Abstract
Background and objective
Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of diabetes, characterized by significant pain and functional impairment. Gabapentin and duloxetine are standard treatments. This study compared their efficacy in alleviating pain, improving clinical global impression of change (CGIC), reducing sleep interference, enhancing response rates, and assessing safety.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A search of Embase, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases through May 2024 identified randomized controlled trials comparing gabapentin and duloxetine for PDN. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. Data on pain, CGIC, sleep interference, responder rates, and adverse events were analyzed using a random-effects model, with results presented as standardized mean differences and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
Six RCTs with 526 patients (44% female) were included. There was no significant difference between duloxetine and gabapentin in relieving pain (SMD = −0.16, 95% CI [−0.36, 0.03], p = .10, I2 = 66%). No significant differences were observed in the overall effect of CGIC (MD = 0.01, 95% CI [−0.07, 0.09], p = .79, I2 = 0%), or sleep interference (MD = −0.07, 95% CI [−0.36, 0.23], p = .67, I2 = 39%); However, duloxetine showed superiority at week 1 for CGIC (MD = 0.56, 95% CI [0.18, 0.94], p = .003), and week 8 for sleep interference (MD = −0.40, 95% CI [−0.79, −0.01], p = .04, I2 = 0%), while gabapentin was superior at week 1 in sleep interference (MD = 0.75, 95% CI [0.11, 1.39], p = .02). No significant differences were observed in responder rates or adverse events.
Conclusion
Gabapentin and duloxetine are effective for PDN, with distinct advantage at different time points. Personalized treatment is recommended, and future research should assess long-term efficacy in diverse populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
