This paper focuses on the blurring boundary between the “human self” and the smartphone, using interviews with 60 heavy smartphone users. The interview responses reveal three types of self-extension via the smartphone—functional extension, anthropomorphic extension, and ontological extension. Smartphone users assert that their phone has become an indispensable part of their self and thus influences their identity and sense of being in both positive and negative ways.
AlexanderP. S. (2000, April). Teens and mobile phones growing-up together: Understanding the reciprocal influences on the development of identity. Paper presented at Wireless World Workshop Conference, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
2.
AmigoB.OsorioF.BravoM. C. (2017). Mobile communication technologies and ontological security. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 74, 39–61.
3.
AshmanI.GibsonC. (2010). Existential identity, ontological insecurity and mental well-being in the workplace. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 2(2), 126–147.
4.
BarrN.PennycookG.StolzJ. A.FugelsangJ. A. (2015). The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 48(4), 473–480.
5.
BatatW. (2009). The impact of technology development on youth consumption culture: An empirical investigation of French teenage’ use of mobile phone device. Communications of the IBIMA, 7(18), 153–163.
6.
BelkR. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.
7.
BelkR. W. (2003). Shoes and self. Advances in Consumer Research, 30(1), 27–33.
8.
BelkR. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.
9.
BellD. (2013). Communication technology: For better or for worse? In SalvaggioJ. L. (Ed.), The information society: Economic, social, and structural issues (pp. 89–103). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
BinarkM.SütcüG. B. (2009). Practicing identity in the digital game world: The Turkish tribes’ community practices in “Silkroad Online.” In AbbasY.DervinF. (Eds.), Digital technologies of the self (pp. 61–83). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
BurchellK. (2015). Tasking the everyday: Where mobile and online communication take time. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(1), 36–52.
13.
CampbellH. A. (2016). Framing the human–technology relationship: How religious digital creatives engage posthuman narratives. Social Compass, 63(3), 302–318.
14.
CarrN. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
15.
ClarkA. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
ClarkA.ChalmersD. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.
17.
CohenK.WakefordN. (2003, July). The making of mobility, the making of self. Paper presented at the INCITE Project conference, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
18.
CooleyC. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
19.
DavelC. (2017). The mobile phone as an extension of the self: A study among adolescents in a secondary school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
DittmarH. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22.
FortunatiL. (1998). The ambiguous image of the mobile phone. In HaddonL. (Ed.), Communications on the move: The experience of mobile telephony in the 1990s (pp. 131–145). Farsta, Sweden: Telia.
23.
GantD.KieslerS. (2001). Blurring the boundaries: Cell phones, mobility, and the line between work and personal life. In BrownB.GreenN.HarperR. (Eds.), Wireless world: Social and interactional aspects of the mobile age (pp. 121–131). London, UK: Springer Science & Business Media.
24.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
GreenfieldS. (2015). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. New York, NY: Random House.
26.
HarkinJ. (2003). Mobilisation: The growing public interest in mobile technology. London, UK: Demos.
27.
HulmeM.PetersS. (2001). Me, my phone and I: The role of the mobile phone. CHI 2001 workshop: Mobile Communications: Understanding Users, Adoption, and Design (pp. 3–6). New York, NY: ACM.
28.
JohnsonJ. M. (2002). In-depth interviewing. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 103–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
KatzJ. E. (2003). Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
30.
KimY.SundarS. S. (2012). Visualizing ideal self vs. actual self through avatars: Impact on preventive health outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1356–1364.
31.
KingA. L. S.ValençaA. M.SilvaA. C. O.BaczynskiT.CarvalhoM. R.NardiA. E. (2013). Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia?Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 140–144.
KonokV.GiglerD.BereczkyB. M.MiklósiÁ. (2016). Humans’ attachment to their mobile phones and its relationship with interpersonal attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 61(4), 537–547.
34.
LaingR. D. (1990). The divided self. London, UK: Penguin.
35.
LeeY. K.ChangC. T.LinY.ChengZ. H. (2014). The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(2), 373–383.
36.
LeongL. (2016). Mobile identities: Managing self and stigma in iPhone app use. Observatorio (OBS*), 10(1), 1–25.
37.
LeyensJ.-P.CortesB. P.DemoulinS.DovidioJ. F.FiskeS. T.GauntR.. . . VaesJ. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 703–717.
38.
LingR. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.
39.
LorenteS. (2002). Youth and mobile telephones: More than a fashion. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 57(2), 9–24.
40.
MarkusH.NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.
NaftaliM.FindlaterL. (2014). Accessibility in context: Understanding the truly mobile experience of smartphone users with motor impairments. Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (pp. 209–216). New York, NY: ACM.
46.
NassC.MoonY. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103.
47.
OksmanV.RautiainenP. (2003). “Perhaps it is a body part”: How the mobile phone became an organic part of the everyday lives of Finnish children and teenagers. In KatzJ. E. (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 293–308). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
48.
OulasvirtaA.BlomJ. (2007). Motivations in personalisation behaviour. Interacting with Computers, 20(1), 1–16.
49.
ParkN.LeeH. (2012). Social implications of smartphone use: Korean college students’ smartphone use and psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), 491–497.
50.
PepperellR. (1995). The posthuman condition: Consciousness beyond the brain. Oxford, UK: Intellect Books.
RobertsJ. A.PulligC.ManolisC. (2015). I need my smartphone: A hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 13–19.
53.
RodenD. (2015). Posthuman life: Philosophy at the edge of the human. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
ShinW.LinT. T. C. (2016). Who avoids location-based advertising and why? Investigating the relationship between user perceptions and advertising avoidance. Computers in Human Behavior, 63(5), 444–452.
SolomonM. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 319–329.
57.
SugiyamaS. (2009). The decorated mobile phone and emotional attachment for Japanese youths. In VincentJ.FortunatiL. (Eds.), Electronic emotion: The mediation of emotion via information and communication technologies (pp. 85–103). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
58.
TurkleS. (2005). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
TurkleS. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. New York, NY: Penguin.
60.
Van DeursenA. J.BolleC. L.HegnerS. M.KommersP. A. (2015). Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45(2), 411–420.
61.
Von PapeT. (2018). Living in the moment: Self-narratives of permanently connected media users. In VordererP.HefnerD.ReineckeL.KlimmtC. (Eds.), Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC world (pp. 97–106). New York, NY: Routledge.
62.
VykoukalováZ. (2007). Adolescent mobile communication: Transformation of communication patterns of Generation SMS?Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 1(1). Retrieved from https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4206
63.
WalshS. P.WhiteK. M. (2007). Me, my mobile, and I: The role of self- and prototypical identity influences in the prediction of mobile phone behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(10), 2405–2434.
64.
WangW. (2017). Smartphones as social actors? Social dispositional factors in assessing anthropomorphism. Computers in Human Behavior, 68(2), 334–344.
65.
WilmerH. H.ShermanL. E.CheinJ. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–16.
66.
WinnerL. (2004). Who will be in cyberspace? In WebsterF. (with BlomR.KarvonenE.MelinH.NordenstrengK.PuoskariE.) (Eds.), The information society reader (pp. 45–54). London, UK: Routledge.
YildirimC.SumuerE.AdnanM.YildirimS. (2016). A growing fear: Prevalence of nomophobia among Turkish college students. Information Development, 32(5), 1322–1331.
