Previous studies link marital status to mortality across diverse populations. This study examines how sex influences its association with all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer mortality.
Method:
The search was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases and included related articles up to September 16, 2025. The titles, abstracts, and full texts of the included articles were reviewed, and data were extracted and analyzed.
Result:
Twelve cohort studies (1,785,857 individuals) were analyzed. Unmarried status was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality. Specifically, single individuals showed a higher risk of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.37–1.74), cancer (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07–1.22), and CVD mortality (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.28–1.84). Divorced individuals had an increased risk of all-cause (HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.12–1.66) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02–1.52). Widowed individuals showed a higher risk of all-cause (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.11–1.74), cancer (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03–1.23), and CVD mortality (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.23–2.10).
Conclusion:
Unmarried status is significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause, cancer, and CVD mortality. The association between marital status and mortality differs by sex and geographic region. For instance, the link between divorced status and all-cause mortality is significantly stronger in men, while the association between single status and cancer mortality is significantly stronger in women. These findings highlight the importance of considering sex and regional differences in public health interventions.
HoweTR. Marriages and families in the 21st century: A bioecological approach. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
2.
TatangeloGMcCabeMCampbellS, et al.Gender, marital status and longevity. Maturitas2017; 100: 64–69.
3.
KorhonenV. Marital status of the U.S. population 2022, by sex 2024.
4.
KorhonenV. Number of single-person households U.S. 1960–2023 2024.
5.
JoungIStronksKVan de MheenH, et al.Health behaviours explain part of the differences in self reported health associated with partner/marital status in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health1995; 49: 482–488.
6.
TuckerJSAndersSL. Social control of health behaviors in marriage 1. J Appl Soc Psychol2001; 31: 467–485.
7.
UmbersonD. Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Soc Sci Med1992; 34: 907–917.
8.
WykeSFordG. Competing explanations for associations between marital status and health. Soc Sci Med1992; 34: 523–532.
9.
BerkmanLFGlassT. Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Soc Epidemiol2000; 1: 137–173.
10.
EngPMRimmEBFitzmauriceG, et al.Social ties and change in social ties in relation to subsequent total and cause-specific mortality and coronary heart disease incidence in men. Am J Epidemiol2002; 155: 700–709.
11.
AtohM. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. (No Title) 2001.
12.
Metsä-SimolaNMartikainenP. The short-term and long-term effects of divorce on mortality risk in a large Finnish cohort, 1990–2003. Popul Stud2013; 67: 97–110.
13.
ManzoliLVillariPPironeGM, et al.Marital status and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med2007; 64: 77–94.
14.
DekkerMKoperJVan AkenM, et al.Salivary cortisol is related to atherosclerosis of carotid arteries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2008; 93: 3741–3747.
15.
MatthewsKSchwartzJCohenS, et al.Diurnal cortisol decline is related to coronary calcification: CARDIA study. Psychosom Med2006; 68: 657–661.
16.
SilventoinenKKorhonenKMartikainenP. Changing associations of coronary heart disease incidence with current partnership status and marital history over three decades. SSM Popul Health2022; 18: 101080.
17.
SephtonSELushEDedertEA, et al.Diurnal cortisol rhythm as a predictor of lung cancer survival. Brain Behav Immun2013; 30: S163–S170.
18.
SephtonSESapolskyRMKraemerHC, et al.Diurnal cortisol rhythm as a predictor of breast cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst2000; 92: 994–1000.
19.
ZhuSLeiC. Association between marital status and all-cause mortality of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a population-based study. Sci Rep2023; 13: 9067.
20.
AnagnostisPAthyrosVGTziomalosK, et al.The pathogenetic role of cortisol in the metabolic syndrome: a hypothesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2009; 94: 2692–2701.
21.
BrunnerEHemingwayHWalkerB, et al.Adrenocortical, autonomic, and inflammatory causes of the metabolic syndrome: nested case-control study. Circulation2002; 106: 2659–2665.
22.
BreezeESloggettAFletcherA. Socioeconomic and demographic predictors of mortality and institutional residence among middle aged and older people: results from the Longitudinal Study. J Epidemiol Community Health1999; 53: 765–774.
23.
EakerEDSullivanLMKelly-HayesM, et al.Marital status, marital strain, and risk of coronary heart disease or total mortality: the Framingham Offspring Study. Psychosom Med2007; 69: 509–513.
24.
FuhrerRDufouilCAntonucciTC, et al.Psychological disorder and mortality in French older adults: do social relations modify the association?Am J Epidemiol1999; 149: 116–126.
25.
RobardsJEvandrouMFalkinghamJ, et al.Marital status, health and mortality. Maturitas2012; 73: 295–299.
26.
GauciSCartledgeSRedfernJ, et al.Biology, bias, or both? The contribution of sex and gender to the disparity in cardiovascular outcomes between women and men. Curr Atheroscler Rep2022; 24: 701–708.
27.
IkedaAIsoHToyoshimaH, et al.Marital status and mortality among Japanese men and women: the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. BMC Public Health2007; 7: 73.
28.
RamezankhaniAAziziFHadaeghF. Associations of marital status with diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a long term follow-up study. PLOS ONE2019; 14: e0215593.
29.
WangYJiaoYNieJ, et al.Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals. Glob Health Res Policy2020; 5: 1–16.
30.
BonaccioMDi CastelnuovoACostanzoS, et al.Gender differences in the association between mortality and socioeconomic-marital status in the Moli-sani Study cohort. J Sex Gender-Specific Med2020; 6: 22–33.
31.
BurgoaMRegidorERodríguezC, et al.Mortality by cause of death and marital status in Spain. Eur J Public Health1998; 8: 37–42.
32.
