With the widespread use of mobile phones in the developing world, interactive voice response (IVR) systems are increasingly accessible to people with low literacy and/or limited financial resources. Interest in using IVR systems as a means to increase citizen participation in society has increased. Yet, research exploring the potential of IVRs—with particular affordances, constraints, and norms—to facilitate citizen participation in society remains limited. Drawing on field data gathered as part of a study of CGNet Swara, an IVR-based citizen journalism platform in rural India, we introduce the concept of a “participatory IVR” and undertake a phenomenological inquiry to account for user interactions with the system.
AllaguiI.KueblerJ. (2011). The Arab Spring and the role of ICTs: Editorial introduction. International Journal of Communication, 4, 1435–1442.
2.
AllanS.ThorsenE. (2009). Citizen journalism: Global perspectives (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
3.
ArnsteinS. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
4.
BailurS. (2007). The complexities of community participation in ICT for development projects: The case of “Our Voices.” In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries. Sao Paulo, Brazil.
5.
BarF.BroughM.Costanza-ChockS.GonzalezC.WallisC.GarcesA. (2009). Mobile voices: A mobile, open source, popular communication platform for first-generation immigrants in Los Angeles. In “Mobile 2.0: Beyond voice?” Pre-conference workshop at the International Communication Association (ICA). Chicago, IL.
6.
BauerT. N.TruxilloD. M.ParontoM. E.WeekleyJ. A.CampionM. A. (2004). Applicant reactions to different selection technology: Face-to-face, interactive voice response, and computer-assisted telephone screening interviews. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(1–2), 135–148. doi:10.1111/j.0965–075X.2004.00269.x
7.
boyddanah. (2006). A blogger’s blog: Exploring the definition of a medium. Reconstruction, 6(4), 40–46.
8.
boyddanahEllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
9.
CastellsM. (2013). Communication power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
CouldryN. (2004). The productive “consumer” and the dispersed “citizen.”International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(1), 21–32. doi:10.1177/1367877904040602
11.
DomingoD.QuandtT.HeinonenA.PaulussenS.SingerJ.VujnovicM. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 326–342. doi:10.1080/17512780802281065
12.
DonnerJ. (2007). The rules of beeping: Exchanging messages via intentional “missed calls” on mobile phones. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2007.00383.x
13.
DreherT. (2009). Listening across difference: Media and multiculturalism beyond the politics of voice. Continuum, 23(4), 445–458. doi:10.1080/10304310903015712
14.
DreherT. (2010). Speaking up or being heard? Community media interventions and the politics of listening. Media, Culture & Society, 32(1), 85–103. doi:10.1177/0163443709350099
15.
DuthlerK. W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via email and voic email: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 500–521. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2006.00024.x
16.
FigueiredoM. A.CamaraM. A.PradoP.AlbuquerqueA. M.CâmaraM. A. (2009). Empowering rural citizen journalism via Web 2.0 technologies. Proceedings of the fourth international Conference on Communities and Technologies – C&T ‘09, pp. 77–84. New York, NY: ACM Press.
17.
FischerG. (2011). Understanding, fostering, and supporting cultures of participation. Interactions, 18(3), 42–53. doi:10.1145/1962438.1962450
18.
FordM.BothaA. (2007). MobilED – An accessible mobile learning platform for Africa. In CunninghamP.CunninghamM. (Eds.), ISTAfrica 2007 conference proceedings, pp. 9–11. Maputo, Mozambique: IIMC International Information Management Corporation.
19.
GriffithT. L. (1999). Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 472–488.
20.
HassidJ. (2012). Safety valve or pressure cooker? Blogs in Chinese political life. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 212–230. doi:10.1111/j.1460–2466.2012.01634.x
21.
HeeksR. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer, 41(6), 26–33. doi:10.1109/MC.2008.192
22.
HintzA.MilanS. (2010). Social science is police science: Researching grass-roots activism. International Journal of Communication, 4, 837–844.
23.
HussainM. M.HowardP. N. (2013). What best explains successful protest cascades? ICTs and the fuzzy causes of the Arab Spring. International Studies Review, 15(1), 48–66. doi:10.1111/misr.12020
24.
KatzJ. E. (2007). Mobile media and communication: Some important questions. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 389–394. doi:10.1080/03637750701543519
25.
KatzJ. E.AspdenP.ReichW. A. (1997). Public attitudes toward voice-based electronic messaging technologies in the United States: A national survey of opinions about voice response units and telephone answering machines. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16(3), 125–144. doi:10.1080/014492997119860
26.
