Ruano-RavinaAPena-GilCAbu-AssiEet al.Participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review. Int J Cardiol2016; 223: 436–444.
2.
KotsevaKWoodDDe BacquerD. on behalf of EUROASPIRE investigators. Determinants of participation and risk factor control according to attendance in cardiac rehabilitation programmes in coronary patients in Europe. EUROASPIRE IV survey. Eur J Prev Cardiol2018; 25: 1241–1251.
3.
PiepoliMCorraUAdamopoulosSet al.Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery. Eur J Prev Cardiol2014; 21: 664–681.
HarrisonASDohertyP. Does the mode of delivery in routine cardiac rehabilitation have an association with cardiovascular risk factor outcomes?Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018; 25: 1925–1933.
6.
HarrisonASTangLDohertyP. Are physical fitness outcomes in patients attending cardiac rehabilitation determined by the mode of delivery?Open Heart2018; 5: e000822–e000822.
7.
PiepoliMHoesAAgewallSet al.2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur J Prev Cardiol2016; 23: NP1–NP96.
8.
HansenDNiebauerJCornelissenVet al.Exercise prescription in patients with different combinations of cardiovascular disease risk factors: A Consensus Statement from the EXPERT Working Group. Sports Med2018; 48: 1781–1797.
9.
PiotrowiczEPiepoliMFJaarsmaTet al.Telerehabilitation in heart failure patients: The evidence and the pitfalls. Int J Cardiol2016; 220: 408–413.
10.
FrederixISolmiFPiepoliMFet al.Cardiac telerehabilitation: A novel cost-efficient care delivery strategy that can induce long-term health benefits. Eur J Prev Cardiol2017; 24: 1708–1717.