ThieleHOhmanEMde Waha-ThieleS, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019. Eur Heart J2019; 40(32): 2671-2683.
2.
HochmanJSSleeperLAWebbJG, et al. Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. New Engl J Med1999; 341(9): 625-634.
3.
AissaouiNPuymiratETaboneX, et al. Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French Nationwide Registries. Eur Heart J2012; 33(20): 2535-2543.
4.
DiepenSvKatzJNAlbertNM, et al. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation2017; 136(16): e232-e68.
5.
RathodKSKogantiSIqbalMB, et al. Contemporary trends in cardiogenic shock: Incidence, intra-aortic balloon pump utilisation and outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2018; 7(1): 16-27.
6.
BergDDBohulaEADiepenSv, et al. Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes2019; 12(3): e005618.
7.
MonnetXTeboulJ-L.Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits. Critical Care2017; 21(1): 147-159.
8.
GaubertMResseguierNThunyF, et al. Doppler echocardiography for assessment of systemic vascular resistances in cardiogenic shock patients. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 101-106.
9.
WijntjensGWFenglerKFuernauG, et al. Prognostic implications of microcirculatory perfusion versus macrocirculatory perfusion in cardiogenic shock: a CULPRIT-SHOCK substudy. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 107-118.
10.
WeipertKFBauerTNefHM, et al. Incidence and outcome of peri-procedural cardiogenic shock: results from the international Euro Heart Survey PCI registry. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 119-126.
11.
Ariza-SoleASanchez-SaladoJCSbragaF, et al. The role of perioperative cardiorespiratory support in post infarction ventricular septal rupture-related cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 127-136.
12.
SiewekeJTBerlinerDTongersJ, et al. Mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with the Impella CP microaxial pump for isolated left ventricular failure. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 137-147.
13.
PössJKösterJFuernauG, et al. Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology2017; 69(15): 1913-1920.
14.
HarjolaV-PLassusJSionisA, et al. Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. European Journal of Heart Failure2015; 17(5): 501-509.
15.
LoehnTO'NeillWWLangeB, et al. Long term survival after early unloading with Impella CP((R)) in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 148-156.
16.
MarkusBPatsalisNChatzisG, et al. Impact of microaxillar mechanical left ventricular support on renal resistive index in patients with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a pilot trial to predict renal organ dysfunction in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 157-162.
17.
KaramiMden UilCAOuweneelDM, et al. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 163-171.
18.
SiewekeJTPfefferTJBerlinerD, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating peripartum cardiomyopathy: Importance of early left ventricular unloading and bromocriptine therapy. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 172-181.
19.
ZeymerUBuenoHGrangerCB, et al. Acute Cardiovascular Care Association position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A document of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2020; 9(2): 182-196.