KoradiaZ.SethA. (2012). PhonePeti: Exploring the role of an answering machine system in a community radio station in India. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Development, 2012, pp. 278–288. New York, NY: ACM Press.
27.
KotkarP.ThiesW.AmarasingheS. (2008). An audio wiki for publishing user-generated content in the developing world. In HCI for Community and International Development Workshop at CHI 2008 Florence Italy, pp. 1–2.
28.
KumarA.AgarwalS. K.ManwaniP. (2010). The spoken web application framework. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A) – W4A ‘10, pp. 1–10. New York, NY: ACM Press.
29.
LimM. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 231–248. doi:10.1111/j.1460–2466.2012.01628.x
30.
LindlofT. R. (1988). Media audiences as interpretive communities. Communication Yearbook, 11, 81–107.
31.
MadamombeI. (2005). Community radio: A voice for the poor. Africa Renewal, 19(2), 4.
32.
MerazS.PapacharissiZ. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. doi:10.1177/1940161212474472
33.
MudliarP.DonnerJ.ThiesW. (2013). Emergent practices around CGNet Swara: A voice forum for citizen journalism in rural India. Information Technologies & International Development, 9(2), 65–79.
34.
NaylorM. R.KeefeF. J.BrigidiB.NaudS.HelzerJ. E. (2008). Therapeutic interactive voice response for chronic pain reduction and relapse prevention. Pain, 134(3), 335–345. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.11.001
35.
OchoaX.DuvalE. (2008). Quantitative analysis of user-generated content on the web. In De RoureD.HallW. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Understanding Web Evolution, pp. 19–26.
36.
OderoB.OmwengaB.Masita-MwangiM.GithinjiP.LedlieJ. (2010). Tangaza: Frugal group messaging through speech and text. In First Annual Symposium on Computing for Development ACM DEV.
37.
OkollohO. (2009). Ushahidi, or “testimony”: Web 2.0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory Learning and Action, 59(1), 65–70.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
40.
OrlikowskiW. J.GashD. C. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 174–207. doi:10.1145/196734.196745
41.
PatelN.ShahK.SavaniK.KlemmerS. R.DaveP.ParikhT. S. (2012). Power to the peers: Authority of source effects for a voice-based agricultural information service in rural India. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, pp. 169–178. New York, NY: ACM Press.
42.
PettitJ.SalazarJ. F.DagronA. G. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Citizens’ media and communication. Development in Practice, 19(4), 443–452. doi:10.1080/09614520902866462
43.
PlauchéM.NallasamyU. (2007). Speech interfaces for equitable access to information technology. Information Technologies and International Development, 4(1), 69–86. doi:10.1162/itid.2007.4.1.69
44.
PreeceJ.ShneidermanB. (2009). The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human–Computer Interaction, 1(1), 13–39.
45.
RafaelV. L. (2003). The cell phone and the crowd: Messianic politics in the contemporary Philippines. Public Culture, 15(3), 399–425. doi:10.1215/08992363–15–3–399
46.
RauchJ. (2007). Activists as interpretive communities: Rituals of consumption and interaction in an alternative media audience. Media, Culture & Society, 29(6), 994–1013. doi:10.1177/0163443707084345
47.
SherwaniJ.AliN.MirzaS.FatmaA.MemonY.KarimM.RosenfeldR. (2007). HealthLine: Speech-based access to health information by low-literate users. In Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 2007, Bangalore, India, pp. 1–9. IEEE.
48.
SterlingS. R.O’BrienJ.BennettJ. K. (2009). Advancement through interactive radio. Information Systems Frontiers, 11(2), 145–154. doi:10.1007/s10796–009–9170–3
49.
TacchiJ. (2012). Open content creation: The issues of voice and the challenges of listening. New Media & Society, 14(4), 652–668. doi:10.1177/1461444811422431
50.
TraudtP. J.AndersonJ. A.MeyerT. P. (1987). Phenomenology, empiricism, and media experience. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4(3), 302–310. doi:10.1080/15295038709360138
51.
WaltherJ. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–34.
52.
ZainudeenA.SamarajivaR.AbeysuriyaA. (2005). Telecom use on a shoestring: Some findings from a study of the financially constrained in South Asia. Discussion paper WDR0604.
53.
ZuckermanE. (2007). Meet the bridgebloggers. Public Choice, 134(1–2), 47–65. doi:10.1007/s11127–007–9200-y
54.
ZuckermanE. (2010). Decentralizing the mobile phone: A second ICT4D revolution?Information Technologies & International Development, 6, 99–103.
