Abstract
Background
Timely fibrinolysis remains the cornerstone of reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in settings without reliable access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). International guidelines recommend a door-to-needle time (DTNT) of 30 min or less.
Aim
We conducted the first continent-wide meta-analysis to quantify real-world DTNTs and adherence to guideline benchmarks in African hospitals.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science through July 2, 2025, for studies reporting DTNT for adult STEMI patients treated with thrombolysis in Africa. Pooled mean DTNT was estimated via random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood and Knapp–Hartung adjustment. Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q and I2, and sensitivity analyses evaluated robustness.
Results
Across 12 eligible studies encompassing a total of 2193 STEMI patients, about 1261 individuals (57.5%) received thrombolytic therapy. Among the 11 studies reporting mean reperfusion times (1011 patients), the overall pooled mean DTNT was 74.8 min (95% confidence interval: 44.4–105.2; I2 = 99.4%), substantially exceeding the recommended benchmark. Notably, only 36.3% of thrombolyzed patients achieved a DTNT of ≤30 min. Furthermore, none of the included study cohorts reported an overall mean DTNT within 30 min.
Conclusion
African STEMI patients experience door-to-needle delays more than twice the guideline target, with fewer than 4 in 10 receiving timely fibrinolysis. In such settings lacking widespread PCI, implementation of standardized reperfusion protocols, optimized in-hospital workflows, and targeted quality-improvement initiatives is urgently needed to accelerate fibrinolysis, maximize myocardial salvage, and reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
