Existing evidence suggests that patients affected by acute aortic syndromes (AAS) may benefit from treatment at dedicated specialized aortic centres. The purpose of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact aortic service configuration has in clinical outcomes in AAS patients.
Methods
The design was a quantitative and qualitative review of observational studies. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to the end of December 2017 to identify eligible articles. Areas of interest included hospital and surgeon volume activity, presence of a multidisciplinary thoracic aortic surgery program, and a dedicated on-call aortic team. Participants were patients undergoing repair for AAS, and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were adopted for synthesizing hospital/30-day mortality.
Results
A total of 79,131 adult patients from a total of 30 studies were obtained. No randomized studies were identified. Pooled unadjusted ORs showed that patients treated in high-volume centres or by high-volume surgeons were associated with lower mortality rates (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.46–0.56, and OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.25–0.66, respectively). Pooled adjusted estimates for both high-volume centres and surgeons confirmed these survival benefits (adjusted OR, 0.56; 95% CI 0.45–0.70, respectively). Patients treated in centres that introduced a specific multidisciplinary aortic program and a dedicated on-call aortic team also showed a significant reduction in mortality (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.19–0.5, and OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.15–0.87, respectively).
Conclusions
We found that specialist aortic care improves outcomes and decreases mortality in patients affected by AAS.
SampsonUKNormanPEFowkesFGet al.Global and regional burden of aortic dissection and aneurysms: mortality trends in 21 world regions, 1990 to 2010. Glob Heart2014; 9: 171–180.
2.
HiratzkaLFBakrisGLBeckmanJAet al.ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol2010; 55: e27–e129.
3.
ErbelRAboyansVBoileauCet al.2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J2014; 35: 2873–2926.
4.
OlssonCThelinSStåhleEEkbomAGranathF. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14,000 cases from 1987 to 2002. Circulation2006; 114: 2611–2618.
5.
von AllmenRSAnjumAPowellJT. Incidence of descending aortic pathology and evaluation of the impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a population-based study in England and Wales from 1999 to 2010. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2013; 45: 154–159.
6.
BottleAMariscalcoGShawMAet al.Unwarranted variation in the quality of care for patients with diseases of the thoracic aorta. J Am Heart Assoc2017; 6.
7.
RaghupathyANienaberCAHarrisKMet al.Geographic differences in clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes in type A acute aortic dissection (from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection). Am J Cardiol2008; 102: 1562–1566.
8.
HughesGCZhaoYRankinJSet al.Effects of institutional volumes on operative outcomes for aortic root replacement in North America. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2013; 145: 166–170.
9.
WangWDuanWXueYet al.Clinical features of acute aortic dissection from the Registry of Aortic Dissection in China. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014; 148: 2995–3000.
10.
RussoCFMariscalcoGColliAet al.Italian multicentre study on type A acute aortic dissection: a 33-year follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2016; 49: 125–31.
11.
PompilioGSpiritoRAlamanniFet al.Determinants of early and late outcome after surgery for type A aortic dissection. World J Surg2001; 25: 1500–1506.
12.
MussaFFHortonJDNicholsonJet al.Acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma. A systematic review. JAMA2016; 316: 754–763.
13.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJet al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ2009; 339: b2535–b2535.
BorensteinMHedgesLVHigginsJPTet al.A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods2010; 1: 97–111.
16.
BenedettoUMohamedHVitulliPet al.Axillary versus femoral arterial cannulation in type A acute aortic dissection: evidence from a meta-analysis of comparative studies and adjusted risk estimates. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2015; 48: 953–959.
17.
HigginsJPThompsonSG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med2002; 21: 1539–1558.
18.
EggerMDavey SmithGSchneiderMet al.Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ1997; 315: 629–634.
19.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed 31 December 2017).
AlbrinkMHRodriguezEEnglandGJet al.Importance of designated thoracic trauma surgeons in the management of traumatic aortic transection. South Med J1994; 87: 497–501.
22.
NarayanPCaputoMRogersCAet al.Early and mid-term outcomes of surgery of the ascending aorta/arch: is there a relationship with caseload?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2004; 25: 676–682.
23.
Committee for Scientific Affairs, KazuiTOsadaHet al.An attempt to analyze the relation between hospital surgical volume and clinical outcome. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2007; 55: 483–492.
24.
KnippBSDeebGMPragerRLet al.A contemporary analysis of outcomes for operative repair of type A aortic dissection in the United States. Surgery2007; 142: 524–528.
25.
MiyataHMotomuraNUedaYet al.Toward quality improvement of thoracic aortic surgery: estimating volume-outcome effect from nationwide survey. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2009; 36: 517–521.
26.
DaviesMGYounesHKHarrisPWet al.Outcomes before and after initiation of an acute aortic treatment center. J Vasc Surg2010; 52: 1478–1485.
27.
HarrisKMStraussCEDuvalSet al.Multidisciplinary standardized care for acute aortic dissection: design and initial outcomes of a regional care model. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2010; 3: 424–430.
28.
GopaldasRRDaoTKLeMaireSAet al.Endovascular versus open repair of ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a nationwide risk-adjusted study of 923 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2011; 142: 1010–1018.
