Eindhoven D, Hilt A, Zwaan T, et al. Age and gender differences in medical adherence after myocardial infarction: Women do not receive optimal treatment – The Netherlands claims database. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018; 25: 181–189.
3.
AndradeSEGurwitzJHFieldTSet al.Hypertension management: the care gap between clinical guidelines and clinical practice. Am J Manag2004; 10: 481–486.
4.
OkonofuaECSimpsonKNJesriAet al.Therapeutic inertia is an impediment to achieving the Healthy People 2010 blood pressure control goals. Hypertension2006; 47: 345–351.
5.
VrijensBde GeestSHughesDAet al.A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol2012; 73: 691–705.
6.
KeenanJ. Improving adherence to medication for secondary cardiovascular disease prevention. Eur J Prev Cardiol2017; 24: 29–35.
7.
WallertJLissåkerCMadisonGet al.Young adulthood cognitive ability predicts statin adherence in middle-aged men after first myocardial infarction: A Swedish National Registry study. Eur J Prev Cardiol2017; 24: 639–646.
8.
Haynes BR, Taylor WD and Sackett DL. Compliance in health care. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.
9.
Haynes R, Montague P, Oliver T, et al. Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002, CD000011.
10.
CastellanoJFusterVJenningsCet al.Role of the polypill for secondary prevention in ischaemic heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol2017; 24: 44–51.
11.
WaldNLawM. A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%. BMJ2003; 326: 1419–1419.
12.
BramlagePSimsHMinguetJet al.The polypill: An effective approach to increasing adherence and reducing cardiovascular event risk. Eur J Prev Cardiol2017; 24: 297–310.
13.
TanYCSinclairHGhoorahKet al.Gender differences in outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome in the current era: A review. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2016; 5: 51–60.
GrahamG. Acute coronary syndromes in women: Recent treatment trends and outcomes. Clin Med Insights Cardiol2016; 10: 1–10.
16.
CookNRPaynterNPEatonCBet al.Comparison of the Framingham and Reynolds risk scores for global cardiovascular risk prediction in the multiethnic women’s health initiative. Circulation2012; 125: 1748–1756.
