Abstract
Background:
The manufacturers of clarithromycin sought a drug similar in efficacy to erythromycin but with a superior side-effect profile. They generally achieved this outcome, but postmarketing findings identified a series of reports linking clarithromycin to QTc interval prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP) ultimately leading to a Black Box Warning. We sought to clarify risk factors associated with TdP among case reports of patients receiving clarithromycin linked to QTc interval prolongation and TdP.
Methods and results:
In a detailed literature search, we found 15 women, five men, and one boy meeting our search criteria. Among the 17 adults with reported clarithromycin dose and concurrent QTc interval measurement, we found no statistically significant relationship between clarithromycin dose and QTc interval duration. This did not change for the adults who developed TdP. Among adults, major risk factors were female sex (15), old age (11) and heart disease (17). A total of eight adult subjects had all three major risk factors and 14 of the 20 adults had at least two major risk factors. All adult subjects had at least two risk factors besides clarithromycin. A total of four of the 20 adults received cisapride and three received disopyramide. Three adults were considered to suffer from some aspect of the congenital long QT syndrome.
Conclusions:
We believe that the risk factor description for this drug should be refined to emphasize the major risk factors of (1) female sex, (2) old age and (3) heart disease.
Introduction
Clarithromycin is the most widely used macrolide antibiotic in the United Kingdom and is strongly recommended for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia [Schembri et al. 2013]. The drug’s use among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or community-acquired pneumonia is associated with increased cardiovascular events over the course of a year among patients requiring hospitalization with acute coronary syndrome, decompensated heart failure, serious arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death (SCD) [Schembri et al. 2013]. Because increased cardiovascular risk persisted over the next year after clarithromycin was discontinued [Schembri et al. 2013], the immediate effect of the drug did not explain the above findings even though clarithromycin has a proarrhythmia effect linked in some fashion to QTc interval prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP) [Bril et al. 2010].
Bril and colleagues, in a study of antimicrobial agents linked to QTc interval prolongation, outlined risk factors using a flowchart [Bril et al. 2010]. Drug-related risk factors were separated into administration, pharmacokinetic interactions and pharmacodynamic interactions. Host-related risk factors included modifiable ones (internal environmental disturbances, heart disease, central nervous system and dysautonomy) and those that cannot be modified (older age, female sex, structural heart disease, long QT syndrome and ion channel polymorphisms). Based on our experience with a case report format [Vieweg et al. 2012, 2013a, 2013b; Kogut et al. 2013], we seek to organize risk factors to better help clinicians manage patients requiring treatment with clarithromycin.
Background
In the 1970s, the Japanese drug company Taisho Pharmaceutical developed the macrolide antibiotic clarithromycin aiming to improve on erythromycin’s spectrum of activities, frequency of administration and tolerability [Zuckerman, 2004]. A branded version was introduced into the Japanese market in 1991 and the US market later in the same year. Less than 6 years after its introduction, clarithromycin was linked to erythromycin’s adverse electrophysiological properties including drug-induced TdP [Kundu et al. 1997; Paar et al. 1997; Sekkarie, 1997]. This linkage is exacerbated by the common coprescription of QTc interval prolonging drugs in the outpatient setting [Curtis et al. 2003] and the coprescription of drugs blocking CYP3A4 [Sagir et al. 2003]. Clarithromycin went generic in Europe in 2004 and in the US in mid-2005.
Clarithromycin pharmacology
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
The pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin are similar to those of erythromycin [McConnell and Amsden, 1999]. Clarithromycin is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Clarithromycin has the greatest bioavailability of any of the macrolides [McConnell and Amsden, 1999]. Clarithromycin pharmacokinetics are basically linear and the steady-state concentration of this metabolite is reached within 3–4 days [Abbott Laboratories, 2013].
The postantibiotic effect of clarithromycin varies according to the pathogen [McConnell and Amsden, 1999]. However, the in vivo significance of this in vitro observation has not been determined. Clarithromycin penetrates infected tissue sites extensively. Efficacy is based on maintaining a drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration and clarithromycin is dosed with a frequency to meet this requirement.
