O'LearyDHPolakJFKronmalRAet al.Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med1999; 340: 14–22.
2.
LiaoXNorataGDPolakJFet al.Normative values for carotid intima media thickness and its progression: Are they transferrable outside of their cohort of origin?Eur J Prev Cardiol2016; 23: 1165–1173.
3.
GepnerADYoungRDelaneyJAet al.Comparison of coronary artery calcium presence, carotid plaque presence, and carotid intima-media thickness for cardiovascular disease prediction in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging2015; 8: e002262–e002262.
4.
SirtoriCRLabombardaFCastelnuovoSet al.The use of echocardiography for the non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Ann Med2017; 49: 134–141.
5.
HaysAGIantornoMScharMet al.Local coronary wall eccentricity and endothelial function are closely related in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson2017; 19: 51–60.
6.
AmatoMMontorsiPRavaniAet al.Carotid intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasound as surrogate of coronary atherosclerosis: Correlation with quantitative coronary angiography and coronary intravascular ultrasound findings. Eur Heart J2007; 28: 2094–2101.
7.
MygindNDMichelsenMMPenaAet al.Coronary microvascular function and cardiovascular risk factors in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: The iPOWER Study. J Am Heart Assoc2016; 5: e003064–e003064.
8.
BaldassarreDHamstenAVegliaFet al.Measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and of interadventitia common carotid diameter improve prediction of cardiovascular events: Results of the IMPROVE (Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) and IMT-Progression as Predictors of Vascular Events in a High Risk European Population) study. J Am Coll Cardiol2012; 60: 1489–1499.
9.
AmatoMVegliaFde FaireUet al.Carotid plaque-thickness and common carotid IMT show additive value in cardiovascular risk prediction and reclassification. Atherosclerosis2017; 263: 412–419.
10.
GraversenPAbildstromSZJespersenLet al.Cardiovascular risk prediction: Can Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) be improved by adding simple risk markers? Results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur J Prev Cardiol2016; 23: 1546–1556.
11.
SchieleFEcarnotFChopardR. Coronary artery disease: Risk stratification and patient selection for more aggressive secondary prevention. Eur J Prev Cardiol2017; 24: 88–100.
12.
JashariFIbrahimiPNicollRet al.Coronary and carotid atherosclerosis: Similarities and differences. Atherosclerosis2013; 227: 193–200.
13.
Al-LameeRThompsonDDehbiHMet al.Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): A double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet2018; 391: 31–40.
