Satisfactory pain management can have a significant impact on clients’ activities of daily living. We questioned what types of pain management education might improve health professional students’ knowledge, skills and perceptions?
Method
From inception until 30th July 2020, we searched MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, CINAHL Plus, ERIC, EMBASE, Cochrane database and Monash University library. Inclusion criteria were controlled trials of health professional students’ pain education compared to alternative education, usual curriculum or no intervention. Studies were limited to English. Data were synthesised using meta-analysis.
Results
Fourteen articles were included in this review. For continuous data, meta-analysis demonstrated a clear effect favouring the intervention for knowledge SMD 1.47 [95% CI 1.18, 1.77], skills 0.93 [0.58, 1.28] or perceptions 0.69 [0.31, 1.08]. For dichotomous data, results showed no effect for knowledge 4.21 [0.65, 27.41], skills 2.26 [0.47, 11.01] or perceptions 1.96 [0.66, 5.76]. However, the overall result showed an effect 2.82 [1.20, 6.59] favouring the intervention.
Conclusions
In summary, short theoretical interventions are sufficient to change students’ knowledge and perceptions. Longer interventions incorporating interactivity improve skills. Further research is required to indicate the best method, outcome measure, length of intervention and follow-up in delivering these pain courses and assessing the cost and long-term retention of information.
McCafferyM. Nursing Practice Theories Related to Cognition, Bodily Pain, and Man-Environment Interactions. America: University of California Print. Office, 1968.
3.
TwycrossA. Educating nurses about pain management: the way forward. J Clin Nurs2002; 11(6): 705–714.
4.
BuffumMDHuttEChangVT, et al.Cognitive impairment and pain management: review of issues and challenges. J Rehabil Res Develop2007; 44(2): 315–330.
5.
MezeiLMurinsonBBTeamJHPCD. Pain education in North American medical schools. The J Pain2011; 12(12): 1199–1208.
6.
LoKStorrM. Physiotherapy Students’ Exposure to Confronting Clinical Situations-A Qualitative Review. Victoria, Australia Journal of Allied Health2020; 49(4): 153E–160E.
7.
DaltonJABlauWCarlsonJ, et al.Changing the relationship among nurses’ knowledge, self-reported behavior, and documented behavior in pain management: does education make a difference?J Pain Symptom Manage1996; 12(5): 308–319.
8.
KirkpatrickDKirkpatrickJ. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2006.
9.
HushJMNicholasMDeanCM. Embedding the IASP pain curriculum into a 3-year pre-licensure physical therapy program: redesigning pain education for future clinicians. Pain Reports2018; 3(2): e645.
10.
ChowKMChanJCY. Pain knowledge and attitudes of nursing students: a literature review. Nurse Education Today2015; 35(2): 366–372.
11.
UngASalamonsonYHuW, et al.Assessing knowledge, perceptions and attitudes to pain management among medical and nursing students: a review of the literature. Br Journal Pain2016; 10(1): 8–21.
12.
BriggsEVCarrECJWhittakerMS. Survey of undergraduate pain curricula for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom. Eur J Pain2011; 15(8): 789–795.
13.
CorriganCDesnickLMarshallS, et al.What can we learn from first-year medical students' perceptions of pain in the primary care setting?Pain Med2011; 12(8): 1216–1222.
14.
LippePMBrockCDavidJ, et al.The first national pain medicine summit-final summary report. Pain Med2010; 11(10): 1447–1468.
15.
TaubenDJLoeserJD. Pain education at the University of Washington school of medicine. J Pain2013; 14(5): 431–437.
16.
VadiveluNMitraSHinesR, et al.Acute pain in undergraduate medical education: an unfinished chapter!Pain Pract2012; 12(8): 663–671.
17.
ChowKMChanJCY. Pain knowledge and attitudes of nursing students: a literature review. Nurse Edu Today2015; 35(2): 366–372.
18.
PilowskyI. An Outline Curriculum on Pain for Medical Schools. America: LWW, 1988.
19.
Watt-WatsonJHunterJPennefatherP, et al.An integrated undergraduate pain curriculum, based on IASP curricula, for six health science faculties. Pain2004; 110(1–2): 140–148.
20.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol2021; 134: 103–112.
21.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine2009; 6(7): e1000097.
22.
HigginsJPTThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj2003; 327(7414): 557–560.
23.
SheaBJGrimshawJMWellsGA, et al.Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology2007; 7(1): 10.
24.
MoseleyAMHerbertRDSherringtonC, et al.Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother2002; 48(1): 43–49.
25.
de MortonNA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother2009; 55(2): 129–133.
26.
MoreiraRFoltranFAlbuquerque-SendínF, et al.Comparison of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials evidence regarding the effectiveness of workplace exercise on musculoskeletal pain control. Work2012; 41(Supp 1): 4782–4789.
HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJCumpstonMLiTPageMJWelchVA (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
29.
CohenJ.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. The United States of America: Routledge, 2013.
30.
HigginsJPTThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj2003; 327(7414): 557–560.
31.
SchwartzLRFernandezRKouyoumjianSR, et al.A randomized comparison trial of case-based learning versus human patient simulation in medical student education. Acad Emerg Med2007; 14(2): 130–137.
32.
SloanPAPlymaleMLaFountainP, et al.Equipping medical students to manage cancer pain: a comparison of three educational methods. J Pain Symptom Management2004; 27(4): 333–342.
33.
WeinerDKMoroneNESpallekH, et al.E-Learning module on chronic low back pain in older adults: evidence of effect on medical student objective structured clinical examination performance. J Am Geriatr Soc2014; 62(6): 1161–1167.
34.
IoannidisJPATrikalinosTA. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. Can Med Assoc J2007; 176(8): 1091–1096.
35.
ZwetslootPPVan Der NaaldMSenaES, et al.Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments. Elife2017; 6: e24260.
36.
KeefeGWharradHJ. Using e-learning to enhance nursing students’ pain management education. Nurse Edu Today2012; 32(8): e66–e72.
37.
BareissSKNareLMcBeeK. Evaluation of pain knowledge and attitudes and beliefs from a pre-licensure physical therapy curriculum and a stand-alone pain elective. BMC Medical Education2019; 19(1): 375.
38.
RolfeG. Expanding Nursing Knowledge: Understanding and Researching Your Own Practice. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Health Sciences, 1998.
39.
EricksonJMBrashersVOwenJ, et al.Effectiveness of an interprofessional workshop on pain management for medical and nursing students. J Interprofessional Care2016; 30(4): 466–474.
40.
CollearyGO’SullivanKGriffinD, et al.Effect of pain neurophysiology education on physiotherapy students’ understanding of chronic pain, clinical recommendations and attitudes towards people with chronic pain: a randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy2017; 103(4): 423–429.
HammRMFettersNLMuiJW, et al.A comparison of different tutorial materials for teaching chest pain diagnosis. J Physician Assistant Education (Physician Assistant Education Association)2009; 20(3): 6–14.
43.
PapaFJAldrichDSchumackerRE. The effects of immediate online feedback upon diagnostic performance. Academic Medicine1999; 74(10): S16–S18.
44.
PapaFJYoungJIKnezekGet al. (eds) A differential diagnostic skills assessment and tutorial tool. In: Computer Assisted Learning: Selected Contributions from the CAL’91 Symposium. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 1992.
45.
MoseleyGLNicholasMKHodgesPW. A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain2004; 20(5): 324–330.
46.
FerrellBMcCaffreyM. Pain Management: Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitude Survey 1998. (amended 2008). Available from: http://prc.coh.org
FranckeALGarssenBAbu-SaadHH. Continuing pain education in nursing: a literature review. International Journal Nursing Studoes1996; 33(5): 567–578.
49.
WidemanTHMillerJBostickG, et al.Advancing pain education in Canadian physiotherapy programmes: results of a consensus-generating workshop. Physiother Can2018; 70(1): 24–33.
50.
DomenechJSánchez-ZuriagaDSegura-OrtíE, et al.Impact of biomedical and biopsychosocial training sessions on the attitudes, beliefs, and recommendations of health care providers about low back pain: a randomised clinical trial. Pain2011; 152(11): 2557–2563.
51.
DwyerCPMacNeelaPDurandH, et al.Effects of biopsychosocial education on the clinical judgments of medical students and GP trainees regarding future risk of disability in chronic lower back pain: a randomized control trial. Pain Med2020; 21(5): 939–950.
52.
LiuY-MLinG-LChaoK-Y, et al.Comparison of the effectiveness of teaching strategies for a pediatric pain management program for undergraduate nursing students: a quantitative evaluation using an objective structured clinical examination. Nurse Edu Pract2020; 43: 102707.
53.
SchreinerUHaefnerAGologanR, et al.Effective teaching modifies medical student attitudes toward pain symptoms. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg2011; 37(6): 655–659.
54.
StevensDLKingDLaponisR, et al.Medical students retain pain assessment and management skills long after an experiential curriculum: a controlled study. Pain2009; 145(3): 319–324.
55.
MutsaersJ-HAMPetersRPool-GoudzwaardAL, et al.Psychometric properties of the pain attitudes and beliefs scale for physiotherapists: a systematic review. Manual Therapy2012; 17(3): 213–218.
56.
HatalaRNormanGR. Adapting the key features examination for a clinical clerkship. Med Education2002; 36(2): 160–165.
