DaneseE. (2022, April 31). The robotic imaginary in the fashion world. Presentation at the University of Udine, Italy.
2.
FortunatiL.TaipaleS. (2017). Mobilities and the network of personal technologies: Refining the understanding of mobility structure. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.011
3.
GergenK. J. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In J. Katz, & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227–241). Cambridge University Press.
4.
HeppA. (2020). Artificial companions, social bots and work bots: Communicative robots as research objects of media and communication studies. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7–8), 1410–1426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720916412
5.
HumphreysL. (2018). The qualified self: Social media and the accounting of everyday life. MIT Press.
6.
HumphreysL.KarnowskiV.Von PapeT. (2018). Smartphones as metamedia: A framework for identifying the niches structuring smartphone use. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2793–2809. https://doi.org/1932-8036/201800005
7.
JensenK. B. (2016). Metamedium. In K. B. Jensen, E. W. Rothenbuhler, J. D. Pooley, & R. T. Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1–4). John Wiley & Sons.
8.
JensenK. B. (2022). Media convergence: The three degrees of network, mass, and interpersonal communication. Routledge.
9.
MullanK.WajcmanJ. (2017). Have mobile devices changed working patterns in the 21st century? A time-diary analysis of work extension in the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017017730529
10.
NataleS.CookeH. (2020). Browsing with Alexa: Interrogating the impact of voice assistants as web interfaces. Media, Culture & Society, 43(6), 1000–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720983295
11.
OksmanV.RautiainenP. (2002). Perhaps it is a body part. How the mobile phone became an organic part of the everyday lives of children and adolescents. In J. E.Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 293–308). Transaction Publishers.
12.
OngW. J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word. Methuen & Co.
13.
ÖzkulD.HumphreysL. (2015). Record and remember: Memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914565846
14.
SimmelG. (1908). Soziologie. Duncker & Humblot.
15.
SugiyamaS. (2013). Melding with the self, melding with relational partners, and turning into a quasi-social robot: A Japanese case study of people’s experiences of emotion and mobile devices. Intervalla. Platform for Intellectual Exchange, 1(1), 71–84.
16.
TaipaleS.FortunatiL. (2018). Robots as the next new media. In A.Guzman (Ed.), Human–machine communication: Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves (pp. 201–219). Peter Lang.
17.
TaipaleS.TurjaT.Van AerschotL. (2020). Robotization of mobile communication. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim, & Y. Li (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mobile communication, culture, and information (pp. 653–666). Oxford University Press.
18.
Vanden AbeeleM. (2020). The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and a research agenda. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim, & Y. Li (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mobile communication, culture, and information (pp. 158–174). Oxford University Press.
19.
VincentJ. (2013). Is the mobile phone a personalized social robot?Intervalla. Platform for Intellectual Exchange, 1(1), 60–70.
20.
VordererP.HefnerD.ReineckeL.KlimmtC. (Eds.). (2018). Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC world. Routledge.
21.
YaoM. Z.LingR. (2020). “What is computer-mediated communication?” An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz027