Cambridge University Press.
70.
SmoredaZ.ThomasF. (2001,November 12–15). Social networks and residential ICT adoption and use. In 3G technologies and applications. Eurescom Summit Meeting, Heidelberg, Germany.
71.
StrømG. (2002). The telephone comes to a Filipino village. In J. E.KatzM.Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 274–283). Cambridge University Press.
72.
WallisC. (2008). Technomobility in the margins: Mobile phones and young rural women in Beijing.University of Southern California.
73.
WeiR.LoV.-H. (2006). Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness.New Media and Society, 8(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806059870
74.
WirthW.Von PapeT.KarnowskiV. (2008). An integrative model of mobile phone appropriation.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00412.x