Alternative aerobic training session in coronary artery disease patients in cardiac rehabilitation. A new stone thrown in the pond

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

WHO. Global health estimates 2016: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2016, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index1.html (accessed 11 December 2019).

Piepoli

Corrà

Benzer

, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 1–17.

Anderson

Taylor

. Cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart disease: An overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 12: Cd011273–Cd011273.

Wisløff

Ellingsen

Kemi

. High-intensity interval training to maximize cardiac benefits of exercise training? Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2009; 37: 139–146.

Wisløff

Støylen

Loennechen

, et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: A randomized study. Circulation 2007; 115: 3086–3094.

Freyssin

Verkindt

Prieur

, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation in chronic heart failure: Effect of an 8-week, high-intensity interval training versus continuous training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93: 1359–1364.

Moholdt

Amundsen

Rustad

, et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life. Am Heart J 2009; 158: 1031–1037.

Conraads

Pattyn

de Maeyer

, et al. Aerobic interval training and continuous training equally improve aerobic exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: The SAINTEX-CAD study. Int J Cardiol 2015; 79: 203–210.

Hannan

Hing

Simas

, et al. High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training within cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Open Access J Sports Med 2018; 9: 1–17.

10.

Ades

Keteyian

Wright

, et al. Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: A road map from the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92: 234–242.

11.

Boidin

Traschel

Nigam

, et al. Non-linear is not superior to linear aerobic training periodization in coronary artery disease patients. Eur J Card Prev. 2020; 27: 1691–1698.

12.

Ross

Blair

Arena

, et al. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: A case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016; 134: e653–e699.

13.

Guazzi

Adams

Conraads

, et al. EACPR/AHA Joint Scientific Statement. Clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2917–2927.

14.

Agostoni PG. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for heart failure patients: a hodgepodge of techniques, parameters and interpretations. In other words, the need for a time-break. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 633–634.