MeyerKFosterCGeorgakopoulosN, et al.Comparison of left ventricular function during interval versus steady-state exercise training in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol1998; 82: 1382–1387.
2.
MeyerKLehmannMSünderG, et al.Interval versus continuous exercise training after coronary bypass surgery: A comparison of training-induced acute reactions with respect to the effectiveness of the exercise methods. Clin Cardiol1990; 13: 851–861.
3.
WisløffUStøylenALoennechenJP, et al.Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: A randomized study. Circulation2007; 115: 3086–3094.
4.
RognmoØHetlandEHelgerudJ, et al.High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2004; 11: 216–222.
5.
WensIDalgasUVandenabeeleF, et al.High intensity aerobic and resistance exercise can improve glucose tolerance in persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2017; 96: 161–166.
6.
Gorostegi-AnduagaICorresPMartinezAguirre-BetolazaA, et al.Effects of different aerobic exercise programmes with nutritional intervention in sedentary adults with overweight/obesity and hypertension: EXERDIET-HTA study. Eur J Prev Cardiol2018; 25: 343–353.
7.
HansenDDendalePJonkersRAM, et al.Continuous low- to moderate-intensity exercise training is as effective as moderate- to high-intensity exercise training at lowering blood HbA1c in obese type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetologia2009; 52: 1789–1797.
8.
EllingsenØHalleMConraadsV, et al.High-intensity interval training in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation2017; 135: 839–849.
9.
ConraadsVMPattynNDe MaeyerC, et al.Aerobic interval training and continuous training equally improve aerobic exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: The SAINTEX-CAD study. Int J Cardiol2015; 179: 203–210.
10.
CornelisJBeckersPTaeymansJ, et al.Comparing exercise training modalities in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol2016; 221: 867–876.
11.
Gomes-NetoMDurãesARdos ReisHFC, et al.High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol2017; 24: 1696–1707.
12.
GevaertABBoenJRASegersVF, et al.Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A review of cardiac and noncardiac pathophysiology. Front Physiol2019; 10: 638, 1–14.
13.
GuazziMLabateVCahalinLP, et al.Cardiopulmonary exercise testing reflects similar pathophysiology and disease severity in heart failure patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Prev Cardiol2014; 21: 847–854.
14.
FukutaHGotoTWakamiK, et al.Effects of exercise training on cardiac function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart Fail Rev2019; 24: 535–547.
15.
Donelli da SilveiraABeust de LimaJda Silva PiardiD, et al.High-intensity interval training is effective and superior to moderate continuous training in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol2020. 27: 1733–1743.
16.
BeckersPJDenolletJPossemiersNM, et al.Combined endurance-resistance training vs. endurance training in patients with chronic heart failure: A prospective randomized study. Eur Heart J2008; 29: 1858–1866.
17.
LaoutarisID. The ‘aerobic/resistance/inspiratory muscle training hypothesis in heart failure’. Eur J Prev Cardiol2018; 25: 1257–1262.
18.
SuchyCMassenLRognmoO, et al.Optimising exercise training in prevention and treatment of diastolic heart failure (OptimEx-CLIN): Rationale and design of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol2014; 21: 18–25.