Clarithromycin as a hERG channel inhibitor
A common feature of drugs associated with acquired long QT syndrome and TdP is their ability to produce pharmacological inhibition of the activity of the hERG (human Ether-a-go-go Related Gene) potassium ion channel and its native cardiac equivalent, the rapid delayed rectifier K
An intriguing aspect of clarithromycin’s ability to inhibit hERG channels is the potential for this action of the drug to vary between individuals. In 1999, Abbott and colleagues discovered an accessory protein, MiRP1 (also referred to as KCNE2), that can co-assemble with hERG, modifying IhERG properties and drug sensitivity [Abbott et al. 1999]. A MiRP1 mutation, Q9E-hMiRP1, which was identified in a patient treated who survived clarithromycin-induced TdP and ventricular fibrillation, was found in vitro to increase markedly hERG’s sensitivity to inhibition by clarithromycin [Abbott et al. 1999].
Analysis of static and dynamic complex variables
Multiple regression analysis evaluates the effects of more than one independent variable on a dependent variable. However, the assumption is that neither variable changes in the course of analysis. Risk factors associated with drug-induced QTc interval prolongation and TdP may change dynamically and the risk factors themselves may be approximations of more specific factors [Vieweg et al. 2012, 2013a, 2013b; Kogut et al. 2013].
Elements of nonlinear phenomena include chaos, fractals, cellular automata, genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic. They have been brought together by Willi-Hans Steeb in the 5th edition of his book The Nonlinear Workbook [Steeb, 2011]. Components likely best describe the interaction of drug-linked QTc interval prolongation and attendant risk factors to produce TdP [Vieweg et al. 2012, 2013a, 2013b; Kogut et al. 2013].
Methods
Risk factors for QTc interval prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP) by case reports among patients receiving clarithromycin (CAM).
Results
We found 15 women, five men and one boy (Table 1). Among the 17 adults with reported clarithromycin dose and concurrent QTc interval measurement, we found no statistically significant relationship between clarithromycin dose and QTc interval duration (Pearson’s r = −0.086, p = 0.744; Kendall’s τB r = −0.185, p = 0.359; Spearman’s rho ρ = −0.223, p = 0.390). These findings did not change for the adults who developed TdP (Pearson’s r = −0.093, p = 0.785; Kendall’s τB r = −0.159, p = 0.541; Spearman’s rho ρ = −0.161, p = 0.636). Among adults, major risk factors were female sex (15), old age (11) and heart disease (17). A total of eight adult subjects had all three major risk factors and 14 of the 20 adults had at least two major risk factors. All adult subjects had at least two risk factors besides clarithromycin. A total of four of the 20 adults received cisapride and three received disopyramide. Three adults were considered to suffer from some aspect of the congenital long QT syndrome.
Discussion
In healthy volunteers, the administration of clarithromycin did not lengthen the QTc interval [Van Haarst et al. 1998]. However, plasma clarithromycin levels were not reported in this study. In our study, there was neither parametric nor nonparametric statistical association between drug dose and QTc interval measurement.
The finding of congenital long QT syndrome in three (ages 29, 76 and 79 years) of our 21 patients (14.3%) is quite surprising because the prevalence in the general population is approximately 1:2000 [Schwartz et al. 2009]. Our finding argues strongly for inquiry into a family history of cardiac arrhythmia, presyncope, syncope and SCD before administering clarithromycin.
Cisapride and disopyramide
Among our 20 adult patients (Table 1), four received cisapride (Cases 4, 5, 6 and 10) and all four had at least two major risk factors (female sex, old age and heart disease). That is, clinicians may have to take into consideration other risk factors even when clarithromycin and cisapride are co-administered. Three of our patients (Cases 3, 9 and 14, ages 74, 76 and 76 years, respectively) received disopyramide and all three were elderly and had heart disease. Again, clinicians may have to look beyond the co-administration of clarithromycin and disopyramide to more completely explain drug-related QTc interval prolongation and TdP. These observations highlight the point that these drugs when combined with clarithromycin act synergistically to increase QTc interval duration and increase the risk of subsequent TdP, but may not be the only risk factors in operation.
Risk factors discussed in the literature
In 2001, Bednar and colleagues identified 16 risk factors for QTc interval prolongation and TdP [Bednar et al. 2001]. In 2003, Witchel and coworkers described high-risk patients [Witchel et al. 2003]. In 2003, Viskin and colleagues identified 12 risk factors [Viskin et al. 2003]. In a study of 249 patients, Zeltser and coworkers made the point most patients at increased risk for QTc interval prolongation and TdP have readily identifiable risk factors [Zeltser et al. 2003]. The majority of their 249 patients had at least one risk factor that could be easily identified and 71% had ≥2 easily identifiable risk factors for QTc interval prolongation and TdP. In addition, most women (female sex being the most common identifiable risk factor) had additional risk factors.
