Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Although disease-specific exercise guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are widely available, it remains uncertain whether these different exercise guidelines are integrated properly for patients with different CVDs. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-clinician variance in exercise prescription for patients with various CVDs and to compare these prescriptions with recommendations from the EXercise Prescription in Everyday practice and Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool, a digital decision support system for integrated state-of-the-art exercise prescription in CVD.

Design

The study was a prospective observational survey.

Methods

Fifty-three CV rehabilitation clinicians from nine European countries were asked to prescribe exercise intensity (based on percentage of peak heart rate (HR_peak)), frequency, session duration, programme duration and exercise type (endurance or strength training) for the same five patients. Exercise prescriptions were compared between clinicians, and relationships with clinician characteristics were studied. In addition, these exercise prescriptions were compared with recommendations from the EXPERT tool.

Results

A large inter-clinician variance was found for prescribed exercise intensity (median (interquartile range (IQR)): 83 (13) % of HR_peak), frequency (median (IQR): 4 (2) days/week), session duration (median (IQR): 45 (18) min/session), programme duration (median (IQR): 12 (18) weeks), total exercise volume (median (IQR): 1215 (1961) peak-effort training hours) and prescription of strength training exercises (prescribed in 78% of all cases). Moreover, clinicians’ exercise prescriptions were significantly different from those of the EXPERT tool (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study reveals significant inter-clinician variance in exercise prescription for patients with different CVDs and disagreement with an integrated state-of-the-art system for exercise prescription, justifying the need for standardization efforts regarding integrated exercise prescription in CV rehabilitation.

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease exercise prescription EXPERT tool

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rauch

Davos

Doherty

et al.

The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies – The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 1914–1939.

Lewinter

Doherty

Gale

et al.

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials between 1999 and 2013. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015; 22: 1504–1512.

Sibilitz

Berg

Tang

et al.

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults after heart valve surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3: CD010876–CD010876.

Lane

Ellis

Watson

et al.

Exercise for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 7: CD000990–CD000990.

Piepoli

Hoes

Agewall

et al.

2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: NP1–96.

Mezzani

Hamm

Jones

et al.

Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: A joint position statement of the European association for cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation, the American association of cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation and the Canadian association of cardiac rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2013; 20: 442–467.

Corra

Piepoli

Carre

et al.

Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: Physical activity counselling and exercise training: Key components of the position paper from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European association of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 1967–1974.

Piepoli

Corra

Benzer

et al.

Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European association of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 1–17.

Bjarnasons-Wehrens

McGee

Zwisler

et al.

Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: results from the European cardiac rehabilitation inventory survey. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 410–418.

10.

Vromen

Spee

Kraal

et al.

Exercise training programs in Dutch cardiac rehabilitation centres. Neth Heart J 2013; 21: 138–143.

11.

Brodie

Bethell

Breen

. Cardiac rehabilitation in England: A detailed national survey. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006; 13: 122–128.

12.

Thompson

Bowman

Kitson

et al.

Cardiac rehabilitation services in England and Wales: A national survey. Int J Cardiol 1997; 59: 299–304.

13.

McGee

Hevey

Horgan

. Cardiac rehabilitation service provision in Ireland: The Irish Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation survey. Ir J Med Sci 1998; 170: 159–162.

14.

Abell

Glasziou

Briffa

et al.

Exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: A cross-sectional survey of Australian practice. Open Heart J 2016; 3: e000374–e000374.

15.

Tramarin

Ambrosetti

De Feo

et al.

The Italian Survey on Cardiac Rehabilitation-2008 (ISYDE-2008). Part 3. National availability and organization of cardiac rehabilitation facilities. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2008; 70: 175–205.

16.

Ambrosetti

Doherty

Faggiano

et al.

Characteristics of structured physical training currently provided in cardiac patients: insights from the Exercise Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation (ETCR) Italian survey. Mon Arch Chest Dis 2017; 87: 778–778.

17.

Bradley

Wallace

McCoy

et al.

A survey of exercise based cardiac rehabilitation services in Northern Ireland. Ulster Med J 1997; 66: 100–106.

18.

Hansen

Dendale

Coninx

et al.

The European Association of Preventive Cardiology Exercise Prescription in Everyday Practice and Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool: A digital training and decision support system for optimized exercise prescription in cardiovascular disease. Concept, definitions and construction methodology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017; 24: 1017–1031.

19.

Hansen

Dendale

Coninx

. The EAPC EXPERT tool. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 2318–2320.

20.

Cabana

Rand

Powe

et al.

Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458–1465.

21.

Price

Gordon

Bird

et al.

A review of guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation exercise programmes: is there an international consensus?

Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 1715–1733.

22.

Babu

Lopez-Jimenez

Thomas

et al.

Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally. BMC Health Services Res 2016; 16: 471–471.

23.

Hayashino

Jackson

Fukumori

et al.

Effects of supervised exercise on lipid profiles and blood pressure control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012; 98: 349–60.

24.

Grol

Grimshaw

. From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients care. Lancet 2003; 362: 1225–1230.

25.

Shalom

Shahar

Parmet

et al.

A multiple-scenario assessment of the effect of a continuous-care, guideline-based decision support system on clinicians' compliance to clinical guidelines. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84: 248–262.

26.

Lobach

Hammond

. Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. Am J Med 1997; 102: 89–98.

27.

Goud

de Keizer

ter Riet

et al.

Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ 2009; 338: b1440–b1440.

28.

Goud

van Engen-Verheul

de Keizer

et al.

The effect of computerized decision support on barriers to guideline implementation: A qualitative study in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Int J Med Inform 2010; 79: 430–437.

29.

Thomas

King

Lui

et al.

AACVPR/ACCF/AHA 2010 Update: Performance Measures on Cardiac Rehabilitation for Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Services Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians, the American College of Sports Medicine, the American Physical Therapy Association, the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, the Clinical Exercise Physiology Association, the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the Inter-American Heart Foundation, the National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists, the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 1159–1167.

30.

Doherty

Salman

Furze

et al.

Does cardiac rehabilitation meet minimum standards: An observational study using UK national audit?

Open Heart 2017; 4: e000519–e000519.

31.

Kotseva

De Bacquer

De Backer

et al.

Lifestyle and risk factor management in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. A report from the European Society of Cardiology European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) IV cross-sectional survey in 14 European regions. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 2007–2018.

Do clinicians prescribe exercise similarly in patients with different cardiovascular diseases? Findings from the EAPC EXPERT working group survey

Abstract

Background

Design

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References