This study initiates a line of research on how the fifth generation of wireless infrastructure (“5G”) is being imagined through media portrayals—in this case through advertising. At the time of this writing, 5G is not yet widely available, however the media is saturated with narratives about how it will revolutionize everyday life. Drawing from the social imaginaries and media infrastructures traditions, this textual analysis examines the social shaping of 5G through advertisements from leading telecoms in leading markets, including China and the United States. Findings reveal an overarching trend with ads from both societies imagining 5G in futuristic and utopian ways, suggesting new possibilities for people, objects, and places to be connected through smart homes, vehicles, factories, and cities—not just through smart phones. The findings also reveal distinctions in how 5G is envisioned at the societal level. For example, ads from China imagine 5G as a source of national pride that will elevate its global standing, while the US telecoms have a more inward focus on domestic competition. The discussion offers interpretations of these and other findings, along with directions for future research.
BarneyJ. (2015). "We shall not be moved": On the politics of mobility. In HermanA.HadlawJ.SwissT. (Eds.), Theories of the mobile internet: Materialities and imaginaries (pp. 15–24). Routledge.
2.
DourishP.BellG. (2007). Divining a digital future: Mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. MIT Press.
3.
FanP. (2011). Innovation, globalization, and catch-up of latecomers: Cases of Chinese telecom firms. Environment and Planning A, 43(4), 830–849. doi: 10.1068/a43152
4.
FarmanJ. (2015). The materiality of locative media. In HermanA.HadlawJ.SwissT. (Eds.), Theories of the mobile internet: Materialities and imaginaries (pp. 45–59). Routledge.
5.
FrithJ. (2015). Smartphones as locative media. Polity Press.
6.
GogginG. (2015). Mobile web 2.0: New imaginaries of mobile internet. In HermanA.HadlowJ.SwissT. (Eds.), Theories of the mobile internet: Materialities and imaginaries (pp. 134–148). Routledge.
7.
GogginG. (2020). Mobile paradoxes: European emergence of mobile internet, users, and markets. Internet Histories, 4(2), 161–177. doi: 10.1080/24701475.2020.1741968
8.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
9.
HongY. (2017). Networking China: The digital transformation of the Chinese economy. University of Illinois Press.
10.
HorstH. A. (2013). The infrastructures of mobile media: Towards a future research agenda. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 147–152. doi: 10.1177/2050157912464490
11.
JinD. Y. (2005). The telecom crisis and beyond: Restructuring of the global telecommunications system. International Communication Gazette, 67(3), 289–304. doi: 10.1177/0016549205052232
ParksL. (2015). “Stuff you can kick”: Toward a theory of media infrastructures. In SvenssonP.GoldbergD. T. (Eds.), Between humanities and the digital (pp. 355–373). MIT Press.
20.
ParksL.StarosielskiN. (Eds.). (2015). Signal traffic: Critical studies of media infrastructures. University of Illinois Press.
21.
PentzoldC.BrantnerC.FölschL. (2019). Imagining big data: Illustrations of “big data” in US news articles, 2010–2016. New Media & Society, 21(1), 139–167. doi: 10.1177%2F1461444818791326
22.
RyuM. H.YangS.KimS. (2018). Do telecom carrier takeovers create value? Longitudinal analysis of U.S. telecom carrier takeovers from 1996 to 2005. Telecommunications Policy, 42(5), 395–408. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.02.005
23.
ShahR. C.KesanJ. P. (2007). The privatization of the internet’s backbone network. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 51(1), 93–109. doi: 10.1080/08838150701308077
24.
StarS. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. doi: 10.1177/00027649921955326
25.
StarS. L.GriesemerJ. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
26.
StarS. L.RuhlederK. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.
27.
StarosielskiN. (2015). The undersea network. Duke University Press.
28.
StegerM. B.JamesP. (2013). Level of subjective globalization: Ideologies, imaginaries, ontologies. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 12, 17–40. doi: 10.1163/15691497-12341240
29.
TaylorC. (2002). Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture, 14(1), 91–124.
30.
ThompsonJ. B. (1984). Studies in the theory of ideology. University of California Press.
31.
XiaJ. (2017). China’s telecommunications evolution, institutions, and policy issues on the eve of 5G: A two-decade retrospect and prospect. Telecommunications Policy, 41(10), 931–947. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.11.003
32.
WattsL. (2015). Future archaeology: Re-animating innovation in the mobile telecoms industry. In HermanA.HadlowJ.SwissT. (Eds.), Theories of the mobile internet: Materialities and imaginaries (pp. 149–167). Routledge.
33.
WebsterF. (2002). The information society revisited. In LievrouwL.LivingstoneS. (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs (pp. 22–33). Sage.
34.
WeiserM. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104.
35.
ZhaoY. (2010). China’s pursuits of indigenous innovations in information technology developments: Hopes, follies and uncertainties. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(3), 266–289. doi: 10.1080/17544750.2010.499628