Multiple-hit hypothesis
Owens and Ambrose in their study of TdP associated with fluoroquinolones describe the ‘multiple-hit hypothesis’ in which several factors influence TdP development [Owens and Ambrose, 2002]. Many prescribed drugs including antibiotics and antipsychotics unfavorably affect IKr kinetics. However, this impact in-and-of itself rarely explains substantial QTc interval prolongation and resultant TdP [Zareba and Lin, 2003]. Combining the list of risk factors produced by several authors produces the following items [Zareba and Lin, 2003; Sauer and Newton-Cheh, 2012]: (1) prolonged QTc interval, (2) female sex, (3) advanced age, (4) bradycardia, (5) hypokalemia, (6) hypomagnesemia, (7) structural heart disease, (8) cardiac arrhythmias, (9) drug combinations including ion channel blockers and CYP450 inhibitors, (10) reduced repolarization reserve and (11) genetic polymorphisms of gene coding cardiac ion channels or enzymes in liver metabolizing drugs.
Pathogenic theories include (1) triangulation (short-term variability of action potentials preceding TdP [Michael et al. 2007]), (2) reverse-use dependence (action potential prolongation at slower heart rates [Hondeghem and Snyders, 1990]), (3) short-term viability (instability [Sauer et al. 2012]), (4) repolarization dispersion [Sauer and Newton-Cheh, 2012]—these four known together as TRIaD [Sauer and Newton-Cheh, 2012]—and (5) EADs [Sauer and Newton-Cheh, 2012].
We need to use all available information about risk factors for QTc interval prolongation and TdP
As pointed out by Owens and Ambrose [Owens and Ambrose, 2002], information from spontaneous reporting rates (case reports) is not synonymous with incidence rates (all cases occurring over a specific interval such as a year). However, we believe that if regulatory agencies more vigorously emphasize (perhaps through a reward system) the need for pharmaceutical companies and clinicians to report all major drug-related adverse cardiac events, spontaneous reporting rates for drug-related QTc interval prolongation and TdP would better approximate incidence rates. If more information unfolds supporting the hypothesis that drug safety related to QTc interval prolongation and TdP more depends on clinical assessment (such as case reports) than preclinical studies such as hERG analysis, clinicians may have better guidance when prescribing drugs and more drugs may reach the level of phase II and phase III studies ultimately providing a better selection of possible treatments for patients with serious illnesses.
However desirable it may be to have (1) baseline EKGs, (2) serum concentrations of nonclarithromycin drugs and (3) genetic information identifying subjects with the congenital long QT syndrome, the clinician is left to decide on the merits and demerits of clarithromycin administration based on the presence or absence of more readily available risk factors for QTc interval prolongation and TdP. We propose that sufficient information based on case report analysis exists to presently identify the triad of (1) female sex, (2) old age and (3) heart disease as major risk factors for QTc interval prolongation and TdP among patients about to receive clarithromycin. We believe that the FDA and manufacturer of clarithromycin should provide this information in the clarithromycin Black Box Warning. The closer the patient comes to having all three major risk factors, the more likely clarithromycin administration will link to QTc interval prolongation and TdP.
Limitations
The topic discussed in this manuscript is not new [Raschi et al. 2013], but we believe merits discussion from a clinical point of view. Owing to the low incidence of TdP, QTc interval prolongation is used as a surrogate marker of drug-induced TdP risk [Shah, 2005]. Large cohort or population studies and ‘thorough QT’ investigations on healthy volunteers can index the likelihood and extent of QTc interval prolongation with individual drugs, but nonetheless usually provide information on a surrogate marker for TdP rather than TdP itself. By contrast, case reports provide direct clinical information in the setting of TdP occurrence. Consequently, case reports provide valuable insight into risk factors concomitant with drug administration. However, the low incidence of TdP means that the numbers of case reports with individual drugs tend to be limited, as is the case here for clarithromycin, and results from our 21 case reports (20 adults and one child) must only be extrapolated to larger groups with great caution. Another potential limitation with case reports is selection bias as fatalities may not always be reported. Thus, both large sample/population data and case report information need to be considered together when attempting to gain an overall picture of TdP risk of particular drugs.
Conclusion
The FDA has taken the position that current information identifies clarithromycin as an at-risk drug for QTc interval prolongation and TdP. In addition to clarithromycin administration, risk factors include (1) uncorrected hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia, (2) clinically significant bradycardia, (3) patients receiving Class IA or Class III antiarrhythmic drugs and (4) elderly patients. On the basis of case report analysis, elderly female patients with heart disease may be particularly at risk.
Footnotes
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.
