Feasibility of measuring patient-reported health status at time of percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from a single-center quality-improvement initiative
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2020
Feasibility of measuring patient-reported health status at time of percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from a single-center quality-improvement initiative
ShafiqAArnoldSVGoschK, et al.Patient and physician discordance in reporting symptoms of angina among stable coronary artery disease patients: insights from the Angina Prevalence and Provider Evaluation of Angina Relief (APPEAR) study. Am Heart J2016; 175: 94–100.
2.
BeltrameJFWeekesAJMorganC, et al.The prevalence of weekly angina among patients with chronic stable angina in primary care practices: the Coronary Artery Disease in General Practice (CADENCE) Study. Arch Intern Med2009; 169: 1491–1499.
3.
SpertusJAWinderJADewhurstTA, et al.Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol1995; 25: 333–341.
4.
ChanPSJonesPGArnoldSA, et al.Development and validation of a short version of the Seattle angina questionnaire. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2014; 7: 640–647.
5.
BruckelJWagleNO’BrienC, et al.Feasibility of a tablet computer system to collect patient-reported symptom severity in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Crit Pathw Cardiol2015; 14: 139–145.
CampeauL. Letter: grading of angina pectoris. Circulation1976; 54: 522–523.
9.
KureshiFShafiqAArnoldSV, et al.The prevalence and management of angina among patients with chronic coronary artery disease across US outpatient cardiology practices: insights from the Angina Prevalence and Provider Evaluation of Angina Relief (APPEAR) study. Clin Cardiol2017; 40: 6–10.
10.
ArnoldSVGrodzinskyAGoschKL, et al.Predictors of physician under-recognition of angina in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2016; 9: 554–559.
