Merging mobile communication studies and urban research: Mobile locative media,“onscreen encounters” and the reshaping of the interaction order in public places
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2013
Merging mobile communication studies and urban research: Mobile locative media,“onscreen encounters” and the reshaping of the interaction order in public places
This communication discusses how the use of locative media in urban public settings allows users to recognize one another’s proximity on screen. Such “on screen encounters” make simultaneously relevant the categories of passer-by and mobile user, thus creating a tension between an orientation towards civil inattention or engaging in focused, face-to-face interactions. Such a tension is characteristic of the interaction order of urban settings experienced as location- or proximity-aware “hybrid ecologies”.
BrownP.LevinsonS. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
CrabtreeA.RoddenT. (2008). Hybrid ecologies: Understanding cooperative interaction in emerging physical-digital environments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12, 481–493.
3.
De Souza e SilvaA.FrithJ. (2010). Locative mobile social networks: Mapping communication and location in urban spaces. Mobilities, 5(4): 485–505.
4.
De Souza e SilvaA.HjorthL. (2009). Playful urban spaces: A historical approach to mobile games. Simulation & Gaming, 40(5), 602–625.
5.
GoffmanE. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York, NY: The Free Press.
6.
GoffmanE. (1971). Relations in public. New York, NY: Harper Colophon Books.
7.
HallE. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
8.
HannerzU. (1980). Exploring the city: Inquiries towards an urban anthropology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
9.
HesterS.EglinP. (1997). Membership categorization analysis: An introduction. In HesterS.EglinP. (Eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp.1–3). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
10.
HumphreysL. (1970). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
11.
HumphreysL. (2007). Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication, 13(1), 341–360.
12.
JosephI. (1993). L’espace public et le visible. Architecture & Comportement, 9(3), 397–401.
13.
KendonA. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
LicoppeC. (2009). Recognizing mutual ‘proximity’ at a distance. Weaving together mobility, sociality and technology. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10): 1924–1937.
15.
LicoppeC.InadaY. (2006). Emergent uses of a location aware multiplayer game : The interactional consequences of mediated encounters. Mobilities, 1(1): 39–61.
16.
LicoppeC.InadaY. (2010). Locative media and cultures of mediated proximity: The case of the Mogi game location-aware community. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(4) 691–709.
17.
LicoppeC.InadaY. (2012). ‘Timid encounters’: A case study in the use of proximity-based mobile technologies. In KonstanJ.ChiE.HöökC. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.
18.
LoflandL. (1973). A world of strangers. Order and action in urban public space. Prospect Heights, NY: Waveland Press.
19.
MasseyD. (2005). For space. London, UK: SAGE.
20.
OrrW. (2008). ‘Prospecting an encounter’ as a communicative event. Discourse Studies, 10(3), 317–339.
21.
SacksH. (1992). Collected lectures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
SöderlundT. (2009). Proximity gaming. New forms of wireless network gaming. In de Souza e SilvaA.SutkoD. (Eds.), Digital cityscapes: Merging digital and urban playspaces. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
23.
SouthernJ. (2012). Comobility: How proximity and distance travel together in locative media. Canadian Journal of Communication, 37(1), 75–92.
24.
TangK.LinJ.HongJ.SiewiorekD.SadehN. (2010). Rethinking location sharing: Exploring the implications of social-driven vs purpose-driven location sharing. Proceedings of UbiComp 2010, Copenhagen (September 26–29). New York, NY: ACM Press.
25.
WatsonR. (1997). Some general reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the analysis of conversation. In HesterS.EglinP. (Eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp. 49–75). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
26.
WhyteW. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
