BennettS.MatonK.KervinL. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
2.
CampbellS. (2019). From frontier to field: Old and new theoretical directions in mobile communication studies. Communication Theory, 29(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty021
3.
CampbellS. (2020). Cutting the cord: Social and scholarly revolutions as CMC goes mobile. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz021
4.
CummingsR.ReimerT. (2020). Cellphone relevance in face-to-face interactions: The effects of cellphone use on conversational satisfaction. Mobile Media and Communication, 9, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920958437
KadylakT. (2019). An investigation of perceived family phubbing expectancy violations and well-being among US older adults. Mobile Media and Communication, 8(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919872238
8.
KatzJ. (1992, May 23). The emerging personal communication environment. International Communications Association Annual Meeting, Miami, Florida, USA.
9.
KatzJ. (1999). Connections: Social and cultural studies of the telephone in American life. Transaction Publishers.
RozgonjukD.PruunsildP.JürimäeK.SchwarzR. J.AruJ. (2020). Instagram use frequency is associated with problematic smartphone use, but not with depression and anxiety symptom severity. Mobile Media and Communication, 8(3), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920910190
12.
TomitaH. (Ed.). (2021). The second offline: Doubling of time and place. Springer.
13.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P. (2020). The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and a research agenda. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim, & Y. Li (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mobile communication and society (pp. 158–174). Oxford University Press.