CelengCTakxRALessmannN, et al.The association between marital status, coronary computed tomography imaging biomarkers, and mortality in a lung cancer screening population. J Thorac Imaging2020; 35: 204–209.
33.
NellesJLJosephSAKonetyBR. The impact of marriage on bladder cancer mortality. In Urologic oncology: seminars and original investigations, 1 May 2009, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 263–267. Elsevier.
34.
ThuretRSunMBudausL, et al.A population-based analysis of the effect of marital status on overall and cancer-specific mortality in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Cancer Causes Control2013; 24: 71–79.
35.
RodinRSmithAKEspejoE, et al.Mortality and function after widowhood among older adults with dementia, cancer, or organ failure. JAMA Netw Open2024; 7: e2432979.
36.
LachoniusMGiangKWPéturssonP, et al.Marital status, educational level, and mid-term mortality risk in 5924 patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J Open2024; 4: 1–8.
37.
LindströmMPirouzifardMRosvallM, et al.Marital status and cause-specific mortality: a population-based prospective cohort study in southern Sweden. Prev Med Rep2024; 37: 102542.
38.
VaPYangW-SNechutaS, et al.Marital status and mortality among middle age and elderly men and women in urban Shanghai. PLoS One2011; 6: e26600.
39.
XiaoMLiAWangY, et al.A wide landscape of morbidity and mortality risk associated with marital status in 0.5 million Chinese men and women: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac2024; 42: 1–13.
40.
MolloyGJStamatakisERandallG, et al.Marital status, gender and cardiovascular mortality: behavioural, psychological distress and metabolic explanations. Soc Sci Med2009; 69: 223–228.
41.
LeungCYHuangH-LAbeSK, et al.Association of marital status with total and cause-specific mortality in Asia. JAMA Netw Open2022; 5: e2214181–e2214181.
42.
HopfDEcksteinMAguilar-RaabC, et al.Neuroendocrine mechanisms of grief and bereavement: a systematic review and implications for future interventions. J Neuroendocrinol2020; 32: e12887.
43.
SeilerAVon KänelRSlavichGM. The psychobiology of bereavement and health: a conceptual review from the perspective of social signal transduction theory of depression. Front Psychiatry2020; 11: 565239.
44.
GoldmanN. Marriage selection and mortality patterns: inferences and fallacies. Demography1993; 30: 189–208.
45.
EngströmGHedbladBRosvallM, et al.Occupation, marital status, and low-grade inflammation: mutual confounding or independent cardiovascular risk factors?Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol2006; 26: 643–648.
46.
PinheiroAPereira JrVLBaltatuOC, et al.Cardiac autonomic dysfunction in elderly women with myocardial infarction. Curr Med Res Opin2015; 31: 1849–1854.
47.
SmythNSiriwardhanaCHotopfM, et al.Social networks, social support and psychiatric symptoms: social determinants and associations within a multicultural community population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol2015; 50: 1111–1120.
48.
YipPSYousufSChanCH, et al.The roles of culture and gender in the relationship between divorce and suicide risk: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med2015; 128: 87–94.
49.
ChungWKimR. Are married men healthier than single women? A gender comparison of the health effects of marriage and marital satisfaction in East Asia. PLoS One2015; 10: e0134260.
50.
KilpiFKonttinenHSilventoinenK, et al.Living arrangements as determinants of myocardial infarction incidence and survival: a prospective register study of over 300,000 Finnish men and women. Soc Sci Med2015; 133: 93–100.
51.
BarrenetxeaJFengQGuD, et al.Widowhood and mortality among Chinese older adults in Singapore: the roles of gender and perceived social support. J Gerontol: Ser B2023; 78: 532–543.
52.
CohenSWillsTA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull1985; 98: 310–357.
53.
ShorERoelfsDJCurreliM, et al.Widowhood and mortality: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Demography2012; 49: 575–606.
54.
AddisMEMahalikJR. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol2003; 58: 5–14.
55.
StaehelinKSchindlerCSpoerriA, et al.Marital status, living arrangement and mortality: does the association vary by gender?J Epidemiol Community Health2011; 66: 1–8.
56.
KendlerKSMyersJPrescottCA. Sex differences in the relationship between social support and risk for major depression: a longitudinal study of opposite-sex twin pairs. Am J Psychiatry2005; 162: 250–256.
57.
LipowiczALopuszanskaM. Marital differences in blood pressure and the risk of hypertension among Polish men. Eur J Epidemiol2005; 20: 421–427.
58.
IkedaAIsoHKawachiI, et al.Living arrangement and coronary heart disease: the JPHC study. Heart2008; 95: 1–24.
59.
RendallMSWedenMMFavreaultMM, et al.The protective effect of marriage for survival: a review and update. Demography2011; 48: 481–506.
60.
BotsSHPetersSAWoodwardM. Sex differences in coronary heart disease and stroke mortality: a global assessment of the effect of ageing between 1980 and 2010. BMJ Glob Health2017; 2: e000298.
61.
PanJ-JFallonMB. Gender and racial differences in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Hepatol2014; 6: 274.
62.
WilsnackRWWilsnackSCKristjansonAF, et al.Gender and alcohol consumption: patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. Addiction2009; 104: 1487–1500.
63.
YeluruANguyenPLeAK, et al.Gender differences in outcomes of cirrhosis in a large cohort of patients in the United States. Gastroenterology2017; 152: S1142.
64.
ESCGRETKRydénLGrantPJ, et al.ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes and diseases of the cardiovascular system developed in cooperation with the EASD. Kardiol Pol2013; 71: S319–S394.
65.
PerreaultLMaYDagogo-JackS, et al.Sex differences in diabetes risk and the effect of intensive lifestyle modification in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care2008; 31: 1416–1421.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
