A mobile contingency model is introduced and used to guide hypotheses about how the strength of people’s habits for using an incumbent medium (here, print newspapers), their degree of adoption of a newer medium (mobile devices), and their attitudes about the importance of professional news sources, influence their use of mobile devices for communication functions including entertainment, interpersonal communication, following news, financial transactions, and e-commerce. Secondary analysis of a 2012 U.S. national phone survey is employed. Older respondents use mobile devices less for all functions, including following news, tend to be loyal print subscribers, and highly agree that it is important for news to be produced by professional news sources. However, when the effect of age is controlled, higher levels of education, and to a lesser extent, income, still significantly predict agreement about the importance of professional news sources. The results demonstrate the crucial impact of news attitudes, and are largely supportive of the mobile contingency model. The most important practical implication is that newspaper companies should be targeting their mobile applications not to their subscribers, but rather to nonsubscribers who have adopted mobile devices, are highly educated, and have higher incomes.
AtkinD.LaRoseR. (1994). A meta-analysis of the information services adoption literature: Lessons to be learned from cable and telephony. In HansonJ. (Ed.), Advances in telematics (Vol. 2, pp. 91–110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2.
BlumlerJ. G.KatzE. (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
BogartL. (1989). Press and public: Who reads what, when, where, and why in American newspapers. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BouwmanH.van de WijngaertL. (2002). Content and context: A new research approach to the basic characteristics of information needs. New Media & Society, 4, 329–335.
5.
ChanM. (2015). Examining the influences of news use patterns, motivations, and age cohort on mobile news use: The case of Hong Kong. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(2), 179–195.
6.
ChyiH. I.ChadhaM. (2012). News on new devices: Is multi-platform news consumption a reality?Journalism Practice, 6(4), 431–449.
7.
DervinB. (1989). Users as research inventions: How research categories perpetuate myths. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 216–232.
8.
De WaalE.SchoenbachK. (2010). News sites’ position in the mediascape: Uses, evaluations and media displacement effects over time. New Media & Society, 12, 477–496.
9.
DiddiA.LaRoseR. (2006). Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an Internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 193–210.
DimmickJ.RamirezA.FeasterJ. (2007, May). The niches of interpersonal media: Relationships in time and space. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, San Francisco, CA.
12.
DimmickJ.RothenbuhlerE. W. (1984). Competitive displacement in the communication industries: New media in old environments. In RiceR. (Ed.), The new media (pp. 287–304). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Dutta-BergmanM. J. (2004). Complementarity in consumption of news types across traditional and new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(1), 41–60.
ElwellC. K. (2014). The distribution of household income and the middle class (Congressional Research Service Report, 7-5700). Retrieved from http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS20811.pdf
17.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
FoehrU. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
19.
GladneyG. A.ShapiroI.CastaldoJ. (2007). Online editors rate web news quality criteria. Newspaper Research Journal, 28(1), 55–69.
20.
GoodhueD. L.ThompsonR. L. (1995). Task–technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.
21.
HamiltonJ. (2004). All the news that’s fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
KovachB.RosenstielT. (2007). The elements of journalism. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
23.
LevyM. R.WindahlS. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications. A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11(1), 51–78.
24.
McCombsM. (1972). Mass media in the marketplace (Journalism Monographs No. 24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
McQuailD. (2005). McQuail’s mass communication theory (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
MeyerH. K.MarchionniD.ThorsonE. (2010). The journalist behind the news: Credibility of straight, collaborative, opinionated, and blogged “news.”American Behavioral Scientist, 54(2) 100–119.
PriorM. (2003). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577–592.
32.
PriorM. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577–592.
33.
RenckstorfK.McQuailD.JankowskiN. (1996). Media use as social action. London, UK: John Libbey.
34.
RobertsD. F. (2000). Media and youth: Access, exposure, and privatization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27(2), 8–14.
35.
RuggieroT. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37.
36.
Schmitz WeissA. S. (2013). Exploring news apps and location-based services on the smartphone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90, 435–456.
37.
SchrammW.LyleJ.ParkerE. B. (1961). Television in the lives of our children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
StempelG. H.HargroveT.BerntJ. P. (2000). Relation of growth of use of the Internet to changes in media use from 1995 to 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 71–79.
40.
StoneG. C.BoudreauT. (1995). Comparison of reader content preferences. Newspaper Research Journal, 16(4), 13–28.
41.
Van der WurffR. (2011). Are news media substitutes? Gratifications, contents, and uses. Journal of Media Economics, 24(3), 139–157.
42.
VishwanathA.ChenH. (2006). Technology clusters: Using multidimensional scaling to evaluate and structure technology clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1451–1460.
WestlundO. (2008). From mobile phone to mobile device: News consumption on the go. Canadian Journal of Communication, 33(3), 443–463.
45.
WestlundO. (2012). Producer-centric vs. participation-centric: On the shaping of mobile media. Northern Lights, 10(1), 107–121.
46.
WestlundO.FärdighM. A. (2011). Displacing and complementing effects of news sites on newspapers 1998–2009. International Journal on Media Management, 13, 177–194.
47.
WestlundO.FärdighM. A. (2015). Accessing the news in an age of mobile media: Tracing displacing and complementary effects of mobile news on newspapers and online news. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(1), 53–74.
48.
WestlundO.WeibullL. (2013). Generation, life course and news media use in Sweden 1986–2011. Northern Lights, 11, 147–173.
