Optimised care of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome

Ibañez B James S Agewall S et al . 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting with ST-segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. Epub ahead of print 26 August 2017. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.

Roffi M Patrono C Collet JP et al . 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 267–315.

Kumar A Cannon CP. Acute coronary syndromes: diagnosis and management, part I. Mayo Clin Proc 2009; 84: 917–938.

Solomon CG Lee TH Cook EF et al . Comparison of clinical presentation of acute myocardial infarction in patients older than 65 years of age to younger patients: the Multicenter Chest Pain Study experience. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 772–776.

Montalescot G Sechtem U Achenbach S et al . 2013 ESC Guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2949–3003.

Jain S Ting HT Bell M et al . Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 1111–1116.

Kontos MC Aziz HA Chau VQ et al . Outcomes in patients with chronicity of left bundle-branch block with possible acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 698–704.

Bueno H , ed. ACCA Clinical Decision-Making Toolkit, Edition 2018. Available at: https://www.escardio.org/Education/Practice-Tools/ACCA-Toolkit (accessed 20 February 2018).

Beygui F Castren M Brunetti ND et al . Pre-hospital management of patients with chest pain and/or dyspnoea of cardiac origin. A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2015. Epub ahead of print: pii: 2048872615604119.

Claeys MJ Ahrens I Sinnaeve P et al . The organisation of chest pain units: position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2017; 6: 203–211.

Damman P Clayton T Wallentin L et al . Effects of age on long-term outcomes after a routine invasive or selective invasive strategy in patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative analysis of individual data from the FRISC II – ICTUS – RITA-3 (FIR) trials. Heart 2012; 98: 207–213.

Angeli F Verdecchia P Savonitto S et al . Early invasive versus selectively invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: impact of age. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 83: 686–701.

Savonitto S Cavallini C Petronio AS et al.; for the Italian Elderly ACS Trial Investigators. Early aggressive versus initially conservative treatment in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 2012; 5: 906–916.

Tegn N Abdelnoor M Aaberge A et al . Invasive versus conservative strategy in patients aged 80 years or older with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris (After Eighty study): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1057–1065.

Armaganijan LV Alexander KP Huang Z et al . Effect of age on efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: insights from the Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRACER) trial. Am Heart J 2016; 178: 176–184.

Leonardi S Bhatt DL . Practical considerations for cangrelor use in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. Epub ahead of print 1 June 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2048872617707960.

Alnasser SM Bagai A Jolly SS et al . Transradial approach for coronary angiography and intervention in the elderly: a meta-analysis of 777,841 patients. Int J Cardiol 2017; 228: 45–51.

Valgimigli M Bueno H Byrne RA et al . 2017 ESC Focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2018; 39(3): 213–260.

Costa F van Klaveren D James S et al . Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet 2017; 389: 1025–1034.

Yeh RW Secemsky EA Kereiakes DJ et al . Development and validation of a prediction rule for benefit and harm of dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2016; 315: 1735–1749.

Leonardi S Frigoli E Rothenbühler M et al . Bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes managed invasively with and without ST elevation (MATRIX): randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2016; 354: i4935.

Ferri LA Morici N Grosseto D et al . A comparison of reduced-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous revascularization: design and rationale of the randomized Elderly-ACS 2 study. Am Heart J 2016; 181: 101–106.

Qaderdan K Ishak M Heestermans AA et al . Ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with an acute coronary syndrome: optimization of antiplatelet treatment in patients 70 years and older – rationale and design of the POPular AGE study. Am Heart J 2015; 170: 981–985.

Rocca WA Boyd CM Grossardt BR et al . Prevalence of multimorbidity in a geographically defined American population: patterns by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Mayo Clin Proc 2014; 89: 1336–1349.

Afilalo J Alexander KP Mack MJ et al . Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 747–762.

Singh M Stewart R White H. Importance of frailty in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 1726–1731.

Alonso Salinas GL Sanmartin M Pascual Izco M et al . Frailty is an independent prognostic marker in elderly patients with myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 2017; 40: 925–931.

Denfeld QE Winters-Stone K Mudd JO et al . The prevalence of frailty in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2017; 236: 283–289.

Bibas L Levi M Touchette J et al . Implications of frailty in elderly patients with electrophysiological conditions. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol 2016; 2: 288–294.

Rockwood K Song X MacKnight C et al . A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005; 173: 489–495.

Rockwood K Mitnitski A. Frailty defined by deficit accumulation and geriatric medicine defined by frailty. Clin Geriatr Med 2011; 27: 17–26.

Rich MW Chyun DA Skolnick AH et al . Knowledge gaps in cardiovascular care of the older adult population: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 2419–2440.

Le Guen J Boumendil A Guidet B et al . Are elderly patients’ opinions sought before admission to an intensive care unit? Results of the ICE-CUB study. Age Ageing 2016; 45: 303–309.

Zweibel NR Cassel CK. Treatment choices at the end of life: a comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist 1989; 29: 615–621.