Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Chest pain units (CPUs) are increasingly established in emergency cardiology services. With improved visibility of CPUs in the population, patients may refer themselves directly to these units, obviating emergency medical services (EMS). Little is known about characteristics and outcomes of self-referred patients, as compared with those referred by EMS. Therefore, we described self-referral patients enrolled in the CPU-registry of the German Cardiac Society and compared them with those referred by EMS.

Methods and results:

From 2008 until 2010, the prospective CPU-registry enrolled 11,581 consecutive patients. Of those 3789 (32.7%) were self-referrals (SRs), while 7792 (67.3%) were referred by EMS. SR-patients were significantly younger (63.6 vs. 70.1 years), had less prior myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass surgery, but more previous percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Acute coronary syndromes were diagnosed less frequently in the SR-patients (30.3 vs. 46.9%; p<0.0001). SR-patients showed ST-segment changes in their initial ECG in 19.6% of cases. EMS-patients underwent more coronary angiographies (60.0 vs. 47.5%; p<0.0001), while SR-patients underwent more stress tests (11.3 vs. 7.8%; p<0.001). PCI was performed in 32.6% of the EMS- and in 24.0% of the SR-group (p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

These data demonstrate that patients who contact a CPU as a self-referral are younger, less severely ill and have more non-coronary problems than those calling an emergency medical service. Nevertheless, 30% of self-referral patients had an acute coronary syndrome.

Keywords

Chest pain unit self-referral emergency medical service acute coronary syndrome

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Post

Genth-Zotz

Munzel

. Aktueller Stellenwert einer Chest Pain Unit in Deutschland. [Current priority of a chest pain unit in Germany]. Herz 2007; 32: 435–437.

Post

Genth-Zotz

Munzel

. Versorgung des akuten Koronarsyndroms in einer Chest Pain Unit – eine sinnvolle Neuerung in Deutschland [Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Chest Pain Unit – A useful innovation in Germany] Klinikarzt 2007; 36: 375–380.

Dougan

Mathew

Riddell

. Suspected angina pectoris: A rapid-access chest pain clinic. QJM 2001; 94: 679–686.

Goodacre

Dixon

. Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost effective at my hospital? Extrapolation of data from a randomised controlled trial. Emerg Med J 2005; 22: 418–422.

Goodacre

Nicholl

Dixon

. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care. BMJ. Epub ahead of print 14 January 2004. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.37956.664236.EE.

Keller

Post

Tzikas

. Improved outcome in acute coronary syndrome by establishing a chest pain unit. Clin Res Cardiol 2010; 99: 149–155.

Breuckmann

Post

Erbel

. Acute thoracic pain: Chest Pain Unit – the certification campaign of the German Society of Cardiology. Herz 2009; 34: 218–223.

ACT

Turek

. Comparison of mortality patterns in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction arriving by emergency medical services versus self-transport (from the Prospective Ottawa Hospital STEMI Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 458–461.

Mathews

Peterson

. Use of emergency medical service transport among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: Findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With The Guidelines. Circulation 2011; 124: 154–163.

10.

Durand

Delos

Chaib

. Performance assessment of a chest pain unit: Preliminary 2-year experience in the European Georges Pompidou Hospital. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2009; 102: 803–809.

11.

Diercks

Panacek

. Evaluation of the chest pain patient: Survey of current practice patterns. J Emerg Med 2010; 39: 282–290.

12.

Furtado

Cardoso

Patricio

. Influence of implementation of a chest pain unit on acute coronary syndrome outcomes. J Emerg Med 2011; 40: 557–564.

13.

Cullen

Reeder

Farkouh

. Outcomes in patients with chest pain evaluated in a chest pain unit: The Chest Pain Unit Evaluation in the Emergency Room study cohort. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 871–877.

14.

Sanchis

Bodi

Nunez

. Efficacy of coronary revascularization in patients with acute chest pain managed in a chest pain unit. Mayo Clin Proc 2009; 84: 323–329.

15.

Tzikas

Keller

Post

. Patient satisfaction in acute coronary syndrome. Improvement through the establishment of a chest pain unit. Herz 2010; 35: 403–409.

16.

Beigel

Oieru

Goitein

. Fast track evaluation of patients with acute chest pain: Experience in a large-scale chest pain unit in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 2010; 12: 329–333.

17.

Ting

Bradley

Wang

. Factors associated with longer time from symptom onset to hospital presentation for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 959–968.

18.

Brown

Mann

Daya

., for the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study. Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. Circulation 2000; 102: 173–178.

19.

Meischke

Eisenberg

. Reasons patients with chest pain delay or do not call 911. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25: 193–197.

20.

Hutchings

Mann

Daya

., for the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study. Patients with chest pain calling 9-1-1 or self-transporting to reach definitive care: Which mode is quicker? Am Heart J 2004; 147: 35–41.

21.

Song

Yan

. Patients with acute myocardial infarction using ambulance or private transport to reach definitive care: Which mode is quicker? Intern Med J 2010; 40: 112–116.

22.

Wijns

Kolh

Danchin

. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2501–2555.

23.

McGinn

Rosamond

Goff

Jr . Trends in prehospital delay time and use of emergency medical services for acute myocardial infarction: Experience in 4 US communities from 1987-2000. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 392–400.

24.

McCabe

Patel

Armstrong

. Ambulance use or its lack – impact on the triage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarctions by emergency physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: E1221.

25.

Edwards

Chang

Matsuura

. Relationship between pain severity and outcomes in patients presenting with potential acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 58: 501-507.

26.

Paul

Konan

Guitteny

. Acute coronary syndrome: An analysis of complications during interhospital transports to interventional coronary departments. Presse Med 2008; 37: 1366–1370.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Self-referral to chest pain units: results of the German CPU-registry

Abstract

Background:

Methods and results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material