ThompsonDROldridgeN. Secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation: Have we got the terms right?Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2004; 11: 183–184.
2.
JelinekMVThompsonDRSkiCet al.40 years of cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in post-cardiac ischaemic patients: Are we still in the wilderness?Int J Cardiol2015; 179: 153–159.
3.
ThompsonDR. Cardiac rehabilitation: Guidelines and audit standards, London: Royal College of Physicians, 1997.
4.
PiepoliMFHoesAWAgewallSet al.2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J2016; 37: 2315–2381.
5.
ThompsonDRClarkAM. Cardiac rehabilitation: Into the future. Heart2009; 95: 1897–1900.
6.
KureshiFKennedyKFJonesPGet al.Association between cardiac rehabilitation participation and health status outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol2016; 1: 980–988.
7.
ClarkAMKing-ShierKMThompsonDRet al.A qualitative systematic review of influences on attendance at cardiac rehabilitation programs after referral. Am Heart J2012; 164: 835–845.e2.
8.
WoodD. Is cardiac rehabilitation fit for purpose in the NHS: Maybe not. Heart2012; 98: 607–608.
9.
SandesaraPBDhindsaDKhambhatiJet al.Reconfiguring cardiac rehabilitation to achieve panvascular prevention: New care models for a new world. Can J Cardiol2018; 34: S231–S239.
10.
ConnollySBKotsevaKJenningsCet al.Outcomes of an integrated community-based nurse-led cardiovascular disease prevention programme. Heart2017; 103: 840–847.
11.
RawstornJCGantNDireitoAet al.Telehealth exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart2016; 102: 1183–1192.
12.
CooreyGMNeubeckLMulleyJet al.Effectiveness, acceptability and usefulness of mobile applications for cardiovascular disease self-management: Systematic review with meta-synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data. Eur J Prev Cardiol2018; 25: 505–521.