29.
ChavanonOBaguetJPAlbaladéjoPet al.Direct admission to the operating room: an efficient strategy for patients with diagnosed or highly suspected acute type A aortic dissection. Can J Cardiol2011; 27: 685–691.
30.
SakataRKuwanoHYokomiseH. Hospital volume and outcomes of cardiothoracic surgery in Japan: 2005–2009 national survey. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2012; 60: 625–638.
31.
ChikweJCavallaroPItagakiSet al.National outcomes in acute aortic dissection: influence of surgeon and institutional volume on operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg2013; 95: 1563–1569.
32.
TsagakisKKonorzaTDohleDSet al.Hybrid operating room concept for combined diagnostics, intervention and surgery in acute type A dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2013; 43: 397–404.
33.
AndersenNDGanapathiAMHannaJMet al.Outcomes of acute type a dissection repair before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary thoracic aortic surgery program. J Am Coll Cardiol2014; 63: 1796–1803.
34.
MurziMMiceliADi StefanoGet al.Enhancing quality control and performance monitoring in thoracic aortic surgery: a 10-year single institutional experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2015; 47: 608–615.
35.
Sales MdaCFrota FilhoJDAguzzoliCet al.Aortic center: specialized care improves outcomes and decreases mortality. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc2014; 29: 494–504.
36.
BellerJPScheinermanJABalsamLBet al.Operative strategies and outcomes in type A aortic dissection after the enactment of a multidisciplinary aortic surgery team. Innovations (Phila)2015; 10: 410–415.
37.
GrauJBKuschnerCEFerrariGet al.Effects of a protocol-based management of type A aortic dissections. J Surg Res2015; 197: 265–269.
38.
IribarneAMilnerRMerloAEet al.Outcomes following emergent open repair for thoracic aortic dissection are improved at higher volume centers. J Card Surg2015; 30: 74–79.
39.
LenosABougioukakisPIrimieVet al.Impact of surgical experience on outcome in surgery of acute type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2015; 48: 491–496.
40.
SchafferJMLingalaBMillerDCet al.Midterm survival after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in more than 10,000 Medicare patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2015; 149: 808–820.
41.
SchafferJMLingalaBFischbeinMPet al.Midterm outcomes of open descending thoracic aortic repair in more than 5,000 Medicare patients. Ann Thorac Surg2015; 100: 2087–2094.
42.
AndersenNDBenrashidERossAKet al.The utility of the aortic dissection team: outcomes and insights after a decade of experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2016; 5: 194–201.
43.
BashirMShawMFieldMet al.Repair of type A dissection-benefits of dissection rota. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2016; 5: 209–215.
44.
BuonocoreMAmarelliCScardoneMet al.Cerebral perfusion issues in acute type A aortic dissection without preoperative malperfusion: how do surgical factors affect outcomes?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2016; 50: 652–659.
45.
MerloAEChauhanDPettitCet al.Outcomes following emergent open repair for thoracic aortic dissection are improved at higher volume centers in direct admissions and transfers. J Cardiothorac Surg2016; 11: 118–118.
46.
ShinKCLeeHSParkJMet al.Outcomes before and after the implementation of a critical pathway for patients with acute aortic disease. Yonsei Med J2016; 57: 626–634.
47.
ZimmermanKPOderichGPochettinoAet al.Improving mortality trends for hospitalization of aortic dissection in the National Inpatient Sample. J Vasc Surg2016; 64: 606–615.
48.
ArsalanMSquiersJJHerbertMAet al.Comparison of outcomes of operative therapy for acute type A aortic dissections provided at high-volume versus low-volume medical centers in North Texas. Am J Cardiol2017; 119: 323–327.
49.
BashirMHarkyAFokMet al.Acute type A aortic dissection in the United Kingdom: Surgeon volume-outcome relation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2017; 154: 398–406.
50.
DuceauBAlsacJMBellenfantFet al.Improved survival after implementation of a large-scale regional dedicated aortic network. J Am Coll Cardiol2017; 70: 3068–3069.
BooherAMIsselbacherEMNienaberCAet al.The IRAD classification system for characterizing survival after aortic dissection. Am J Med2013; 126: 730–730.
53.
BirkmeyerJDDimickJB. Understanding and reducing variation in surgical mortality. Annu Rev Med2009; 60: 405–415.
54.
BirkmeyerJDSiewersAEFinlaysonEVet al.Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med2002; 346: 1128–1137.
55.
BirkmeyerJD1StukelTASiewersAEet al.Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med2003; 349: 2117–2127.
56.
KilicAShahASConteJVet al.Operative outcomes in mitral valve surgery: combined effect of surgeon and hospital volume in a population-based analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2013; 146: 638–646.
57.
VassilevaCMMcNeelyCSpertusJet al.Hospital volume, mitral repair rates, and mortality in mitral valve surgery in the elderly: an analysis of US hospitals treating Medicare fee-for-service patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2015; 149: 762–768.
58.
NishimuraRAOttoCMBonowROet al.2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation2017; 135: e1159–e1195.
59.
FalkVBaumgartnerHBaxJJet al.ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2017; 52: 616–664.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
